Talysia
Lady of Autumn
Or rather, skill vs magic.
I've often wondered whilst I was reading Eddings' books about the difference between his characters that use magic (ie the Will and the Word) and those who use weapons or skills, (such as fighting ability, stealth or horsemanship).
Whilst I like the big magical showdowns, I find that I prefer reading about the little talents that the other characters have. In some cases, it makes them seem more human, especially considering the things they achieve without the use of magic.
Should more recognition go to the characters without magic, or is the balance just right?
I've often wondered whilst I was reading Eddings' books about the difference between his characters that use magic (ie the Will and the Word) and those who use weapons or skills, (such as fighting ability, stealth or horsemanship).
Whilst I like the big magical showdowns, I find that I prefer reading about the little talents that the other characters have. In some cases, it makes them seem more human, especially considering the things they achieve without the use of magic.
Should more recognition go to the characters without magic, or is the balance just right?