There is going to be a sequel to 'Soylent Green'...
I'm not sure about this one. I think they should make the original book 'Make Room, Make Room' properly before they start making any sequels. The book was more of a murder-detective story, and it didn't have that punch-line, but the dystopian future was the same, and it is a future that is still possible. The book was set at the turn of the Millennium, with Earth's population reaching 7 billion, using 100% of the Earth's natural resources, and global warming an everyday reality. Only the timescale has changed because of the birth control that began in the 1960's. Harry Harrison made political and environmental points that at the time of writing were largely dismissed.
The 'Soylent Green' solution I don't think would ever be acceptable, or workable, even if it wasn't distasteful, and immoral. Even less so since 'Mad Cow Disease'. It would be a Public Health disaster.
I think this sequel will be another 'Rollerball'. They think they can update a classic old scifi film with modern special effects, but it doesn't work, because the generally miss the whole point of the film, and that crucial intent has be reduced with time anyway. In 'Rollerball' it was the future power of Corporations. Today, it is called 'Globalisation'.
Why are film makers stuck in the past?
Look at the recent scifi films that aren't franchises like Star Trek, Star Wars and LOTRs. They've used P K Dick, Stanislaw Lem, and remade 'Planet of the Apes'. Hardly cutting edge stuff.
With the success of 'The Matrix' why hasn't there instead been a rush to sign deals on new books and more Cyberpunk?
from SciFi Wire
Soylent Picks Up Story
Blade: Trinity writer/director David Goyer told SCI FI Wire that his proposed remake and update of the classic 1973 SF movie Soylent Green will pick up where the original film left off: with the well-known revelation that "Soylent Green is people!" "I will say that the reveal at the end of the first movie happened at the end of our first act," Goyer said in an interview. "So the first movie is kind of the first act of our film, and then it's about what happens afterwards."
The first movie, set in a dystopian future, centers on a cop (Charlton Heston) who investigates a murder, leading to the gruesome discovery about the principal food source of the overburdened population. The film's surprise ending is by now familiar to audiences, "of course, which is why you can't have that be the punch line anymore," Goyer said.
Goyer added that he won't write or direct the remake, but will instead act as producer under his just-signed one-year first-look deal with Warner Brothers. Goyer also wrote the script for the upcoming Batman Begins for Warner, which Christopher Nolan is directing. Blade: Trinity, the third movie in the vampire franchise, is being released by Warner's sister company, New Line, on Dec. 8.
I'm not sure about this one. I think they should make the original book 'Make Room, Make Room' properly before they start making any sequels. The book was more of a murder-detective story, and it didn't have that punch-line, but the dystopian future was the same, and it is a future that is still possible. The book was set at the turn of the Millennium, with Earth's population reaching 7 billion, using 100% of the Earth's natural resources, and global warming an everyday reality. Only the timescale has changed because of the birth control that began in the 1960's. Harry Harrison made political and environmental points that at the time of writing were largely dismissed.
The 'Soylent Green' solution I don't think would ever be acceptable, or workable, even if it wasn't distasteful, and immoral. Even less so since 'Mad Cow Disease'. It would be a Public Health disaster.
I think this sequel will be another 'Rollerball'. They think they can update a classic old scifi film with modern special effects, but it doesn't work, because the generally miss the whole point of the film, and that crucial intent has be reduced with time anyway. In 'Rollerball' it was the future power of Corporations. Today, it is called 'Globalisation'.
Why are film makers stuck in the past?
Look at the recent scifi films that aren't franchises like Star Trek, Star Wars and LOTRs. They've used P K Dick, Stanislaw Lem, and remade 'Planet of the Apes'. Hardly cutting edge stuff.
With the success of 'The Matrix' why hasn't there instead been a rush to sign deals on new books and more Cyberpunk?