thesoothsayer
Wyrm of Books
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Messages
- 228
I've read that publishers prefer first prints to be in hardcover or trade paperback format because fewer copies need to be sold to make a profit. My question is how are formats for the next print decided? Do writers have any say or is it solely decided by the publishers?
For example, I did a search on Guy Gavriel Kay's books and they all seem to be in trade paperback format, even though they've been in print for years. How come they've never migrated to mass market paperback format? Is it a strategy decided by publishers to milk as much profit as they can?
Is this a little short-sighted because the higher prices may exclude potential readers in lower income countries, who may contribute to higher sales of mass market paperbacks? Or are the profit margins from hardcovers/trade paperbacks so much more that it's actually better to sell less books in those formats?
I guess that publishers have a rough idea of how much each author can sell based on their popularity and decide what format to put their books in but I'm hoping that someone with experience can tell me for sure.
For example, I did a search on Guy Gavriel Kay's books and they all seem to be in trade paperback format, even though they've been in print for years. How come they've never migrated to mass market paperback format? Is it a strategy decided by publishers to milk as much profit as they can?
Is this a little short-sighted because the higher prices may exclude potential readers in lower income countries, who may contribute to higher sales of mass market paperbacks? Or are the profit margins from hardcovers/trade paperbacks so much more that it's actually better to sell less books in those formats?
I guess that publishers have a rough idea of how much each author can sell based on their popularity and decide what format to put their books in but I'm hoping that someone with experience can tell me for sure.