Black Sun Rising by Celia Friedman

[Werthead]

From the blog:

Twelve hundred years ago, a sleeper ship from Earth deposited several thousand colonists on the wild, untamed world of Erna. Seismically active Erna is a harsh planet to survive on, made worse by the presence of the Fae, a source of energy that permeates the elements and can be harnessed by certain humans to further their own ends. Unfortunately, the Fae can also be manipulated subconciously, resulting in the people's fears and nightmares taking on solid form.

With all high technology lost in the birth of a new religion, the colonists of Erna have descended to a Renaissance level of technology, although retaining certain advanced medical, astronomical and scientific knowledge. Damien Kilcannon Vryce, a warrior-priest of the Church and one of the few churchmen able to wield the Fae, arrives in the city of Jaggonath to adopt a new and difficult role in the Church hierarchy. However, when a local Fae-wielder is brutally attacked and her ability to wield the Fae is neutralised, Damien is drawn into a lengthy quest that will lead into the dangerous rakhlands to confront a powerful sorcerer. Along the way Damien is forced into a most uneasy alliance with the cold and arrogant Gerald Tarrant, a powerful wielder of the Fae who has secrets of his own...

Black Sun Rising (1991) is the first novel in Celia Friedman's Coldfire Trilogy. This SF-epic fantasy hybrid was very highly regarded upon its initial release in the United States, but oddly it wasn't until a year or so ago that Orbit finally published the first UK edition.

The novel is a mixture of the familiar and the use of more original tropes, although the familiar does win out in the end. This is a quest story, with an interesting band of 'heroes' setting out to right a great wrong and travel across a vast chunk of countryside in the process. The world of Erna has some interesting facets to it but the travelling makes for the more tedious part of the book, especially the endless mucking around in caves. Page after page of description of rocks and tunnels does not make for entertaining reading.

Fortunately, Friedman's characters are an interesting, if largely unlikeable bunch. She isn't afraid to kill off major characters and paints them in convincing detail. Less impressive is that secondary characters are not very well developed at all. The rakhs' motivations in particular could have been fleshed out more and one key character who hangs around for a good 150-200 or so pages doesn't even get a name.

The plotline is intriguing and there's no denying that the worldbuilding is quite well-thought-out. The cliffhanger ending comes out of nowhere and the enforced humour at the end of the book doesn't really work as well as intended. That said, the book was enjoyable enough to make me look forward to picking up the second volume, When True Night Falls.

Black Sun Rising (***) was surprisingly disappointing for such a widely-acclaimed novel. The author is a good writer but needs to lighten up a bit. The world is unrelentingly grim but Friedman isn't in the same calibre as Scott Bakker, who can make such a world come alive and become compelling.

 

[GOLLUM]

I've got this trilogy and I think things improve as you move along. Been a while since I've checked these books out though, so maybe deserves another look.

 

[Max the Mediocre]

IMO, things don't improve as you move along, for the simple reason that each novel has the same basic plot.

That being, quest through desolate land to get to the Big Bad. In books 1 & 2, defeat of Big Bad is followed by revelation that--shock--there is a Bigger Bad in an even more desolate land halfway around the world.

Repetitiveness is bad, m'kay.

Wert's last paragraph more or less sums up my view of the trilogy as a whole; ridiculously overrated, but still worth reading.

 

[GOLLUM]

IMO, things don't improve as you move along, for the simple reason that each novel has the same basic plot.

You may be right, it's been a while since I've looked at these. I agree it's overrated if you go by some people's comments.

 

[Michael01]

That figures. I've read the first two books so far and really enjoyed them. Why is it that I rarely agree with the reveiwers, I wonder?

 

[GOLLUM]

That figures. I've read the first two books so far and really enjoyed them. Why is it that I rarely agree with the reveiwers, I wonder?

Well I'm glad you enjoyed the first 2 books in the series. As to why you rarely agree with reviewers I don't know but that doesn't mean any one person is anymore right or wrong than anyone else of course. It's good to have differences of opinion and healthy debate I think.

BTW welcome to the forums, I haven't seen you around before....

 

[Werthead]

I did enjoy it and I'll pick up the second one. With me, three stars means 'above average', not 'it sucks like the Abyss' which seems to be the attitude of some Amazon reviewers