Dune

Lonewolf89

Fear is the mind killer.
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
1,527
I read Dune for the first time this week and loved it. While Herbert's writing isn't the best I've seen, he is good. His characters were memorable, and he wove an amazing plot. I loved reading about the Femen culture.
 
You got a really great adventure ahead of you. I really enjoy the ride.

Krystal :p
 
But one word of warning... the Dune series does take on a much more complex and interwoven story line as you proceed from the first book.

Seems that many Dune appeals to a much broader audience than the rest of the series does.

Personally, I loved the whole thing. His book The Dosadi Experiment rocked as well.
 
Well, I read them all and finish with Brian & Kevin books as well. And I'm really love them. I hope they continue writing more books based in Dune. :cool:
 
seems that Brian is coming out with another book in his Butlerian Jihad series in August this year:):rolly2:
 
Originally posted by Lonewolf89
I read Dune for the first time this week and loved it. While Herbert's writing isn't the best I've seen, he is good. His characters were memorable, and he wove an amazing plot. I loved reading about the Femen culture.

Always good to read the book, so that way if you watch the movie you won't get lost.

Stryker
 
depends on wich movie u watch, the scifi one is pretty straight forward:rolly2:
 
IMO nothing comes close to the original


Just started reading frank and brians "Man of 2 Worlds"...very good so far
 
Just a word, Jackolsman: I'm unclear from your posts whether you've read the other Dune books or not but, if you haven't read Dune Messiah, be prepared for something a bit different in both tone and intent than Dune itself, or the others in the series. It's a quieter book, in some ways and, despite the fact it's probably the least popular of them all, it is actually among my favorites in the set for its pithy probing of various ideas and issues. But it is a far cry from Dune, and quite intentionally so. I say this just to help prevent possible disappointment in a book that's quite deserving in its own right, just different...
 
J.D. Worthington: Thank you for your word, it is welcome advice for sure. You are right that I haven't read any of the other books, but I have the series up to God Emporer of Dune and plan on starting Messiah in a few days time.

I expect a change in tone after the Original Dune since it would be hard to pick up where a good and "complete feeling book" such as it left off in the first. In fact, I would be disappointed if the other books had the same feel as Dune. Nothing discourages me more in a series than a static style.

Thank you, again, for making me want to further my reading of these books even more.
 
Hello there

I have loved Dune for many years.

The sixth time I read it was on holiday last year and I suspect I'm going to sneak it into me suitcase for me olidays this year.

I actually liked the David Lynch film.

Your avatar looks like he could use a headache pill.

:)
 
i just finished messiah last night not as good as dune but it was fairly good


and the dosadi experiment i didnt enjoy at all i just couldent get my head around what was happening it kept flip floping around i duno.
 
Hello! There has been a nice little time gap since I have come and posted in here, but I had to check back in on Dune's thread. I can't believe how long it has been since I have read the first Dune book.

I have been loving this series but in a way it's putting me off reading further. I am up to book five and they are all OK, but none quite so good as the original except for Messiah. They all take a bit to digest, but when the action picks up (somehow, consistently, in the last two-thirds of the book) it holds my attention and makes me want to read more.

For now I had to take a break and pay some attention to the rest of my bookshelf! I do, however, want to re-read the original Dune, to try to recapture some of the zest that I first felt.
 
i finished heretics last week and i have to say the first one and god emperor were the best in my opinion

although miles teg is a new hero of mine
 
I started reading Dune last night.


So far its getting pretty good. As always i like when there is a world with so much history,culture. I like the philosphy,political story . Great world building.

I hope he can balance the personal story of Paul and the rest of the story.

Its funny the first few pages read like a fantasy. The special young hero in a noble family .
 
I've decided to answer a post of Connavar's from another thread, as the discussion it may start seems more appropriate here than in the "Are Books Becoming Obsolete?" thread....

Dune's Maud Dib chronicles or whatever it is that is written by The Princess annoys me alot.Its spoiling things before you read it. FH should have been alot smarter than giving away things before you read it.....

I must admit that this never bothered me. For one thing, I'd run into the technique before, with Asimov's Foundation series (as well as others); and for another, it did precisely what it was intended to do (or at least, one of the things it was intended to do): It presented Muad'Dib as an historical figure, where we were already seeing the distortions of legend surrounding the facts of Paul Atreides and his life. It allowed for a contrast between insight into him as a person and as a force of history; a man whom other people had made into a myth, so that the man was in constant danger of being lost. At the same time, Princess Irulan's own comments are slightly shaded, too, so that they aren't always reliable, which puts yet another layer of complexity on the whole thing.

To my view, Herbert was very canny in using this technique, as it allowed him to play with the reader's perceptions of the incidents of the tale and their implications (a huge theme in the series as a whole), making the assumptions a reader might form from such sources a part of the mythopoeic process, so that the reader himself becomes as prone to distort the people involved as those within the tale itself. Basically, it's a very complex and difficult technique, as it allows one to say all sorts of things that can't be said within the body of the story without bringing things to a grinding halt and editorializing it to death; yet it is fraught with dangers of becoming silly, redundant, or simply boring... all of which I feel Herbert managed to avoid because the very writers of these passages (not just Irulan) were themselves "unreliable narrators" to a degree....
 
In Foundation it was used smartly.


Sure it presents Maud Dip as historical figure.

The problem is that it can say something about his father and then the story focuses on that part of his father.

Sometimes it allures to something vague that doesnt happen as exactly in the next couple of pages but most of the time it just tells you who and what the next couple of pages will focus on. That is the annoying part. Specially when its about important parts of the story.


Other than that its a very smart political story. Even though sometimes you wanna know more about Dune and freemen quicker than focus on Paul's family and their political fight to survive. Interesting world to say the least. I hope the freemen doesnt stay a mystery in the hole book.

You know if political fantasy stories that dominate epic fantasy these days were written half as well as Dune, maybe i would enjoy and not avoid them.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top