I just finished Earth Abides and loved it. Very thoughtful, more somber than expected, and often very melancholy. A very deliberate pace. There is no “Mad Max” to speak of; this is a book that seeks to grapple with the fundamental issues of what makes a civilization.
There are really two major themes. First, it is a look at how man's conquering of Mother Nature is temporary at best. Take away man, and Earth’s memory of man will be soon forgotten. There are superb passages describing how various things – animals, farms, cities, roads – mankind has influenced and/or created would be impacted by our disappearance. At the same time, the book deals with civilization. What are the fundamentals of civilization? What keeps people together? What prompted the creation of tribes, religion, superstition, and war? There are few clear-cut answers, which makes for compelling thinking material. Worth reading.
I’ve read Brin’s The Postman and think it is full of missed potential. Very unfortunate. The post-apocalypse society painted by David Brin is well-constructed and believable. There are lots of little details scattered here and there that hint at the larger world of turmoil beyond the confines of the story. The first third of this book was great reading. Unfortunately, is leaps into a side story regarding a town with some AI computer (or so it seems), and again into a story about augmented super soldiers. The final stages of this book read like action movie rubbish. What began as a book with a great setting and fantastic premise lost its focus halfway through and never really recovered. I didn’t hate this, but I wanted to like it a lot more than I did.
King’s The Stand might be the most popular post-apocalypse book out there. It’s long. Arguably too long. Thankfully, the sheer bulk of this book does not detract from King's surprisingly good characterization and the compelling plot hook - a virus that wipes out just about the whole world save a small percentage of the population. Both are handled well, with believable people and graphic depictions of the aftershocks of such a virus.
But in the end, when metaphysical religious mumbo jumbo takes over, the epic falters.
The depictions of the virus' impact on the world are scary and well portrayed. The first half, maybe two-thirds, of the book sail along briskly despite the time King takes to dwell in insignificant character details. The latter portions of the book, however, are a disappointment. This strong tale of survival ultimately turns into a hokey quasi-religious showdown. By this point, you're turning pages not because you want to see the story, but because you have already read 700 pages. A very poor end to an otherwise good book.
If you’re going to read The Stand, try to find the originally released “cut” version, because the uncut version now on the shelves simply has too much filler.
I also recently read Heinlein’s Farnham’s Freehold, the first half of which is essentially a post-apocalypse book (with a twist). I wholly dismiss the naysayers who claim the latter portions of this book are racist … they clearly miss the point. But that’s not relevant to the “apocalypse” part. This begins as the story of a small group of people who survive a nuclear war, and what they do to survive on their own without technology and the civilization they knew to aid them. I enjoyed this a lot.
Lucifer's Hammer and Damnation Alley are both on my "near future" to-be-read list.