Relativity calculator for interstellar journeys

You know... I might be getting a little greedy here, but I'm going on a don't ask, don't get ethos. Have you ever considered factoring in energy requirements and specific fuel consumption calculations? (I'm presuming wildly in not talking jibber jabber to you based on the fact you wrote the program!) and then extrapolating for potential future 'space drives'. I'm sure some reasonably legitimate projected figures can be found for the SFC of things like fusion/antimatter etc etc. That way for those who are quite interested in ensuring their SF ships are kept plausible they can actually have some basis for sizing them (fuel tanks/engines and so on).

As I say. It's awesome what you've done so far and makes a mockery of my scribbled note pad of calcs. :)
Apologies, Ralph, I completely missed your post :oops:. I've not gone into adding that stuff as there are good tools out there that do it. I played around a bit in the atomic rockets pages: http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/index.php but I don't realistically have the time to add that kind of thing in. However if you are travelling around at those sort of speeds for long distances then you should certainly consider the impact of time dilation as the traveller perceived values are the figures you should be using to calculate such things.
 
No worries. As I say: greed :)

Fortunately, other than my finale, time dilation, for the most part isn't a problem for me. They're getting nowhere near those speeds. However I'm just drafting that all important final part where it DOES become an issue (very high velocity chase scene, with a bit of a black holey twist to it). It would be great if you could beta it as I would suggest we may well be singing from the same hymn sheet in 'what's our thang' is. eg a bit of legitimacy in our tastes.
 
No worries. As I say: greed :)

Fortunately, other than my finale, time dilation, for the most part isn't a problem for me. They're getting nowhere near those speeds. However I'm just drafting that all important final part where it DOES become an issue (very high velocity chase scene, with a bit of a black holey twist to it). It would be great if you could beta it as I would suggest we may well be singing from the same hymn sheet in 'what's our thang' is. eg a bit of legitimacy in our tastes.
That's me to a 't'. It doesn't have to be totally hard but I do like my SF hard! Have you ever read Poul Anderson's Tau Zero; very much about time dilation and one of the best hard SF books from the early classic SF authors; stands right up there with anything by Clarke or Niven or Asimov. Very happy to act as a beta.

It's interesting how I am on the hardness of SF. I can accept a major piece of fantasy like hyperspace or warp drives etc. but baulk other often minor little pieces of unbelievability. I guess I have to accept those big ones to make all those space operas I so love possible! :)
 
Yeah I have read that one, a good book.

Same here, though the Stephen Baxter/Al Reynolds style is very much my preference to hyperspace etc. Pushing Ice, as much as the melodrama in it is a bit eye rolling, is probably my ideal combination of high tech and plausible.
 
I quite like the hard SF aspects of Ken MacLeod's Engines of Light series. In them they have a light speed engine that has you literally travelling at the speed of light. Now that bit is obviously fantasy but what I like is then he extrapolates correctly from that. The drive takes you at light speed so at the speed of light (tau zero) any length of journey will appear instantaneous to the travellers, it doesn't matter whether it is ten light years or a thousand. However if it is say one hundred light years then that's how much time will have passed for the rest of the galaxy whilst you make your 'instantaneous' journey. He plays on this quite a lot in the books. Sadly whilst I find his writing quite good it doesn't somehow quite live up to his ideas which is a shame.

I've read an enjoyed quite a bit of Reynolds but so far I've only read the first of Baxter's Xeelee books. I really must read some more.
 
Yes, I read five of his books (all 3 MacLeod's Engines of Light series). Some good ideas, plots, characters, but I find them too flawed. I won't be getting/buying more (3 were borrowed). He's over enamoured with archaic socialism and nano-tech. Also I'm not much interest in reading descriptions of the more intimate nature.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top