I'm not sure where the "being published" reference is on that site - there's a lot of junk waffle there - but I'd be pretty incredulous if a traditional printing publisher had picked her up.
At the end of the day - to return to knivesout comment, any kind of webpublishing *might* be useful for getting published, beause it raises your profile - and a raised profile means better marketing potential - hence, more likely that person can sell and be sold.
Hence why celebrities can fetch 6 figure sums for autobiographies, even if they cannot otherwise write.
Publishing companies do not exist to serve the most creative fiction there is - they exist to make *profit* providing for literary markets.
So if a literary agent decides that she/he can take on board a new client, then that new client has to show creative ability, and be marketable/saleable.
I actually came to the internet to create an internet presence for being published. So that if a literary agent were faced with taking on board...
...a general aspirant, who has written a quality work of fiction, and maybe even manged one or two short stories for small sff publications - - - or another general aspirant, who has also written a quality work of fiction, but also manages an active online community of over 5,000 members, and can self-market their own work to 50,000 unique visitors to their website every month
- - - - - - - - > then which aspiring writer will be most likely to be of most appeal to the publishing companies, therefore the agent?
I would doubt that the second aspirant would even be offered a contract simply on the basis of those internet figures - after all, the publisher needs a quality saleable work. But I figure such a presence and obvious markability should help tip the balance when it comes to new authors being signed up.