Jayaprakash Satyamurthy
Knivesout no more
I've only read three of his books so far - Emphyrio, Night Lamp and Lyonesse: Suldrun's Garden, but his beautiful prose style and unique world-building already has me hooked.
Style is the first thing that strikes you about Vance - he has a graceful, almost Victorian way of writing, complete with exquisitely balanced sentences, aptly used words and rich, compelling description. In fact, I'd suggest you avoid reading any Vance if you are currently engaged in a writing project - the rhythms of his prose have this very insidious quality!
The next thing that sets Vance apart is his world-building. His worlds are not the complex politico-ecological creations of a Frank Herbert, nor are they based on extensive social or tech extrapolations. Instead, he creates worlds that express ideas, states of mind and philosophical conceits, much like the fantastic metropolises in Italo Calvino's Imagnary Cities.
Vance then goes on to set leisurely, gracious tales in these worlds. His plots seem to be fairly straightforward, as far as theme goes - more often than not, the story revolves around an individualistic protagonist, something of an outsider, who embarks on a journey of discovery and transformation.
His works are both in the fantasy and sf genres, but there is really little difference between the two, except by way of stage-dressing. His SF is best described as galactic fairy-tales.
If anyone else has read his works, I would be interested to know what you though of them. If not, try picking up a Vance the next time you're at the library. His books are rather leisurely, as I've said, but if you have the time for them, they can provide you with a truly pleasurable read.
Style is the first thing that strikes you about Vance - he has a graceful, almost Victorian way of writing, complete with exquisitely balanced sentences, aptly used words and rich, compelling description. In fact, I'd suggest you avoid reading any Vance if you are currently engaged in a writing project - the rhythms of his prose have this very insidious quality!
The next thing that sets Vance apart is his world-building. His worlds are not the complex politico-ecological creations of a Frank Herbert, nor are they based on extensive social or tech extrapolations. Instead, he creates worlds that express ideas, states of mind and philosophical conceits, much like the fantastic metropolises in Italo Calvino's Imagnary Cities.
Vance then goes on to set leisurely, gracious tales in these worlds. His plots seem to be fairly straightforward, as far as theme goes - more often than not, the story revolves around an individualistic protagonist, something of an outsider, who embarks on a journey of discovery and transformation.
His works are both in the fantasy and sf genres, but there is really little difference between the two, except by way of stage-dressing. His SF is best described as galactic fairy-tales.
If anyone else has read his works, I would be interested to know what you though of them. If not, try picking up a Vance the next time you're at the library. His books are rather leisurely, as I've said, but if you have the time for them, they can provide you with a truly pleasurable read.