Considering we live in a socio-economic climate that requires constant growth or else the wheels fall off of it (see the previous year's worth of news for an example), I was interested by the
coverage given to our dwindling oil stocks in the Independent...and all the comments.
Pretty much every comment fell under one of five basic categories:
1) It's a socialist conspiracy
2) It's a capitalist conspiracy
3) The world is warming and this is natural
4) The world is cooling and this is natural
5) - and my personal favourite - what God has made man cannot destroy, ergo we have infinite resources forever. Amen.
Irregardless of the seemingly universal desire to stick our fingers in our ears and wish the bad things away, assessing the risk surely points to the implementation of some sort of threat minimisation before actual problems (and by this I mean the knock on effect of a
serious oil shortage) occur. It's all well and good to point out that these things cost money but the eventual effect of them with zero protection in place against that eventuality is too great to risk.
As an example, cruise liners would be cheaper, lighter, have more space and use less fuel without lifeboats. The risk of a liner sinking is very very low, and yet we willingly take the precaution of fitting them with safety measures to offset the chance of it occurring.