Top 15 Horror Authors

Fried Egg

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
3,544
I saw this article on goodreads in which a list is compiled of the 20 greatest horror authors.

Here's the run down (although see the link for more detail):

1. Edgar Allan Poe
2. H.P. Lovecraft
3. Stephen King
4. Algernon Blackwood
5. Arthur Machen
6. Ambrose Bierce
7. M.R. James
8. Shirley Jackson
9. Ray Bradbury
10. Richard Matheson
11. Guy De Maupassant
12. Robert Aickman
13. Ramsey Campbell
14. Thomas Ligotti
15. Clive Barker

Any thoughts on this? Glaring ommissions or some too highly placed?
 
Its looks like typical Goodreads list a popularity contest.

I agree with Poe but King at nr.3 is too much. Matheson,Brabbury should be alittle higher up imo of course.

Looks like he forgot Le Fanu,William Hope Hodgson.....
 
Oliver Onions, Charles Beaumont, John Buchan, A. M. Burrage, H. R. Wakefield, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, Robert Bloch, Thomas Tryon....

As with some of those I list above, I'm not sure that Jackson or Maupassant quite belong there; horror was by no means the major portion of their writing (though they did write some of the great classics of the field)... the same can be said for Bradbury. I'd not put Barker in quite that class... he has turned out too much which I would consider mediocre for such a placement, I think. (Of course, he has also written some very fine work, as well.) And if it is meant to convey those which are the most influential... well, what about Bram Stoker, Mary Shelley, Ann Radcliffe, Sax Rohmer, and the like?

In general, it's a list of writers well worth looking into (though I have strong reservations about King), but hardly an accurate reflection of the "greatest" in the field either in terms of popularity, influence, or actual quality of their work; many of them are of the top notch, but some are not, while others who are are conspicuous by their absence....
 
Oliver Onions, Charles Beaumont, John Buchan, A. M. Burrage, H. R. Wakefield, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, Robert Bloch, Thomas Tryon....

As with some of those I list above, I'm not sure that Jackson or Maupassant quite belong there; horror was by no means the major portion of their writing (though they did write some of the great classics of the field)... the same can be said for Bradbury. I'd not put Barker in quite that class... he has turned out too much which I would consider mediocre for such a placement, I think. (Of course, he has also written some very fine work, as well.) And if it is meant to convey those which are the most influential... well, what about Bram Stoker, Mary Shelley, Ann Radcliffe, Sax Rohmer, and the like?

In general, it's a list of writers well worth looking into (though I have strong reservations about King), but hardly an accurate reflection of the "greatest" in the field either in terms of popularity, influence, or actual quality of their work; many of them are of the top notch, but some are not, while others who are are conspicuous by their absence....

Influence isnt important apparently, i agree with you about King,Barker. Contemporary popularity doesnt mean you will be seen or remembered as a great horror writer.

I dont see though why you would not include Jackson,Maupassant if they wrote classics of the genre. Its about quality and not quantity. Stoker,Shelley isnt remembered for 3,4 books.

I would be more interested in seeing regular horror readers in this forum make a list of their own of authors they think are great,influential,the best ones today.
 
From my position of relative ignorance, I think it is quite a good list although I would drop King right out of it and bump Ligotti up near the top.
 
Influence isnt important apparently, i agree with you about King,Barker. Contemporary popularity doesnt mean you will be seen or remembered as a great horror writer.

I dont see though why you would not include Jackson,Maupassant if they wrote classics of the genre. Its about quality and not quantity. Stoker,Shelley isnt remembered for 3,4 books.

I would be more interested in seeing regular horror readers in this forum make a list of their own of authors they think are great,influential,the best ones today.

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear: I wouldn't call them "horror writers", as this was far from the major focus of their work. They (like Poe and many others) were writers who occasionally wrote tales of horror, terror, or the weird (and occasionally thing which are frankly unclassifiable, such as Jackson's "One Ordinary Day, with Peanuts"). Important to the field, yes, but not "horror writers".

For example: Out of the 300+ short stories Maupassant wrote, less than 10 are true "horror" tales in the sense most people would mean; a fair number (about 40 or so) are more depictions of human perversity and cruelty; but the majority are "realistic" depictions of life and human interaction (albeit often of a rather extreme or unpleasant sort -- though by no means always). With Jackson, she only wrote one true supernatural novel (and even that is debatable): The Haunting of Hill House; all her other novels are non-supernatural, though more than one are closely related. And only a relatively small handful of her stories fit the category, as well. To me, a "horror writer" is one who concentrates either exclusively or largely on horror, or at least is best known for that by their contemporaries -- and this certainly doesn't fit Jackson or Maupassant. I suppose it is something like Ellison and others objecting to being called "sci-fi writers" when that is only a tiny portion of what they write. So I'd have trouble using that label for at least a few of those on the list. (Of course, Monty James would be rather appalled to hear himself called such, for that matter....)

From my position of relative ignorance, I think it is quite a good list although I would drop King right out of it and bump Ligotti up near the top.

It isn't that it's a bad list per se, but I do think it is almost entirely subjective, and based on a rather narrow view of the field. As for King... well, he is an important figure in the field in several ways: He is certainly the best selling and most popular writer to emerge from the field; he has had more than a little influence on other writers as well as on bringing the horror field into general (semi-)acceptance; and at his best (which is less often than it should be) he can actually be quite a good writer, as well. I'm not sure I'd put him in with the true "greats" in the field, but he certainly has his place, nonetheless....

As for Ligotti... I'm inclined to agree with you, but the company he keeps at that stage of ranking (Aickman and Campbell, for instance) is still damn' good; two of the best the field has produced....
 
Agreed it's a reasonably good list F.E. but as J.D. has pointed out not exactly comprehensive in terms of a "best of all time" list. Still, as a starting point, you could do worse than read the works of these authors. In terms of popular or well known "best of" names of the Genre I was particularly surprised not to see Hawthorne's and to a lesser extent Bloch's names in that list and not having Stoker or Shelley listed seems a little strange to me.

I agree with Ligotti, he must surely be one of the best ever. Probably my 3 best or perhaps favourtie (as this is a very subjective process) of all time are still Ligotti, Poe and Lovecraft but there's a lot of other very fine writers out there of course as Mr. Worthington has already pointed out.
 
Didnt Ellison write SF short stories ? Or did he write only urban fantasy alà Bradbury ?

There were authors that were ashamed for some reasons of their genre but that dont mean they will not be remembered for being a great of that genre.

Jackson for example i have seen in many all-time best horror collections with Poe,HPL,Blackwood etc That means her little work in the field made a difference. People talk about her famous novel like she wrote many horror works.

Like Poe he wrote much more than horror but he is still remembered as an all time great.
 
Well, with Poe, in part this is because he defined the short story in its modern form, as well as refining the entire concept of the weird or horror tale. Following Poe, no one could write the sort of thing which had been accepted beforehand, without being held up to a fair amount of harsh criticism. As Lovecraft himself (who, recall, once called Poe his "God of Fiction") noted in Supernatural Horror in Literature:

True, his type of outlook may have been anticipated; but it was he who first realized its possibilities and gave it supreme form and systematic expression. True also, that subsequent writers may have produced greater single tales than his; but again we must comprehend that it was only he who taught them by example and precept the art which they, having the way cleared for them and given an explicit guide, were perhaps able to carry to greater lengths.

Even Poe (as with all pioneers) has been surpassed, in various ways, when it comes to individual stories... but not, I think, in his impact on the field. (Ironically, his greatest challenger in this regard is also one who was perhaps his greatest supporter: the same gentleman from Providence -- a state of affairs which would leave the Old Gent thoroughly flabbergasted.)

Ellison did write some sf short tales (and even a short novel, The Man With Nine Lives/The South of a Scythe), but the bulk of his fantastic fiction was fantasy or outright allegory. And, truth be told, his "straight" sf (if one can call any of Ellison's tales "straight" anything) is often among his weakest work.

And with at least a fair number of those who shy away from such labels... it isn't being ashamed, but fighting being pigeonholed, and therefore tying them down to one particular branch of literature, when they have fine abilities in many; the fall-out of the modern insistence on genrefication....

And true, Ms. Jackson's fine novel and her strange stories are among the gems of the field, and are better known to the average reader, perhaps; but that still does not make her a "horror writer", any more than Browning's magnificent weird poem, "Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came" makes him a "horror poet"....

Some years ago, I was having a discussion with someone about Clark Ashton Smith. They were asking what kind of writer he was, and while I was trying to answer that, someone else popped in and said: "Oh, he's a horror writer". That was that. The door closed on the person's interest with that phrase, and it's a pity, because this is someone who, had they been introduced to Smith's wide variety of works, would almost certainly have been very enthusiastic about them.....
 
Yeah Poe isnt a good example he was a pioneer in several genres. What i meant to say is you can be a writer of different types of story or genres and still be mostly remembered for one genre because that happens to have your most classic work.

I dont mean to label writers for one genre i mean there are many that are known for 2,3 genres. In this list Bradbury,Matheson and co. Heck i use to think Matheson was mostly SF writer because I Am Legend and then i see he has written much more horror,even fantasy,westerns. Pigeonholing has never seemed an issue to me because i'm used to reading authors that wrote many kinds of stories in their career.

With Jackson i meant she might not be a horror writer if you look at her career works but she will forever be known as a classic horror writer for her famous story. Take me as an example i have no clue if she wrote romance novels or regular non-genre normally. I know her famous novel after hearing so much about it,being listed so much,the movie.
 
What's this then about Robert Aickman? I'd never heard of him before but from his description in the article and J.D.'s praise, I am very curious...

Anyone care to recommed anything by this author?
 
From what I know , I recommend getting a loan before going out to buy anything by him. A very large loan .
 
From what I know , I recommend getting a loan before going out to buy anything by him. A very large loan .
I see what you mean; there's not exactly a large amount readilly available by him, is there? :rolleyes:
 
On Stan (the Man) Lee... yes, and even well within the superhero days, Marvel had quite a few such titles. A fair amount of these, however, were either adaptations or riffs on work done by straight literary writers in the field, however, so I'm not sure they quite apply....

I see what you mean; there's not exactly a large amount readilly available by him, is there? :rolleyes:

On Aickman... well, you can now and again find copies of his earlier collections for quite reasonable (even cheap) prices, especially Cold Hand in Mine and Painted Devils (both of which I would highly recommend)... in part because they were also released through book club editions and paperback....
 
dask must be joking ;)

Speaking about riffs and Stan Lee the guy that publish Planet Stories Mona in pazio site said he read a Henry Kuttner novel about a group of people with superpowers that sounded exactly like the original X-men Angel,Iceman,a cyclop, a leader with mental powers....

If that is true talk about stealing an idea...
 

Similar threads


Back
Top