You know, I keep thinking that if the writers were true to the story line and characterization they could show the real effects of Daniel's prolong absence.
For example, if in Summit he is gone for several weeks or months (not that he would really be gone in terms of the episodes) they could show how SG1 and SGC and Earth for that matter would fare without him. SG1 could encounter a great moral dilema ala The Other Side and without Daniel's input they would make a great mistake. Alienate some alies, cause terrible problems for some aliens, etc. Sam is zero is these matters, she just follows Jack blindly, as Teal'c does. Daniel is the only one who is able to see beyond, the forest and not the trees.
Maybe we will get something of that nature in Summit thouth I doubt it. Daniel is the moral conscience of SG1 and SGC.
Oh, another Daniel brilliant quality.
16. He is a great diplomat, full of tact and understanding. Didn't the Tokr'a High Honcho praised the document he drafted? Let's face it, there are many soldiers, but only one Daniel Jackson. Hey, look at Rothman, a good archeologist but certainly not the brilliant Dr. Jackson.
:rolly2:
For example, if in Summit he is gone for several weeks or months (not that he would really be gone in terms of the episodes) they could show how SG1 and SGC and Earth for that matter would fare without him. SG1 could encounter a great moral dilema ala The Other Side and without Daniel's input they would make a great mistake. Alienate some alies, cause terrible problems for some aliens, etc. Sam is zero is these matters, she just follows Jack blindly, as Teal'c does. Daniel is the only one who is able to see beyond, the forest and not the trees.
Maybe we will get something of that nature in Summit thouth I doubt it. Daniel is the moral conscience of SG1 and SGC.
Oh, another Daniel brilliant quality.
16. He is a great diplomat, full of tact and understanding. Didn't the Tokr'a High Honcho praised the document he drafted? Let's face it, there are many soldiers, but only one Daniel Jackson. Hey, look at Rothman, a good archeologist but certainly not the brilliant Dr. Jackson.
:rolly2: