(And another: I'd have thought Py was best placed to get this, what with that shortened course in Religious Education to his name...)
(And another: I'd have thought Py was best placed to get this, what with that shortened course in Religious Education to his name...)
I'm very confident the answer "no" is correct, but I can't back it up with a quote.Can you give me an example of JRRT eschewing the usual pluralisation of a Latin-derived noun?
Very useful, thank you!it's to be hoped you aren't an arachniphobic pteronarcophobe...
However, don't forget that the book is aimed at fairly young children, who may not have learnt about Latin plurals yet (if ever.).Doesn't it just? And it's not as if fungi is is a particularly pedantic plural