Should I Bother Barking at the Moon?

McMurphy

Apostate Against the Eloi
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
1,146
Location
Coffee is an addiction, black-and-white horror fil
I am, due to lack of other novels onhand, eyeing a paperback copy of Sacrament by Clive Barker that has been gathering dust on the bookshelf for some time now (mostly because I have no idea how I ended up with the copy).

Is it worth reading?

I have read other works by Clive Barker, and I am left with mixed feelings. I enjoyed his early publications, The Books of Blood, but was also left with the feeling that he was trying a bit too hard to be shocking. I also have read The Great and Secret Show and Everville but was, in the end, greatly disappointed that so many pages went toward a two novel introduction to a larger project he had in mind. In short, he is a novelist I want to like but have thus far walked away from his works with luke-warm opinions.
 
I think that's a very fair appraisal of Barker, especially the line "trying a bit too hard to be shocking".

I've read very little of his, but there was always the haunting feeling that he wasn't sure how to handle character or plotline to really push ideas. That always put me off reading more widely of his works as an author.
 
What is worth reading...if man would now that the book ratio would decrease 75%, but I can trully recomand fantasy writers as well as clasics...try reading Hemingway's "Fare well to arms"...Do you know that he joined the army only to gather information for his book?
Dostoyevsky...Tolstoi...Moliere...
Tolkien...Holdstock...
Try a searching engine (eg: dogpile)
 
I have to start out by saying that I am a Clive Barker fan. Don't know what that says about my psychological makeup - and I probably don't want to know. All I can say is that he is the only horror author whose writing has ever actually frightened me so much that I had nightmares (I can probably count the number of nightmares I've had in my life so far on one hand, so I guess that's quite an accomplishment.)

I've never read "Sacrament", so I can't give a specific recommendation for that. I think I've got it around here, so I should probably try to find it and read it. And I tried to read "The Great and Secret Show" but had to put it down because he used Simi Valley (where I grew up) as a location, and really screwed up the geography. Yeah, I know, literary license and all that - but that's one of my pet peeves about writing: if an author is going to name a real location in a book or short story, use the real place. If he or she wants to make a place up, make a name up too. That's just me, but it made the book unreadable for me.

Now, on to what I have read. "The Books of Blood", which are the first Barker I read, are a bit uneven I suppose, and deliberately shocking sometimes. But many of those stories are really quite interesting. "The Damnation Game" carried me through but wasn't really anything special. "Weaveworld" was much better, I think the first of the novels where Barker creates a unique world.

"Imajica" is very long, and I never have read the last hundred pages or so - but I think that was because I did not want the book to end. It is a very, very long book - it sometimes comes in two volumes, as a matter of fact - and probably a bit self-indulgent on Barker's part, but the world he created for that book is so fully realized that the length didn't seem to matter. I was so into reading it that I carried it on a trip to Disneyland and actually read every time I found myself waiting in a line to get on a ride.

"Coldheart Canyon" is a bit of a departure, in a way, but it is also vintage Barker. I really want to read it again, I liked it so much. It takes place mostly in a mansion in the Hollywood Hills, and is just amazing. My favorite of Barker's novels, though, is "Galilee". It has to do with a very long-lived (but not necessarily immortal) family. I don't even want to try to describe it - it has to be experienced.

Goodness. I didn't mean to go on so long. I think the bottom line on Clive Barker's writing is that he sometimes goes for the gross-out or the shocking a bit more than I am comfortable with, especially in his short stories. But - and it's a big, significant but - he is also a wonderfully imaginative writer who deserves a look beyond the gore and the outrageous.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top