littlemissattitude
Super Moderator
Over in the thread on Process, there was a disucssion about feeling that once something is written down, it seems set in stone and is very difficult to revise. This can be true, as was mentioned both of outlines and of the writing itself. I think I have stumbled on an exercise that may be helpful with getting over this feeling.
Last night I was reading "Ender's Game", a short story by Orson Scott Card, that he later expanded into the novel of the same name, which I have also read a couple of times. Great book. Anyway, as I was reading the short story, I noticed several things that had changed in the transformation from short story to novel. Most of them were little things, but they were readily apparent.
So I thought that it might be helpful, if anyone is interested in seeing how that works in hopes of getting over the "set in stone" feeling once they have written something down, to read the novel "Ender's Game" and then read the short story of the same name just to see how Card handled changes in the expansion from short story to novel. I think reading the novel - the finished product - first and then the short story (which is how I did it) might be the best way to approach it, since the reader already has a set idea of how the story unfolds. Then, when reading the short story, it is easier to see how Card started out with different details, sometimes different plot points, but then altered them in the later novel.
Just thought I'd offer the suggestion, if anyone is interested. By the way, the original short story is available in a volume, with two other short stories revolving around the Ender universe, called "First Meetings". It would probably be available through the public library system.
If anyone actually decides to do this, I'd appreciate knowing if you thought it helped at all.
Last night I was reading "Ender's Game", a short story by Orson Scott Card, that he later expanded into the novel of the same name, which I have also read a couple of times. Great book. Anyway, as I was reading the short story, I noticed several things that had changed in the transformation from short story to novel. Most of them were little things, but they were readily apparent.
So I thought that it might be helpful, if anyone is interested in seeing how that works in hopes of getting over the "set in stone" feeling once they have written something down, to read the novel "Ender's Game" and then read the short story of the same name just to see how Card handled changes in the expansion from short story to novel. I think reading the novel - the finished product - first and then the short story (which is how I did it) might be the best way to approach it, since the reader already has a set idea of how the story unfolds. Then, when reading the short story, it is easier to see how Card started out with different details, sometimes different plot points, but then altered them in the later novel.
Just thought I'd offer the suggestion, if anyone is interested. By the way, the original short story is available in a volume, with two other short stories revolving around the Ender universe, called "First Meetings". It would probably be available through the public library system.
If anyone actually decides to do this, I'd appreciate knowing if you thought it helped at all.