Having only read the first two volumes, I'm uneasy at the idea that Cersei and Jaime have their own Point of View scenes in future writings.
The reason being that it almost suggests GRRM is losing touch with his original vision of the story, and letting it distract and wander for its own sake.
If Jaime and Cersei were such important characters that they deserved their own POV, then why not deliver them in the first two volumes?
The argument that the first two volumes were too long doesn't seem to work - you can cut out most of Arya and Catelyn without affecting the story.
The whole thing just sets off warning bells that GRRM may be spending too much exploring the periphery of his story - and end up do a Jordan, with 10 books going nowhere.
OR have I missed something important, and that A Song of Fire and Ice should never have required constant Point of View usage in the first place, and that character POVs can change with ease and fluidity without compromising the story?
A discussion pointer.
The reason being that it almost suggests GRRM is losing touch with his original vision of the story, and letting it distract and wander for its own sake.
If Jaime and Cersei were such important characters that they deserved their own POV, then why not deliver them in the first two volumes?
The argument that the first two volumes were too long doesn't seem to work - you can cut out most of Arya and Catelyn without affecting the story.
The whole thing just sets off warning bells that GRRM may be spending too much exploring the periphery of his story - and end up do a Jordan, with 10 books going nowhere.
OR have I missed something important, and that A Song of Fire and Ice should never have required constant Point of View usage in the first place, and that character POVs can change with ease and fluidity without compromising the story?
A discussion pointer.