Can you 'start' from the book two in a trilogy?

He importantly split the book in sizable chunks to understand what he needed to raise, but the important thing is that the reader has to go through back again in the time-line wise. Meaning that the storyline didn't happen in the 'real-time' element.
Strictly speaking, I don't think this is what happens in LOTR. Yes, some of the books in LOTR run in parallel (as regards calendar time), but the stories in these sections are told in time-order (give or take the retelling of otherwise unseen events by one character to another).

As for my own WIPs, I did start with Book 2, although I didn't know it at the time. Like Wagner (who realised that Siegfrieds Tod - now Götterdamerung - needed something to help the opera-goer make sense of it, and so wrote, eventually, three prequels), I decided an introductory volume was required, even before I finished the original book**. That's sometimes how it is.

If a work is a trilogy (or whatever), a slicing up of one big story, tell it in the best order for the reader to understand (at the approriate time) what is going on. A series is different: you can add whatever you like. But as someone has already said, be careful about spoilers that ruin any intended suspense in a book that could be read later.



** - Needless to say, what is now Book 2 bears little ressemblance to that earliest version.
 
Strictly speaking, I don't think this is what happens in LOTR. Yes, some of the books in LOTR run in parallel (as regards calendar time), but the stories in these sections are told in time-order (give or take the retelling of otherwise unseen events by one character to another).

He doesn't take out the bits that had happened, but JRR goes back in time to show the readers the events that has happened elsewhere. If he would had done it parallel, meaning real-time we wouldn't see some of the things that happened but we would instead hear them speaking about them.
 
I think you may be confusing calendars and timelines. Yes, the different books are revisiting certain calendar dates, but because the books are generally autonomous**, with different sets of characters in wholly different locations - the reader does not really revisit timelines.








** - The interwoven events at Emyn Muil being an obvious (though not really time-bending) exception.
 
It depends on the flow of your story, I've read some books which include the main plot points of book 1 in the sequels but then again I read Harry Potter in order but my brother started with book 2 and finished with book 1, personally I have to start from book 1 because that's the introduction.
 

Back
Top