(I wasn't certain if this was the right section for this, but it didn't seem to fit in publishing either.)
We all know (even those of us who've never done anything about it) that we need a website to help promote our work, but are there many sites shared by two or more aspiring authors? I can see the following pros and cons:
Pros:
1. Shared costs of website design
2 (probably most important). Someone following a link to any author means a visitor for the site as a whole. This visitor might well check out the site's other authors, possibly writers they wouldn't otherwise have heard of
3. The greater the amount and variety of site content, the more it might crop up in searches(?)
4. Much more regular blog updates if several writers are sharing a blog, and more comments generated if they comment on each other's posts
5. The group itself might acquire an identity and a reputation
Cons:
1. Danger of web-design-by-committee
2. Struggles for prominence if one author takes off (though if each had their own section, not sure this is really a concern).
3. Working out membership, both initially and ongoing
Any others? Does anyone know if it works in practice? If the Inklings were around today, before any of them became successful, would they each have their own website or a shared one?
We all know (even those of us who've never done anything about it) that we need a website to help promote our work, but are there many sites shared by two or more aspiring authors? I can see the following pros and cons:
Pros:
1. Shared costs of website design
2 (probably most important). Someone following a link to any author means a visitor for the site as a whole. This visitor might well check out the site's other authors, possibly writers they wouldn't otherwise have heard of
3. The greater the amount and variety of site content, the more it might crop up in searches(?)
4. Much more regular blog updates if several writers are sharing a blog, and more comments generated if they comment on each other's posts
5. The group itself might acquire an identity and a reputation
Cons:
1. Danger of web-design-by-committee
2. Struggles for prominence if one author takes off (though if each had their own section, not sure this is really a concern).
3. Working out membership, both initially and ongoing
Any others? Does anyone know if it works in practice? If the Inklings were around today, before any of them became successful, would they each have their own website or a shared one?