They were, weren't they...I only really used them to illustrate a looooong running series, really, the only other comparison that came to mind at the time was EastEnders, which is even more inappropriateLacedaemonian said:Xena and Hercules were so poor.
n8smitty said:Bana would make an excellent Eddard, but a better John Snow. But Viggo would be great for Snow too. And who better for Red Viper than Vin Deisel?
Gotta have a movie though. No cheesy series or animated crap.
HAHA!! Actually I didn't know they filmed Xena and Hercules there, the only thing I knew about NZ before LOTR was that there is a lot of sheep there...aimee02 said:Thank goodness for Jacksons' LOTRs so now New Zealand can be known for something other than the place where they filmed Xena and Hercules!
It's clear we need a movie. NO QUESTION! The fact that any fan would conceive otherwise, causes me doubt their commitment to the series. LOTR was done beautifully by Peter Jackson, who could easily assume that role again for ASoIaF.AryaUnderfoot said:Now, this is a topic that my friend and I have talked over quite a bit.
Somehow I don't see Eric Bana as Davos; Davos is forty/fifty years old!
We thought Patrick Stewart would be good as Tywin, and someone along the lines of Sharon Stone (I know, she's too old now!) as Cersei. Also, the Draco Malfoy kid as Joffrey?
Good choice for Bronn.
My brother suggested John Malkovich(sp?) for Roose Bolton. Sounds about right to me- they both creep me out, and the voice/eyes are just about right.
On the other hand, I also agree with no-names (good ones!) being picked to play the roles. I would hate to think of Cersei as Nicole Kidman instead of a Lannister, etc, etc.
However, when it's all said and done, I'm all for the books remaining in their pure form, because I'd be really steamed if they screwed it up or left something out, or (God forbid!) got a character really wrong.