IlliferThePenniless
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Messages
- 285
I was a bit surprised to find that just about everyone in the ADwD discussion thread above seems to be buying Aegon as a Targ, while I find that I'm much more skeptical. So I'm just going to toss a few things out there and see what everyone thinks...
This is where my skepticism started. Most of Quaithe's prophecy is fairly self evident. Victarion, Red Priest, Tyrion, Connington, and Quentyn are all pretty self evident. Mummer's Dragon seems similarly self evident. A fake dragon. Upon consideration, I suppose it could mean "dragon belonging to a mummer (ie Varys)"
except
In the House of the Undying we've got Dany called "the slayer of lies" followed pretty closely by a fake dragon being cheered on by the crowds, which is, at the very least, suggestive.
In ADwD we're also introduced to the idea that Dragon's have affinity for those with dragon blood in them (or at least we have the idea confirmed a bit, Brown Ben Plumm had mentioned it before). That's got to be in there for a reason and if I had to bet I'd say that confirming Aegon's lineage would be the most likely reason there (Boaz, I'll leave it to you to make the argument that this will be mechanism by which we discover Tywin's dark secret)
There's also the meta issue that it just seems like a very strange decision for Martin to introduce the rightful claimant to throne with the series 70% done. On a gut level I just don't buy it.
So why am I the only one thinking this way?
Hear me, Daenerys Targaryen. The glass candles are burning.
Soon comes the pale mare, and after her the others. Kraken and dark flame, lion and griffin, the sun’s son and the mummer’s dragon. Trust none of them. Remember the Undying. Beware the perfumed seneschal
This is where my skepticism started. Most of Quaithe's prophecy is fairly self evident. Victarion, Red Priest, Tyrion, Connington, and Quentyn are all pretty self evident. Mummer's Dragon seems similarly self evident. A fake dragon. Upon consideration, I suppose it could mean "dragon belonging to a mummer (ie Varys)"
except
. . . mother of dragons . . . child of three . . .
. . . mother of dragons . . . child of storm . . .
. . . mother of dragons . . . daughter of death . . .
. . . mother of dragons, slayer of lies . . .
. . . mother of dragons, bride of fire . . .
A cloth dragon swayed on poles amidst a cheering crowd.
In the House of the Undying we've got Dany called "the slayer of lies" followed pretty closely by a fake dragon being cheered on by the crowds, which is, at the very least, suggestive.
In ADwD we're also introduced to the idea that Dragon's have affinity for those with dragon blood in them (or at least we have the idea confirmed a bit, Brown Ben Plumm had mentioned it before). That's got to be in there for a reason and if I had to bet I'd say that confirming Aegon's lineage would be the most likely reason there (Boaz, I'll leave it to you to make the argument that this will be mechanism by which we discover Tywin's dark secret)
There's also the meta issue that it just seems like a very strange decision for Martin to introduce the rightful claimant to throne with the series 70% done. On a gut level I just don't buy it.
So why am I the only one thinking this way?