The Belgoriad

Ole Pete

Ole Pete
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
11
Location
I'm old but still spry, and I hold me head high,
Have tried twice to read the Belgoriad, but both times I can't seem to get drawn into the story enough to read the whole thing...My mate says its great, but well I've tried but it just hasn't captured my interest that much. I've heard mixed things about Eddings overall, but am unsure whether I will try another of his tales or not at this point...
Regards,
Ole Pete
 
I liked the Belgariad, and in spite of some of his other books it remains a favourite for me.

Anyway, welcome to the Chronicles!:)
 
The belgariad starts slowly but it picks up.
Thry the elenium form Eddings. The action and suspense is there from the start.
 
I agree. most of Pawn of Prophecy is taken over describing Garion's childhood, and about a quarter of Enchanter's Endgame is taken over with the aftermath of the defeat of Torak and the big battle, i.e. weddings and so on.
 
I've read the Belgariad and the Mallorean hundreds of times each. The Belgariad does, indeed, start out slow, but sometimes the little details are necessary. When you get to the end, you'll find you can't wait for the next one.
 
I also enjoy the Belgariad and Mallorean. If you are able to muddle through all the "set up" stage (the first half of Pawn of Prophecy or so) the story gets going.
 
The Belgariad/Mallorean/Elenium/Tamuli are great series.Belgarath the Sorcerer was a great guide/reference for the Belgariad and a great precursor for the Mallorean.'08.
 
Especially since Belgarath was an appendix to the series, same with Polgara. preludes to both were set up after the events of the Mallorean.

I ended up working with the book club edition of Belgariad. Books 1-3 in Vol 1, 4 and 5 in vol 2. I found myself in Queen of sorcery before I'd even realized I'd gone into a second book.
 
I read and adored the Belgariad when I was thirteen. In fact, it was the series that got me into fantasy big time.

However, it's not the kind of thing I would read these days.
 
I am not surprised. I recently finished Belgariad and it was awful. The basic plot of the first book lets us view the world thru the eyes of a 15 year old boy protaganist ("Garion") with a hidden past. We're given a few hints but never find out any thing of real consequence about that past throughout the entire book. He's curious so he's constantly asking friends and his guardians about his past, his guardians, etc., etc. and why they're on this journey and then consistently being told not to ask questions. Consequently the reader doesn't end up knowing much more than he does because we're living vicariously thru him. I have never read a book like this. It's absolutely ridiculous. Barely anything happens between the monotony of Garion asking questions and then being told "don't ask." Even the books two most powerful sorcerers, Belgarath and Polgara are more or less useless and barely even use their magic. What else are they there for? A bad story and paper thin characters really made this book one of the most boring I've ever read. I curse everyone who ever praised Eddings while criticizing some other arthor for some supposed shortcoming in their writing.
 
Are you sure we read the same book Moggle ?

Belgarath and Polgara are protecting Garion until he's old enough to deal with his destiny.

Belgarath's potted history at the end of book one gives Garion a framework which is gradually built upon as the story develops, how Garion's ultimate grandmother was Beldaran, Polgara's sister, how Garion's powers gradually develop and his own mind fills in some of the gaps.

Ok, he doesn't know he's the Rivan King until he picks up the sword and it's only later he finds out he has to face Torak, but the clues are scattered throughout the books, as things are explained both to Garion and the reader.
 
I read the Belgariad and did not find it awful. It does start out slowly, but the patient reader will be rewarded with at fairly good tale. No, it is not the best series I have ever read--but far from worst either.

Of course, Eddings may not be the a writer certain people like, but based on the number of people who have read it and reported, it seems the consesus of opinion is the story is an above average experience.
 
Hell, it's one of MY favorite stories-if one can get past Queen of Sorcery. That one was a bit of a yawn.-----But in all seriousness, I firmly believe those who have said they haven't been able to get through it should just keep at it with another attempt. You won't be disappointed.
 
Are you sure we read the same book Moggle ?

Belgarath and Polgara are protecting Garion until he's old enough to deal with his destiny.

Belgarath's potted history at the end of book one gives Garion a framework which is gradually built upon as the story develops, how Garion's ultimate grandmother was Beldaran, Polgara's sister, how Garion's powers gradually develop and his own mind fills in some of the gaps.

Ok, he doesn't know he's the Rivan King until he picks up the sword and it's only later he finds out he has to face Torak, but the clues are scattered throughout the books, as things are explained both to Garion and the reader.

I don't see the relevance of pointing out plot points from later books. This discussion is on book one!

I read the Belgariad and did not find it awful. It does start out slowly, but the patient reader will be rewarded with at fairly good tale. No, it is not the best series I have ever read--but far from worst either.

Of course, Eddings may not be the a writer certain people like, but based on the number of people who have read it and reported, it seems the consesus of opinion is the story is an above average experience.

What is the point of patience when there is barely any progression of the plot from beginning to end? There isn't even a climax to the story by the time you finish so whether you're patient or not there's certainly no reward at the end. It's like reading only 350 pages of a 1000 page book.

Hell, it's one of MY favorite stories-if one can get past Queen of Sorcery. That one was a bit of a yawn.-----But in all seriousness, I firmly believe those who have said they haven't been able to get through it should just keep at it with another attempt. You won't be disappointed.

If the first two books are both a big yawn how can a reader be expected to read the third book?
 
I am not surprised. I recently finished Belgariad and it was awful. The basic plot of the first book lets us view the world thru the eyes of a 15 year old boy protaganist ("Garion") with a hidden past. We're given a few hints but never find out any thing of real consequence about that past throughout the entire book. He's curious so he's constantly asking friends and his guardians about his past, his guardians, etc., etc. and why they're on this journey and then consistently being told not to ask questions. Consequently the reader doesn't end up knowing much more than he does because we're living vicariously thru him. I have never read a book like this. It's absolutely ridiculous. Barely anything happens between the monotony of Garion asking questions and then being told "don't ask." Even the books two most powerful sorcerers, Belgarath and Polgara are more or less useless and barely even use their magic. What else are they there for? A bad story and paper thin characters really made this book one of the most boring I've ever read. I curse everyone who ever praised Eddings while criticizing some other arthor for some supposed shortcoming in their writing.

There's a reason the title of the book was Pawn of Prophecy. the pawns never know what the chess player is doing. this first book built up character development. We now know who Garion, Durnik, Polgara, Belgarath, Barak Silk, and even Asharak the Murgo are. Yes you are seeing the majority of the story through a "kid's" eyes. Obviously you have gotten used to the D & D lifestyle. mages need to say their spells, and cast offensive spells across the board. basically your own little personal fourth of july celebration in a robe. that isn't Eddings. if you want that kind of stuff pick up TSR books, or Rosenberg's guardians of the flames. these books were written for the young at heart. no ultra complex plot devices, the story goes from point M through to point Z, a-L were taken care of before the book was written. Personally I found the diversity of character much more enjoyable than the simple, LoTR style story, band gets together to go take care of business, and here's the trouble they got in along the way. I note you did not mention the issues that occurred at Val Alorn with the boar, the bear, and the Earl of Jarvik. these were items that were meant to be the Climax of the book, and lead up to the second installment.
 
Last edited:
There's a reason the title of the book was Pawn of Prophecy. the pawns never know what the chess player is doing. this first book built up character development. We now know who Garion, Durnik, Polgara, Belgarath, Barak Silk, and even Asharak the Murgo are. Yes you are seeing the majority of the story through a "kid's" eyes. Obviously you have gotten used to the D & D lifestyle. mages need to say their spells, and cast offensive spells across the board. basically your own little personal fourth of july celebration in a robe. that isn't Eddings. if you want that kind of stuff pick up TSR books, or Rosenberg's guardians of the flames. these books were written for the young at heart. no ultra complex plot devices, the story goes from point M through to point Z, a-L were taken care of before the book was written. Personally I found the diversity of character much more enjoyable than the simple, LoTR style story, band gets together to go take care of business, and here's the trouble they got in along the way. I note you did not mention the issues that occurred at Val Alorn with the boar, the bear, and the Earl of Jarvik. these were items that were meant to be the Climax of the book, and lead up to the second installment.

If those events are supposed to be climaxes for the book then that only proves my point regarding how boring the book was. Even those who went as far as reading book 2 say Edding's books are a snoozefest.
 
Back
Top