I could careless about 100% historical accuracy. I think Conn is great.
Sure i might like Masters of Rome but Conn's Rome is very interesting.
I dont care much for political stuff and historical accuaracy i had read about that enough in school on my own and documentaries.
I like Conn's Rome the reason i adored the HBO tv Show Rome. It shows the world of all Romans slave,nobles etc. Thats what i want a story in their world, not Historical Fiction that read like a bio about some famous Rome and his days.
Your first post about Conn annoyed me. Why compare him to someone else? Maybe we like him just the way he is. This new even more.
If you dont like his Rome sure i can understand it but dont act like this about it to us who likes him.
Just like Simon Scarrow said when i read his notes in the end of Young Bloods, he had to change alittle parts of story to make A FICTION story in that part of history. Its about Fiction first and foremost the rest is bonus.