Black Man by Richard Morgan - The Best SF Novel of 2007?

Werthead

Lemming of Discord
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,188
Richard Morgan's latest novel, Black Man, is an precursor of sorts to his Takeshi Kovacs trilogy, set 400 years before those novels in a United States torn apart by religious, political and sociological strife. It is simultaneously a mystery novel, a high-octane action story and a deep examination of character and motive. It is incendiary stuff that will no doubt deeply offend a lot of people (particularly those on the extreme right living in the southern United States), but it is also brilliantly written, deeply compelling and at times tremendously emotionally affecting. It is one of the most intense books I've read in a long time. It also by far the best thing that Morgan has ever done (and his earlier books weren't exactly poor either).

The book has been renamed (with good reason) Thirteen for the US market, where it will be published at the end of June (it's out in the UK in May). A more in-depth review of the book can be found at my blog.

EDIT: Sorry, I'm losing track of the rules. Is it okay to post links to longer reviews elsewhere? I'm sure I asked this before and got the okay, but just want to be sure.
 
Last edited:
No, but frankly I consider it highly unlikely, given the number of really quality books released in one year, that we'll see anything better than this (and I'm hoping multiple authors will prove me wrong). However, there is one stand-out candidate in books due for release this year that could eclipse this: Ian McDonald's Brasyl. I also wouldn't count out Peter F. Hamilton's The Dreaming Void either (although Judas Unchained was not all it could be).

I also specified SF only. Fantasy is a whole other ball game, of course.
 
"Don't you think it's a tad silly to proclaim a book THE book of this year when we're only approaching a 3rd of the way through the year? You don't work for the publisher do you?" = I think he means he really really liked it.
 
Weeeee!
New Richard Morgan! Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy!
Is it actually set in the same universe as Altered Carbon? I know that Market Forces is set in the same universe (though much MUCH earlier).
 
Well I liked Altered Carbon (and the other Kovacs books) - in much the same way as I like other gumshoe novels. It struck me that it read more like standard gumshoe fair (and that's not necessarily a bad thing) that had been given the trappings of SF*. In my opinion it was very much of that genre - and not SF. I enjoyed - it passed the time. So you will have to forgive me if I think that flag-waving it as the best book of the year seems a little over the mark.

Of course there is still the possibility that it will... In which case I will definitely salute Richard Morgan.

Out of curiosity - what other books have been compared with this that will allow it's greatness to be a valid statement?



* There is a term for this but I forget what it is.
 
Weeeee!
New Richard Morgan! Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy!
Is it actually set in the same universe as Altered Carbon? I know that Market Forces is set in the same universe (though much MUCH earlier).

It is set in the same universe, in the year 2107 (or 400+ years before Altered Carbon). There are lots of links and nods to the later books, but reading them is certainly not necessary to enjoy the novel.

Well I liked Altered Carbon (and the other Kovacs books) - in much the same way as I like other gumshoe novels. It struck me that it read more like standard gumshoe fair (and that's not necessarily a bad thing) that had been given the trappings of SF*. In my opinion it was very much of that genre - and not SF. I enjoyed - it passed the time. So you will have to forgive me if I think that flag-waving it as the best book of the year seems a little over the mark.

Of course there is still the possibility that it will... In which case I will definitely salute Richard Morgan.

Out of curiosity - what other books have been compared with this that will allow it's greatness to be a valid statement?

Well, the book stands up by itself. Comparing and contrasting one book to another to determine if you'll enjoy it or not is a perilous reviewing technique (although one I have used before). The fairest comparison is to the other books the same author has written, in which case Black Man is by far the best book Morgan has written.

It is also a lot more SF. Your earlier point is well-taken, that Altered Carbon basically felt at times a detective novel with a sentient hotel instead of room service maids and needlecasting rather than travelling by jumbo jet. Black Man addresses more fundamental concerns of social change and evolution and the future development of religion, ethics, business and politics.
 
I really enjoyed this. I didn't think that it was as good as Altered Carbon, but it is a great read. Like the idea of Jesusland, but it terrifies me. My only complaint was that there was too much swearing.
 
I missed this thread so i must say that Gav was really silly to say Altered Carbon was more crime,noir than SF. That far future world with the digitilized minds,cyperpunk elements,super soldiers ?? Yeah sure...

My brother who dont read sf usually thought that world was freaky and laughed just now when i told someone said it was not enough SF ;)
 
I agree with Conn: the SF elements were very much to the fore in Altered Carbon. (Although it's true that Morgan was able to evoke the feel of a gumshoe novel.)


Back on thread: I'm hoping Werthead and Rodders are right about Black Man, because I'll be reading it as soon as I've finished C.J.Cherryh's Hammerfall.
 
I'll add in another voice for Black Man being good.
I always put Altered Carbon as a SF Crime-Noir mets Cyperpunk, and think that Black Man is more of a straight SF Thriller. Both hugely enjoyable, in different ways.

I am slightly peeved that my copy of Black Man is in a different cover style to the rest of my Morgan books. I liked the reflective covers of the others, and my Black Man is just a boring plain cover in comparison. Not been able to find one is the same style as the others.
 
Is this a good book? A lot of people say it has tons of action and a good story. I got it with Market Forces. Are they really that good?
 
Give it a go Biodroid. I enjoyed both Black Man and Market Forces. Of the two, Black man was definately the better. Market Forces was interesting, but didn't seem too believable. Sort of Mad Max meets Wall Street.
 
Richard Morgan's latest novel, Black Man, is an precursor of sorts to his Takeshi Kovacs trilogy, set 400 years before those novels in a United States torn apart by religious, political and sociological strife.


Hey Wert.

Are you sure its based on the Takeshi Kovacs stuff? I can swear I read an interview where he directly replied that it was not a conscious prequel to Takeshi Kovacs, although there might be some similarities (hinting at Mars exploration ect.). I guess I'll have to go hunting for the interview again.
 
I am getting into it now. Carl is a bit of an iffy character, not sure what to make of him yet. Like the style and the prose is quite good too.
 
Now I've finally read Black Man, I can see why Werthead was so enthusiastic: the book is really good: exciting and thought-provoking and it all seems to hand together.

What more could you want?
 
This is the third book by this author I have read, the first two being Altered Carbon and Broken Angels (only the second of which is reviewed here – I read the first one before starting this blog). Black Man, known as Thirteen in the USA, was published in 2007 and won the 2008 Arthur C Clarke award. Unlike Morgan's other books I have read, this is a stand-alone novel.

This story is set on Earth a couple of centuries into the future. A thin but breathable atmosphere has been generated on Mars, which has been settled but is still very much a tough frontier world. The USA has split apart into the the Confederated Republic (a bigoted and backward state popularly known as Jesusland), the north-eastern Union (closely associated with the UN) and the Pacific Rim states, based on commerce. Genetic engineering had produced a warrior race known as Variant Thirteen to fight humanity's wars, a throwback to the ferocious, asocial individualism of primitive humans with characteristics which had historically been bred out of humanity in the interests of an urban civilisation. They had proved uncontrollable, and were soon demonised and referred to as "twists". The survivors had been given a choice: live in a secure reservation in a barren part of Earth, or be transported to Mars.

Carl Marsalis is a Thirteen, one who earns a living with the UN as a bounty hunter tracking down his few fellow warriors still at large. He is also black, and meets prejudice on both counts. He is the focus of the action, along with an assorted cast of detectives, COLIN operatives (Colony Initiative) and criminals. A ship from Mars has crashed into the Pacific and it is soon discovered that the crew, supposedly in cold sleep for the journey, had been killed and eaten. It doesn't take long to realise that the perpetrator of this atrocity was a Thirteen escaping from Mars; he is now in North America, carrying out what appear to be a random series of murders. Marsalis is hired to track him down, but finds himself involved in an increasingly complex situation with one plot twist after another.

There are obvious echoes of Bladerunner, but the plot of the book is a lot harder to follow and Black Man is frankly too cluttered with people, themes and events. I had a particular problem with the author's tendency to introduce minor characters briefly near the beginning then not mention them again until much later, by which time I had forgotten who they were and spent an exasperating amount of time trawling back through the book trying to find out.

While the descriptive writing is good and a lot of space is devoted to developing the main characters and their relationships, the story seems strangely impersonal. It is told in the third person and there is little sense of association with any of the characters; the viewpoint keeps switching but is principally that of a dispassionate narrator. We are left to learn about the characters mainly through their words and actions, rather than getting much insight into their thoughts. Given that the personality of the Thirteens in general and Marsalis in particular is the key plot element in the book, it might have been better to let the reader to see the world more through his eyes.

I was sufficiently engaged to read to the end, but only just, and it is unlikely that I will want to read this one again.

(An extract from my SFF blog: Science Fiction & Fantasy)
 
Do you need to have read the Kovacs series for this one to make sense? I read Altered Carbon some time ago and enjoyed it but haven't gotten round to picking up any of the others. This sounds right up my alley though.
 
I hadn't seen this thread before, so thanks for reviving it. I am a fan of Morgans SF, but not his fantasy.

Black Man is a totaly stand alone novel and is not set in or related to the Takeshi Kovacs novels. It is not set in the same world history. Neither is Market Forces (he makes an in joke in MF about Altered Carbon, where the protagonist is reading it.)

Black Man is okay. I enjoyed it, but less than the Kovacs or MF stories. Apparently he is working on a sequal to Black Man though.

So, no, you don't need to read anything else by Morgan, and yes, it is worth reading.
 
I've always wanted Morgan to write a story going a lot deeper into things casually mentioned in Altered Carbon. The orbital forts left around various worlds by the 'Martians' in particular. Super satellites blasting out death rays at spacecraft so only certain landing areas and approach paths can be used. First found around Mars but nobody knows why, or why they are spread through known space. Surely at some time he needs to write a novel about this enigma?
 

Similar threads


Back
Top