The Incredible Hulk (2008)

What do you think about Marvel's decision to to 'redo' the film

  • Not a good idea

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • A great idea

    Votes: 3 14.3%
  • It's ok

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Too soon

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • There's a Hulk redo?

    Votes: 7 33.3%

  • Total voters
    21

jayce77

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2007
Messages
9



Summary: Not happy with the previous version of the Hulk, Marvel has promised a re-do for the sequel. The "requel" promises less of Ang Lee's greek tragedy and more "HULK SMASH!" The Incredible Hulk redo may feature the emergence of the grey-skinned Hulk. Possible bad guys include The Leader and The Abomination.
Director: Louis Leterrier
Cast: TBA
Producers: Avi Arad, Kevin Feige and Gale Anne Hurd.



Release Date: June 13th, 2008 - Universal
 
When you say redo, are they retelling the Hulk's origin? in the same veign Batman Begins was to Tim Burton's Batman?

i quite liked the Hulk...
 
I think it's a bit too soon. I know it's been a couple of years now, but I can still remember it. I guess I wouldn't mind if they made it closer to the original Hulk concept, though.
 
Wasn't sure about this to start with but with Edward Norton (fantastic actor who generally puts everyting into his roles) on board as Dr Banner its getting interesting :D
 
I'd prefer it if they left Hulk as having introduced the character and moved on with a different direction from there, I thought that was one thing that the latest Superman did well (ok so it hardley headed off in new directions but atleast it wasn't just another telling of the birth of superman). Would be interesting to see peoples reactions to a grey Hulk, to most of the world the Hulk has always been Green.

I rememeber talking to one of my friends about Hulk when it was released. He hated how 'over the top' it was with the Hulk this massive figure that runs super fast, jumps mountains and smashes helicopters..... For him the Hulk had always been a painted Lou Ferringo :) .
 
I hated the over use and sometimes pretty damn poor use of CGI. Also the way they really dumbed everything down. Nick Nolte's cringe-worthy line "My Bruce"...Christ, give me a break!

So, with that said, they can't really do anything worse, so yeah have a crack at it.
 
I hated the over use and sometimes pretty damn poor use of CGI. Also the way they really dumbed everything down...
Dumbed everything down from what? I've read some of the Hulk stuff and never found anything so particularly deep about it. In fact I thought that the movie had a more meditative and serious air than what those comics ever suggested.
 
Director Interview

I think Hulk fans will be pleased by what the director, Louis Leterrier, said to Wizard magazine about the upcoming "relaunch" of the film franchise for Marvel Comics' favorite Green Giant. Visit wizarduniverse for this interview and other information regarding the movie.

Wizard Universe Magazine said:
"2008 PREVIEW: THE ‘INCREDIBLE HULK’ MOVIE: Director Louis Leterrier gets mean and green with Ed Norton, the Abomination and tons of fanboy Easter eggs"

By Danny Spiegel


Don’t make director Louis Leterrier angry. You won’t like him when he’s angry.

Although, to be honest, we have no idea what he’s like when he’s angry, because when we spoke with him recently about helming “The Incredible Hulk”—hitting theaters June 13—he was perfectly nice and charming (the French accent also helped). Since this is a total relaunch for the character, we thought we might irritate him slightly with questions about Ang Lee’s 2003 film about the green goliath, but, really, everything was fine.

“I just came back from Brazil,” says Leterrier, “so I’m a little frazzled by the whole shooting experience. It’s a big movie. We got everything we wanted and more. We didn’t cheap out.”

Leterrier, best known for the action-packed “Transporter” films, is truly excited about his new Bruce Banner (Edward Norton, who also co-wrote the screenplay), Betty Ross (Liv Tyler), General Thunderbolt Ross (William Hurt), and of course his new villain, Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth), the Abomination-to-be.

WIZARD: Next year’s “The Incredible Hulk,” with Edward Norton as Bruce Banner, is a total relaunch for the franchise, but are there any elements from the 2003 film?

LETERRIER: No, not at all, but that being said, I have huge respect for Ang Lee and his movies, so I didn’t want to offend people that loved the first movie. We don’t go against anything that the first one established, but it’s brand new, a fresh start.

Will we see any of the Hulk’s origin retold here?

LETERRIER: No, but you’ll understand through memories and flashbacks.

What’s the story of this film?

LETERRIER: It’s the story of a more weathered and savvy Bruce Banner [and] his drive is to find a cure. [And] it’s a manhunt. General Ross is the villain, but the Abomination—Emil Blonsky—was who Marvel wanted to put in this chapter of our new saga because he’s an enemy that can actually threaten the Hulk. I didn’t feel in Ang Lee’s “Hulk,” for example, that there was any threat. He was invincible. So with Abomination there’s a monster that can actually kill him when he’s in the Hulk form.

How are you handling the Abomination’s origin?

LETERRIER: Emil Blonsky, when he first came about, was very much a Cold War-painted Russian spy. We couldn’t do this. We created a plot having Emil Blonsky as a soldier realizing that he was at the end of his career, physically, and meeting the Hulk and seeing the power that Bruce Banner had and deciding to ask if he could go one-on-one against him because he had nowhere to go. That’s why we decided to cast Tim Roth, because he’s got that vicious, smart way about him.

Does Emil subject himself to gamma exposure, or is Emil a guinea pig?

LETERRIER: He subjects himself. It’s gamma-based. It’s very important that both monsters are the same thing. Both men are opposite sides of the same coin. Bruce Banner doesn’t like this power within, and the other man, Emil Blonsky, wants this power but cannot get it and eventually will meet somebody that can give it to him.


Will the Abomination have those crazy ears like in the comic?

LETERRIER: Yeah, we are keeping the ears. We’re making them a little different [though]. Actually, when I was hired, I came to Marvel with my own take, a more modern take, on the monster. There was something reptilian about the original Abomination that didn’t make sense. There was no reptile mix in his origin, so I just changed it and made it like the “über-human.” It’s a human that was injected in the wrong places with something, and these places are growing differently. It still has the general shape of the Abomination, but there’s something realistic that I wanted to put in it.

Can we be secure, though, that he is still disgustingly ugly?

LETERRIER: [Laughs] Oh, yeah. Actually, this morning we were doing visual effects, [and] we were like, “Ooh, a little bit too ugly, actually.” We are taking it back.


Tim Roth is a very committed actor. In that spirit, is he stomping around the set yelling at people?

LETERRIER: [Laughs] No, not at all. Actually, Tim had a blast. It was a nice change because he’s used to very serious and hard roles, and for him it was a vacation. He’s the one who wanted to do more of his own stunts and have more fun because he said, “I want my kids to see that.” He had so much fun.

Will the character of Samuel Sterns be appearing as the Leader, or will he be set up for a possible sequel?


LETERRIER: He’s being set up. He’s the Wizard of Oz of our whole story.

Is he creating Abomination?

LETERRIER: Uh, possibly…the Abomination is a creation of many things gone wrong at the same time.

But Sterns doesn’t get exposed to gamma rays in this movie?

LETERRIER: No, we set him up for the sequel. But it’s like [Doc] Samson, same thing. We set him up for the sequel. I didn’t want to put too many villains [in the film]. But I wanted Bruce Banner to cross their path to introduce them for future episodes.


In terms of the look and shape of the Hulk, how would you compare the CGI from the 2003 film to yours?

LETERRIER: In the first one, they did a great job [but] there was no weight to him. He was flying around and it was very poetic, but our movie is grittier. When I offered my services to do the job, I said I want everything to be gritty, darker, even a little scarier. Frankenstein, King Kong…these monsters are pretty scary. They’re not smooth-looking, fluorescent-green-looking characters. They’re pretty dark and, still, within, there’s a tenderness and a humanity that you can see through them.


In the first one, the Hulk was sort of an extrapolation of Eric Bana’s face. Is it the same here with Edward Norton?

LETERRIER: We actually didn’t start [from] Edward’s face because we started the Hulk’s design before we got Edward. So once we were comfortable with the overall design, then we added some of Edward’s features in it. Like, for example, in our movie, he has a scar on the cheek and his jaw, and he has a little mole on the right side of his mouth. We added that on. Very subtle things. And his haircut, obviously.


I hear that the Hulk in this version has a mullet. Is that right or is that just a bad rumor?

LETERRIER: A mullet? No, no. [Laughs] I make fun of that. I say sometimes that he has a mullet. No, he doesn’t have a mullet at all. He has longer hair because Bruce Banner is on the run and he doesn’t get his hair cut often. He has very dirty hair, but no mullet at all. You know, it’s funny that you say that because this morning I was saying, “Lengthen the back of the hair but be careful so it doesn’t look like a mullet.”

Were you a comic fan growing up?

LETERRIER: Yeah, I was, but it was more the French or Belgian comic book school, you know, like Blueberry and Tintin.


What was your first exposure to the Hulk?

LETERRIER: Well, we had those comic books, but my real first exposure was the TV show. That’s why it’s so close to my heart. It’s very…human. It’s really about the character, the Bill Bixby/David Banner character.

Any favorite episode?
LETERRIER: When he’s a bouncer at a disco. It’s really funny. [Laughs]

Is there any way you can get that sad “walking away” music from the end of each episode into the film?

LETERRIER: Actually, yeah. We got the rights so that’ll be in the movie. The composer is Joe Harnell. “Dah dah dah…” Let me play it for you. Hold on, I’ve got it. Listen. [Plays sad Hulk music] That’s the one! [Laughs]That’s awesome. Have you ever had the opportunity to talk with Kenneth Johnson, the executive producer of that series?

LETERRIER: No, but, actually, we have a friend in common so I definitely want to meet him. Now I know Lou Ferrigno pretty well. It was so great to meet Lou Ferrigno. It’s so weird when you get to meet your childhood heroes. It’s, like, “Oh my God …”


So I take it that Lou Ferrigno has a cameo?

LETERRIER: Yeah. It’s a fun cameo. It’s a little bit meatier than what he had in the first one [as a security guard]. He’s just the nicest guy and he was so excited to come on board. It was funny to see Edward Norton and Lou Ferrigno act together. It’s two different techniques: Edward is very thought out—and Lou, it was just, like…him. I loved it.

Is Stan Lee making a cameo?

LETERRIER: Yeah, but Stan Lee is the busiest man alive. He didn’t make the cameo yet but we haven’t finished shooting. I spoke to him the other day and whenever we do [another] shoot, he’ll do a cameo there.

So you haven’t met him in person yet.

I’m very shy and very intimidated by Stan Lee. did the [San Diego] Comic-Con panel and he came on the Iron Man panel [separately] but I was backstage and I could see him. I was like, “It’s Stan Lee—I’m so excited!”

Are there any special Hulk comics that were a particular inspiration for you?

LETERRIER: Hulk: Gray, the Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale one, was a big inspiration for me. It’s so graphic and so perfect in its composition. That’s what got me back into the mood of the Hulk. When my agent called me and said, “Do you want to remake the Hulk?” I went to a comic book store and I picked up Hulk: Gray. That’s what made me hungry to do another Hulk movie. So there will be Hulk: Gray references, but also there will be Bruce Jones, Peter David [references]…It’s chock-full of references.


[I originally found this interview on the Incredible Hulk forum entitled hulkspace.com... a place for smashing!!]
 
Dumbed everything down from what? I've read some of the Hulk stuff and never found anything so particularly deep about it. In fact I thought that the movie had a more meditative and serious air than what those comics ever suggested.

Not a particularly big fan of the Hulk overall, but there have been times when the comic did get into deeper waters, and showed some layering. Interestingly, a lot of my favorites with it were from the years Thomas was writing so much for Marvel. There were some very nice things coming down the pike with the series then....

As for a new Hulk movie... I'm sceptical, to say the least. And I absolutely despised Ang Lee's film. Good basic idea, but taken to such extremes that I found it annoying and distracting -- far too "flash-bang" and absolutely nothing to back it up with....
 
As for a new Hulk movie... I'm sceptical, to say the least. And I absolutely despised Ang Lee's film. Good basic idea, but taken to such extremes that I found it annoying and distracting -- far too "flash-bang" and absolutely nothing to back it up with....

There were very few real fans of the Ang Lee's film on both the audience and studio fronts. Reading the interview above and talking to a friend who was working on the digital arts of the film, the Hulk relaunch is going to be very different in approach and akin to the Batman Begins grittiness.
 
Last edited:
I'm certainly willing to give it a shot; I just remain sceptical about this for the time being. (I will, however, be more than happy to be pleasantly surprised....):)
 
Is there any need? The other one was silly enough! I know its SF and Hollywood and you're supposed to suspend belief and forget that its not meant to be feasible but the bit where he picks up the tank and throws it without moving an inch from his spot,just looked badly done. For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction,regardless of how strong you are! As Scotty would say,you cannae change the laws of physics!
 
Wasn't sure about this to start with but with Edward Norton (fantastic actor who generally puts everyting into his roles) on board as Dr Banner its getting interesting :D
Agreed. Just as long as the film isn't too over-CGI'd. Above all else. that's what scuppered Lee's version, IMHO.
 
Is there any need? The other one was silly enough! I know its SF and Hollywood and you're supposed to suspend belief and forget that its not meant to be feasible but the bit where he picks up the tank and throws it without moving an inch from his spot,just looked badly done. For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction,regardless of how strong you are! As Scotty would say,you cannae change the laws of physics!

For the average viewer, there probably is very little need for a second chance. For Marvel and fans of the comics, they feel cheated out of what could have been a very gripping film franchise.

The physics behind the Incredible Hulk has always been questionable. Why stop at the throwing of the tank? How about his ability to jump hundreds of miles in a single bound. Despite immense strength, it is not feasible that a body could project itself that distance. It is a mainstream movie about a mainstream comic book character. The laws of physics are always being broken in films. I'd rather see it done in this sort of project then some tear-jerker centered around World War II fighter planes.
 
If you're willing to accept the basic premise of The Hulk comic you should be prepared to accept just about everything. Newton's laws are far behind in the list of things that defy credibility here.
 
I didn't mind the Hulk movie but it was far from the best adaptation I've seen. Interestingly enough it's being shown tonight on local TV during our traditional non-ratings period, which probably says something about the film's lack of popularity.
 
2008 Incredible Hulk Trailer

At the official website of the 2008 Incredible Hulk film starring Edward Norton as Bruce Banner, we can see the first trailer, which offers more shots of the Green Giant than I would have bet on.

What do the rest of you think?

Personally, I am excited about the relaunch of the Marvel Comics character. After such a less than lack luster attempt by Ang Lee back in 2003, a darker and grittier version, which what the director has repeatedly promised in interviews, pitting the anti hero against the Abomination and setting up a sequel with The Leader is very welcomed from where I sit.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top