The Alamo Avenger
will work for donuts....
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2007
- Messages
- 32
Ok, I would like some advice on my query letter. I had been going under the premise of keeping it short and simple and let the writing speak for itself, like this:
But then I found this:
http://w2.eff.org//Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/paradigms_workshop_sterling.lexicon
which got me thinking that maybe in the second query letter I'm using just enough rope to hang myself with. It's not that I think my novel has any of the faults mentioned on that site (a couple of them did apply in early drafts of my MS) but I don't want to give the agent the feeling that those things COULD be in my novel.
Is the first one better, the second, or something in between? Any feedback would be welcome as I tend to way overthink these things.
However, a recent rejection letter I received said she wasn't enthusiastic with the premise of my story. It got me thinking that maybe I need a better 'hook', so I thought I would offer a little more insight into my novel by beefing up the query letter a little and making it a little more personal. So I extended it to this:Dear ______;
The year is 2056. Mankind has extended their reach to the edge of the solar system. A frozen alien life form is discovered in the Kuiper Belt region. Archaeologist Harlow Cavalear is studying the artefact when the asteroid he is on is struck by an alien craft. The ship swallows him up and whisks him out of the solar system. Elsewhere, a strange nebula-dwelling race called the Delanii are freed from their dying system. They enslave a technologically depressed but telepathic race called the Halfac. As the Delanii begin spreading through the universe it is discovered that they are after a mysterious substance known as chitin. Even though no one knows what it is or exactly what it does, they all must decide what part in the war they will play, including Harlow himself....
I chose to submit my novel, UNIVERSE OCEAN, for consideration after reading about your agency in the Novel and Short Story Writer’s Market. The manuscript, which is approximately 250,000 words long, could be classified under the Space Opera genre. Even though I am writing science fiction, I feel a sense of mystery is the most important tone in any piece of literature. The act of exploring the unknown and bringing the reader along that journey with me is why I write.
The first six pages of the manuscript along with a one page synopsis immediately follow this letter. Please notify me if you are interested in reviewing my complete text for publishing consideration. Thank you for taking the time to consider representing my work.
Dear _________;
The year is 2056. Mankind has extended their reach to the edge of the solar system. A frozen alien life form is discovered in the Kuiper Belt region. Archaeologist Harlow Cavalear is studying the artefact when the asteroid he is on is struck by an alien craft. The ship swallows him up and whisks him out of the solar system. Elsewhere, a strange nebula-dwelling race called the Delanii are freed from their dying system. They enslave a technologically depressed but telepathic race called the Halfac. As the Delanii begin spreading through the universe it is discovered that they are after a mysterious substance known as chitin. Even though no one knows what it is or exactly what it does, they all must decide what part in the war they will play, including Harlow himself....
I chose to submit my novel, Universe Ocean, for consideration after reading about your agency in the Novel and Short Story Writer’s Market. The manuscript, which is approximately 250,000 words long, could be classified under the Space Opera genre. If asked to describe the novel in general terms, I would liken Universe Ocean to a mandala (a cosmic diagram that reminds us of our relation to the infinite, the world that extends both beyond and within our bodies and minds). Some authors write very linear plots; these do not appeal to me. Although I do not think the novel is too esoteric for the average reader, I will say that it is complex enough to keep the attention of those whose intelligence skews to the ADHD side of the population. While the book at its core is not exactly a love story, it is a story about love. All books are about something. My book is about Nothing…….or rather, it intimately details the war between Something and Nothing.
Many of the technological devices in Universe Ocean have names that are not just made up—they are often Latin or Old English phrases. If one takes the time to look up these words, they serve as a sort of Rosetta stone, giving the novel an additional layer of depth and meaning. While elements of hard science exist in the manuscript, I have a strong background in mythology and as a result the story tends to lean heavily on psycho-spiritual building blocks. While attending high school (many, many years ago) I completed a through-the-mail course at the Institute of Children’s Literature. I have been writing for as long as I can remember and am always searching for constructive criticism in order to sharpen my skills as a writer.
The first six pages of the manuscript along with a one page synopsis immediately follow this letter. Please notify me if you are interested in reviewing my complete text for publishing consideration. Thank you for taking the time to consider representing my work.
But then I found this:
http://w2.eff.org//Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/paradigms_workshop_sterling.lexicon
which got me thinking that maybe in the second query letter I'm using just enough rope to hang myself with. It's not that I think my novel has any of the faults mentioned on that site (a couple of them did apply in early drafts of my MS) but I don't want to give the agent the feeling that those things COULD be in my novel.
Is the first one better, the second, or something in between? Any feedback would be welcome as I tend to way overthink these things.