Tracing the Hallows. POSSIBLE SPOILERS

[Abbot]

Ok I just wanted to see if i got this correct.

The are 3 hallows:
= The wand
=The ressurection stone
= and te cloak.

I wanted to know if the hallows actualy belonged to certain ppl like wat hauses and if at all they belonged to some founders of hogwarts.

Now we know the cloak was harrys cause it was passed down, So thats griffindor. Is harry related to godric Griffindor somehow?

We know that The stone was slytherins somehow cause its mentoned that it was Voldemorts fathers lineage passed down from salasar slytherin.

Who could the last peverell actually have belonged to if it was passed down from herritage instead of battles?

My guess is the Weasleys or Malfoys, Although the Malfoys are related to the blacks they are the only pure-blood wizarding family left that could possible be related to one of the peverell brothers and same goes with the Weasleys, The are much more pure-blood then alot of the other families.

Any ideas?

 

[PTeppic]

There a few web pages which have wizarding family trees on.

As also mentioned in other threads here, for the families bothered about staying "pure blood" there are few other such families left so tend to inter-marry (sounds better than inter-breed!) meaning the true blood families do tend to be inter-related.

Although families tend to stick to the same house, it's not compulsory: Sirius Black was a Gryffindor, yet the Black family is generally Slytherin. Similarly in the epilogue Harry says he has no qualms (now) about his son being in Slytherin.

I believe the question you've posed is fundamentally flawed anyway: I think the Peverells came AFTER the founders. Inscribed village tomb-stones only came along some time after Christian churches and so on, whilst Hogwarts has been founded since before William of Normandy came across the Channel for his rather rowdy beach party near Hastings. They might have died "centuries ago" as stated by Hermione, referring to the genealogy book, but I don't think it was more than 1000 years ago.

Also, the Slytherin connection to Tom Riddle was through his mother's family (not his father who was a Muggle; that's the irony, he was only ever half-blood whilst Harry was first generation pure blood) and the Malfoys don't seem to be the only pure-blood family, just one of the more well-known and powerful (Macnair, Crabbe, Goyle and families of all the other death-eaters mentioned in the seven books; probably even families like Borgle and Burke).

 

[The Ace]

No, Lily Evans was a muggle, (Aunt Petunia is her sister) Although the Potters were pure-blooded, as are the Weasleys. Harry's father was descended from the Peverells through the maternal line, as were the Gaunts.

 

[Abbot]

Lilly evens was a mud-blood, Meaning harry potter was 3/4 pureblood.

 

[PTeppic]

No, Lily Evans was a muggle

Muggle-born, though in herself a witch. Otherwise she couldn't have been at Hogwarts. Abbott's maths says it better, though we're only assuming James was son of two magic folk.

 

[Majimaune]

I think it does say in one of the books that James was pure-blood.....