Ursa, I agree. The ambiguity of Mr. Goodman's review is bothersome.
The quote that grabbed my attention was...
A great series should challenge viewers to pay attention, to connect dots and anticipate connections. Thrones manages a superior complexity without ever making you think that you’ve lost the connection to the story. It’s paced with precision and the carefully crafted assemblage of characters unspools at such a rate that you can keep up while keeping tabs on their ever changing moods.
And a thought struck me... We won't get any "one off" or "filler" episodes with AGOT.
I highly enjoyed
LOST (except for the last ten minutes). I admit I liked
Veronica Mars. I really liked
The Sopranos. I enjoyed
ROME. Last year's guilty pleasure was
Spartacus: Blood and Sand, while this year's was
True Blood. I also found
Battlestar Galactica to be fun. But the one thing that often frustrates me with all these shows are the stand alone episodes. You know the episodes that take place right in the middle of the season long (or series long) story that only focus on one character and don't relate in any way to the main story. These episodes end up being a self contained story.
Legend of the Seeker, an adaptation of a fantasy series seems to fall victim to this malady on a fairly regular basis. I might as well have been watching any 70's or 80's action hospital, cop dramedy like
Knight Rider,
Emergency,
CHiPs, or
Air Wolf. Because of the plethora of chracters... actually plethora is too small... because of the horde of characters, the structured narrative, and constraining timeline, AGOT should avoid the stand alone, "one off" and "filler" episodes.
Movies don't usually have a ten minute mini story in the middle that does not really relate to the rest of the plot. Well,
The Two Towers did it with Aragorn's cliff falling and vizions...
must resist the demon...
I want my shows to flow much more like a novel and less like a comic strip.