The Others and Religion [SPOILERS THROUGH ADWD]

Meddler

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6
Hey everyone, new here, haven't posted a lot on ASoIaF since I'm just finishing ADWD but I had a few things I'd like to share.

I would like to present a theory on the origins and motivations of the Others. However, it goes somewhat hand in hand with a theory on some of the religions of the Ice and Fire story as well, so first I would like to put forth that theory first: simply put, the gods as they are literally described simply may not exist. Magic certainly exists, but the particular religions seem more rooted in cultural evolution than the existence of deities. There really isn't any convincing evidence that any of the espoused deities exist--from R'hllor to the Great Other, the Drowned God to the Seven, or the God of Many Faces to the Great Shepherd. Excluding R'hllor/the Great Other and the Old Gods we see a direct cultural relationship involved with each religion. The Drowned God presides over a violent, island dwelling, seafaring people. The God of Many Faces over a cultural melting pot formed as a colony many other cultures fleeing Valyrian expansion (and also a religion with access to magic, just to show that magic isn't limited to the more "mysterious" religions). The Seven over a feudal and technologically advanced culture that reigns over, oddly enough, seven kingdoms (yes, I know, the Seven came with the Andal invasion, but its still a convenient fit and who knows how the religion may have evolved post Westerosi-Andal expansion). The Great Shepherd over peaceful farmers and shepherds with a large population of lambs and sheep. We know the Rhoynar worshiped river-Gods before adopting the Seven as well, which makes sense as their culture originated on one of the world's greatest rivers.

The Old Gods are unique in that the religion isn't in fact deistic. The Old Gods aren't unique, individual entities; but almost a term for pantheistic spirituality. And regardless, this was the religion of the Children of the Forest, and thus we are far removed from access to its potential cultural origins.

Now, none of this is to say there may not be forces guiding these religious movements, be they natural or supernatural or magic, just that the Gods themselves as they are represented by men seem more likely to be ideological personifications than tangible deities. We frequently hear members of every religion prominent in the stories complain about how the Gods don't seem to really play a role in any of the events and question their motives or even doubt their existence.

Now for the Others--R'hllor and the Great Other, so far as we can tell, originate in Asshai, the highly mysterious land in the far east we know very little about directly. I suspect that perhaps the Others actually originated in the Shadow beyond Asshai. They only appear at night and in the cold, and though we have no real indication of the temperature of the Shadow, its somewhat intuitive that a land covered in darkness would be naturally cold. At some point before men had spread throughout the world, or perhaps before they even existed, there was a very long winter (henceforth referred to as a "superwinter"), and the Others were able to migrate west. They crossed the Arm of Dorne and into Westeros. Eventually, however, the seasons turned again, and the Others in Westeros were too far from the Shadow to return home, and instead fled to the coldest region of Westeros--the North. Centuries past before the next superwinter and their next opportunity to leave Westeros, and by the time it finally came, Westeros was inhabited by the Children of the Forest and the First Men. What ensued was what historians refer to as the "Long Night," and as the Others were so alien to the CotF and First Men and their language so different, war became inevitable, specifically the "War for the Dawn". Eventually, the Others were thrown back into the North.

If this is the case, it is likely the people native to Asshai have also encountered the Others (assuming there are still some there), or did at one time. They wouldn't have had the Wall to protect them, or the changing of the seasons due to the proximity to the Shadow. Instead, presumably, they cultivated magic surrounding light and fire, which seeped its way into their culture and become the foundation for the religion of R'hllor. They may have even built a magical barrier similar to the Wall to protect themselves from the inhabitants of the Shadow. I would have to re-read to make sure, but I seem to remember an implication of volcanic activity in Asshai/the Shadow, and the implication that there may be dragons there. Perhaps whatever magic the Asshai'i used also had some part in the Doom of Valyria (another time though, perhaps).

Even further, the legend of Azor Ahai comes from the east, even though its always assumed (though, to my knowledge, never explicitly stated) to be about events that took place in Westeros. This always struck me as a bit odd, but what if Azor Ahai was Asshai'i and was involved in fighting the Others in the far east and never had anything to do with Westeros? The names "Azor Ahai" and "Nissa Nissa" certainly don't seem to be rooted in the Old Tongue of the First Men, which is where they would have been descended if they were indeed figures of the War for the Dawn, since the First Men were the only Men in Westeros at the time (unless, of course, they were CotF, whose language isn't distinguishable to men, and thus the names would have to be First Men interpretations anyway). More Likely, the war simply ended as the seasons changed and the Others hadn't progressed far enough to think about moving East and had to retreat North, and were then cut off with the construction of the Wall.

Even further, no one from Westeros has been able to cross the Sunset Sea (off the western coast of Westeros) and return. Perhaps this is because doing so would lead one into the Shadow lands and an encounter with its inhabitants--the Others, not to mention potentially harsh climates.

What got me thinking about a lot of this was the Bran and Melisandre chapters in ADWD. Melisandre has a vision at one point where she sees a figure with "A thousand eyes [and one]" and a boy with a "wolf's head," clearly referencing Bloodraven and Bran. She also seems fairly certain they are agents of "the Great Other." However, Bran and Bloodraven are aligned with the CotF (not to mention attacked by Wights, though Wights may simply attack any warm blooded creatures), who were against the Others during the War for the Dawn. So, maybe the CotF were forced north of the Wall following the Andal invasion. Perhaps over the centuries, they found a way to communicate with the weakened Others and have formed a truce, and now with another superwinter on the horizon, intend to try and help the Others return home peacefully, with help from Bran and his gifts. Thus, Melisandre may simply be misguided in accurately predicting Bran is aligned with the Others, but assuming his/their intent is malevolent. The Priesthood of R'hllor are slaves sold shortly after birth, so her perspective is stilted by religious zealotry she's had imprinted on her since she was a child. This is perhaps an incidental cost of her magical abilities as well.

Of course, a lot of this is making some pretty big leaps in assumption without a huge amount of evidence, but I can't find anything to contradict much of it. I have more to come in all likelihood, but this is about all I got in me at the moment. Anyone have any thoughts?
 
I could find a sense of possible theoretical agreement with your theory, right up until the point, you mentioned the children of the forest and the others as allies.
That seems unlikely, given that Bran's party (and Coldhands) was attacked by wights. And that the Children seem to be safeguarding their cave from the wights/others.
 
Nice theory!
KiwiBird - Would Bran have traveled so far to serve such evil forces as he's been told about since he was a child? Obviously he wouldn't (and he didn't, he did it under the assumption he's going to find the CotF)
Maybe it's all just a clever deception, designed to draw Bran there (for some reason we don't know about yet) - meaning that Coldhands was pretending to fight the others while he's actually just one of them. And i'd also like to point out that the wights outside the cave might in fact be guarding the cave.

I agree with your point about religion. We've seen no evidence to conclude that gods exist, other than in people's minds.
If you haven't read it yet, there's a discussion about the different religions in the forum.
 
Meddler- Welcome to the forum, and congratulations on an amazing first post. The only point I'd disagree with is that the Others are only seen at night, but that doesn't really affect your overall theory.

Having said that, I think it's unlikely that your entire theory holds up, although parts of it may. i look forward to seeing lots more posts from you :)
 
I could find a sense of possible theoretical agreement with your theory, right up until the point, you mentioned the children of the forest and the others as allies.
That seems unlikely, given that Bran's party (and Coldhands) was attacked by wights. And that the Children seem to be safeguarding their cave from the wights/others.

Yeah it definitely seems a bit thin there in a sense, I'll agree, but then we have to resolve this issue with Melisandre's vision of Bloodraven and Bran as agents of the "Great Other". Is she simply mistaken? Perhaps the "Great Other" has nothing to do with "The Others"? These two possibilities seem at least as unlikely to me. On the other hand, the CotF have been north of the wall, essentially trapped with the Others for centuries, have they simply been hiding from them the whole time? Their numbers were already greatly dwindled following the Andal invasion, and they freely admit they are too few in number to avoid extinction. It seems likely if their hostilities with the Others persisted, they would have been long wiped out. Additionally, Bloodraven encourages Bran to embrace "darkness". Combined with Melisandre's vision, this seems like a significant hint that there is a bit more moral ambiguity going on with the Others than the people of Westeros had been lead to believe.

As for the Wights, they may simply be mindless thralls. They obviously don't speak (as opposed to coldhands and other undead figures such as Lady Stoneheart and Beric Dondarrion). It seems likely they simply aren't sentient and "programmed" to attack anything warm, almost like traditional "zombies," which in some stories do retain a bit of memory as well. They could be protecting the CotF/Bloodraven's lair from the Free Folk, who as humans wouldn't be warded off by the magic that keeps the Wights out.


Nice theory!
KiwiBird - Would Bran have traveled so far to serve such evil forces as he's been told about since he was a child? Obviously he wouldn't (and he didn't, he did it under the assumption he's going to find the CotF)
Maybe it's all just a clever deception, designed to draw Bran there (for some reason we don't know about yet) - meaning that Coldhands was pretending to fight the others while he's actually just one of them. And i'd also like to point out that the wights outside the cave might in fact be guarding the cave.

I agree with your point about religion. We've seen no evidence to conclude that gods exist, other than in people's minds.
If you haven't read it yet, there's a discussion about the different religions in the forum.

Thanks! Right I had a similar thought about the Wights as guardians, specifically against the Free Folk I imagine, if this is the case. It certainly seems the Wights simply lack intelligence--they don't speak at the very least, whereas coldhands obviously does.

Meddler- Welcome to the forum, and congratulations on an amazing first post. The only point I'd disagree with is that the Others are only seen at night, but that doesn't really affect your overall theory.

Having said that, I think it's unlikely that your entire theory holds up, although parts of it may. i look forward to seeing lots more posts from you :)

Thanks!! Yeah, I mean there are way too many details for them all to be accurate, I was sort of just free flowing from a few particular points that could be relevant:
A) The Others probably aren't inherently malevolent--no more than R'hllor is anyway. Martin doesn't seem keen on painting such clear moral pictures.
B) The religion of R'hllor likely has a cultural background in Asshai that we haven't been given access to yet.
C) Given A and B, there may be some connection with the Shadow lands or more generally that part of the world and the Others, since they also seem to appear as a significant element of the religion as well. There isn't any specific counter evidence to contradict the idea, though there isn't any strong specific evidence to support it either, just some subtle potential tie-ins.

The evidence for all of this though is so vague that there are a million different directions one could take it in. I just thought it was an interesting concept to explore while we wait for TWoW.
 
Yeah it definitely seems a bit thin there in a sense, I'll agree, but then we have to resolve this issue with Melisandre's vision of Bloodraven and Bran as agents of the "Great Other". Is she simply mistaken? Perhaps the "Great Other" has nothing to do with "The Others"? These two possibilities seem at least as unlikely to me. On the other hand, the CotF have been north of the wall, essentially trapped with the Others for centuries, have they simply been hiding from them the whole time? Their numbers were already greatly dwindled following the Andal invasion, and they freely admit they are too few in number to avoid extinction. It seems likely if their hostilities with the Others persisted, they would have been long wiped out. Additionally, Bloodraven encourages Bran to embrace "darkness". Combined with Melisandre's vision, this seems like a significant hint that there is a bit more moral ambiguity going on with the Others than the people of Westeros had been lead to believe.

As for the Wights, they may simply be mindless thralls. They obviously don't speak (as opposed to coldhands and other undead figures such as Lady Stoneheart and Beric Dondarrion). It seems likely they simply aren't sentient and "programmed" to attack anything warm, almost like traditional "zombies," which in some stories do retain a bit of memory as well. They could be protecting the CotF/Bloodraven's lair from the Free Folk, who as humans wouldn't be warded off by the magic that keeps the Wights out.




Thanks! Right I had a similar thought about the Wights as guardians, specifically against the Free Folk I imagine, if this is the case. It certainly seems the Wights simply lack intelligence--they don't speak at the very least, whereas coldhands obviously does.



Thanks!! Yeah, I mean there are way too many details for them all to be accurate, I was sort of just free flowing from a few particular points that could be relevant:
A) The Others probably aren't inherently malevolent--no more than R'hllor is anyway. Martin doesn't seem keen on painting such clear moral pictures.
B) The religion of R'hllor likely has a cultural background in Asshai that we haven't been given access to yet.
C) Given A and B, there may be some connection with the Shadow lands or more generally that part of the world and the Others, since they also seem to appear as a significant element of the religion as well. There isn't any specific counter evidence to contradict the idea, though there isn't any strong specific evidence to support it either, just some subtle potential tie-ins.

The evidence for all of this though is so vague that there are a million different directions one could take it in. I just thought it was an interesting concept to explore while we wait for TWoW.
I'm not convinced that The Others aren't malevolent. The prologue of aGoT certainly seems to depict them as being pretty vicious and at the very least willing to kill seemingly just for the sake of killing. Also, if you were to look at a map of Westeros, you'd see and area called "Land of Always Winter". This at least implies that this is their place of origin, although that area may be accessible from other parts of the world.

i love a good crackpot theory, though. Keep working at it and refine it. It's certainly a fascinating premise. I liked linking AA to Asshai
 
True enough, I suppose more what I meant was that their intentions towards Westeros aren't entirely malevolent, or rather that they aren't strictly "evil" and aim towards death and destruction (compared, to, say Sauron from LotR or The Dark Side of the Force from Star Wars). It would seem to sort of go against a lot of what ASoIaF is all about, its so laden with moral ambiguity, its part of what makes it so appealing. Consider how the CotF and First Men must have seemed to each other on first contact. They both likely seemed vicious and malevolent, but they weren't motivated by hatred for one another, the hatred was a product of other motives, and they eventually were able to form a truce.

Now, it is certainly possible that the aim of the Others is simpler, and more about the cold and darkness necessary for their survival, perhaps spreading it to other parts of the world, and that its as simple as they must be stopped for humanity to survive. An idea like this would make more sense in terms of building an explanation for the funky seasons--warring magical factions, one that craves light and heat and another darkness and cold. But it just seems to absolute, and I just can't get over the implications the Bran storyline has here. I find it very hard to believe Bran is going to be "corrupted," yet the hint seems very clear that he is going to wind up aligned with the Others or at the very least in opposition to the Red Faith. I tend to believe there is going to be some kind of resolution to this conflict that is much greyer than simply one faction is "good" and "wins" and the other is "evil" and "loses," especially with such important, central, progtagonistic characters tied to both sides (I suppose you could argue that there isn't, in fact, a "protagonist" attached to the "light" side, though I think one could make a pretty convincing case than Dany is that protagonist as the Dragon Queen who is immune to fire, etc., even if its not directly related to the Red Faith).
 
I agree with your reading of the different religions:there's a thread of unexplained magic common to all of them to suggest anthropomorphic recreations according to cultural contexts. Probably, something larger like Gaia, the earth spirit, though not as powerful as the sentient Solaris, definitely exists; a raw source of magic that everyone (including the Others, the children of the forest, and the demons of the misty lands) tap according to their abilities.

But the others are indeed malevolent. They are crueler than the slave masters; the way they treat all other sentient beings as scum and zombie automatons rules out whether their inherent goodness becomes applicable in their dealings with humans or horses. They don't have tangible biological bodies either: they turn to smoke when killed. And they enjoy killing: they circle round their prey, and play at duels, while knowing they are invincible against common swords. A reconciliation with the Others? May the Others take away such thoughts!

The real problem to having sympathetic Others, though, lies in GRRM's use of the narrative technique. Since the narration comes in entirely through POV characters, to sufficiently "humanize" the Others, there has to be someone internal to them narrating to us consistently over a long time-the way we had of the Lannisters. Whoever he is, Coldhands is too close to the human condition to report accurately; so is Bran who had the best irrational lessons in fear from old Nan's stories.

As GRRM says he won't introduce newer POV characters in the next; I guess the Others will stay evil; the way they really are.
 
Good points, for sure. If we are to get a sympathetic perspective on the Others, I would assume it would come down second hand from Bloodraven via Bran. I could imagine this working, as Bloodraven is far enough removed from humanity to believably present something so alien, and Bran, being trapped in his own body and being exposed to these new powers and experiences may fearfully come to understand.

There's also a malevolence to the Red Priesthood as well, though we have direct access to Melisandre's perspective and understand her motivation is generally benevolent. R'hllor, though, often seems quite evil, even if he is just a combined personification of magic and ideology. Innocents are burned in his name, Melisandre's birthing of shadow-assasins, intolerance for other magicks and religions, Catelyn's reanimation as Stoneheart, perhaps to a lesser degree Dondarrion's as well (he wasn't transformed to the degree Cat was, and her transformation may have had more to do with the manner of her death, but he was losing himself more and more with each ressurection). No, no zombie-thralls are created in R'hllor's name, but I'm not sure the rest of what we know screams pure evil the way you suggest. Sure, the Others toyed with the rangers in the AGoT prologue, but that's hardly worse than what someone like, say, Gregor Clegane did with his enemies.

However, your analysis is more than likely dead on, but I just can't help feeling this itch about where the Bran story is going. Melisandre views him as a threat. Bloodraven is teaching him that darkness is okay. Is Bloodraven attempting to corrupt Bran? If so why are the CotF helping? Are Bran and Bloodraven and the CotF's motives separate from the Others entirely? This seems more plausible but still somehow unlikely.
 
Also, in terms of the length of the narrative "turnaround," I'm not so sure it would have to be as it was with the Lannisters, because the Others are such ambiguous entities right now. We've only encountered them twice, briefly. With the Lannisers we had detailed and believeable accusations against their character and credibility through other characters. It had to be explained how Jaime felt when he slew the Mad King and he had to be shown to feel remorse in general (most notably towards Brienne) before we could trust, let alone forgive him after he threw Bran from the tower. With Tyrion, we were always meant to feel somewhat sympathetic towards him, if a bit suspicious. He was still accused of some terrible things that we had to take the time to unravel the truth of. As for Cersei, instead of being lead to feel sympathy, we were lead to understand a bit better her pathology.

None of this would need to apply to an alien race of beings that as best we know men have never been able to even communicate with. We don't need to hear a personal monologue from an Other on what it was like to toy with Will and the other Rangers the AGoT prologue to create sympathy, we aren't emotionally attached to any narrative details involving individuals that have encountered the others to need such a personal explanation. It would certainly be a twisted sympathy, but an external, second hand narrative could well suffice, as long as it bridged the gap between the human and alien sufficiently, i.e. Bloodraven (I do agree though that Coldhands seems a bit too limited and tragic to fill this role).
 
Meddler, as a general response to some of what you said above, I'd point out that it's in no way safe to assume that The others and The Old gods are one and the same. I think it's likely that they aren't, and that the whole darkness of the old gods, light of R'hllor "thing" is meant to be the embodiment of the interedependence of all opposites to create a whole, very much in the way Eastern philosophies talk about Yin and Yang. of course, I'm not sure what the Yang would be if the others are yin, perhaps it's the CotF, or maybe someone(s) that we haven't met yet, maybe the ones that cause the Doom that befell Valyria
 
Oh absolutely, I in no way meant to imply that the "Others" and the "Old Gods" are the same. It may be that I'm reading the hints a bit too strongly, I'm largely relying on Melisandre's interpretation of Bran and Bloodraven as a threat and agents of the "Great Other" when that may not be the case at all, or maybe the "Great Other" isn't even related to the Others (though this seems unlikely for a number of reasons). Then Bloodraven's urging of Bran to embrace the darkness, which was in a chapter that followed almost immediately after, stood in such stark contrast to Melisandre's views, that I may be jumping the gun in believing Melisandre's interpretation indicates the darkness aligns with the Others. In fact I agree with you that there's a sort of falst duality at play here between "light" and "dark. In fact that was part of my point, but I didn't really see any way the Others are independent of that cycle. I do like the idea idea that perhaps the Others are part of a separate cycle, where the opposing/congruent force is what caused the Doom. But it seems more likely to me that it is the magic of R'hllor that is what lines up with the Others and that this is all a part of the same cycle.
 
Oh absolutely, I in no way meant to imply that the "Others" and the "Old Gods" are the same. It may be that I'm reading the hints a bit too strongly, I'm largely relying on Melisandre's interpretation of Bran and Bloodraven as a threat and agents of the "Great Other" when that may not be the case at all, or maybe the "Great Other" isn't even related to the Others (though this seems unlikely for a number of reasons). Then Bloodraven's urging of Bran to embrace the darkness, which was in a chapter that followed almost immediately after, stood in such stark contrast to Melisandre's views, that I may be jumping the gun in believing Melisandre's interpretation indicates the darkness aligns with the Others. In fact I agree with you that there's a sort of falst duality at play here between "light" and "dark. In fact that was part of my point, but I didn't really see any way the Others are independent of that cycle. I do like the idea idea that perhaps the Others are part of a separate cycle, where the opposing/congruent force is what caused the Doom. But it seems more likely to me that it is the magic of R'hllor that is what lines up with the Others and that this is all a part of the same cycle.
Good theories get better with good discussion :)

While I trust Melisandre's motivations (for the most part), I think that we can say with certainty that her ability to read the flames is not as good as she thinks it is, and that at least some of what she thinks and beleives has to be viewed with great skepticism. This is a perfect example

I pray for a glimpse of Azor Ahai, and R’hllor shows me only Snow.

Also, remember that Melisandre isn't sure if Bloodraven and Bran are "the enemy", she asks herself IF they indeed are.
 
An idea like this would make more sense in terms of building an explanation for the funky seasons--warring magical factions, one that craves light and heat and another darkness and cold.

I am apparently an easy mark for authors with a good tale to tell. I just assumed the odd seasons were the result of a elliptical planetary orbit around the sun. I like the competing magic ideas much better. :D
 
Great Thread. Precisely TODAY I posted a question about this on the main ADWD thread, just before this one came up on my screen. The posts are too long for me to be able to read through all of them here at work, but I am taking five minutes to copy my earlier post here, since it may be relevant:

"Who exactly are the OTHERS and do they have an intelligent purpose other than to advance "zombie-movie style" above the wall? And what types of "others" are there. I believe (I may be wrong) that we've seen at least two types of others: the blue eyed reanimated corpses of any regular human being / beast that is killed by the others and some higher, more sophisticated and intelligent form, generally evil but not necessarily (e.g. Coldhands)...

But something that Tormund Giantsbane (I think) said really caught my eye. He said something (I paraphrase from memory) like: "But how do you fight their masters... how do you fight a mist".

Who are these mist-formed masters of the others, how are they coordinated and what is their ultimate purpose? What is the ultimate purpose of their god, may be the question, but I am thinking more about their civilization / organization, for lack of better words."

Much of this has been addressed in Meddler's first post, which I will read more carefully later. But what about the misty masters?
 
Great Thread. Precisely TODAY I posted a question about this on the main ADWD thread, just before this one came up on my screen. The posts are too long for me to be able to read through all of them here at work, but I am taking five minutes to copy my earlier post here, since it may be relevant:

"Who exactly are the OTHERS and do they have an intelligent purpose other than to advance "zombie-movie style" above the wall? And what types of "others" are there. I believe (I may be wrong) that we've seen at least two types of others: the blue eyed reanimated corpses of any regular human being / beast that is killed by the others and some higher, more sophisticated and intelligent form, generally evil but not necessarily (e.g. Coldhands)...

But something that Tormund Giantsbane (I think) said really caught my eye. He said something (I paraphrase from memory) like: "But how do you fight their masters... how do you fight a mist".

Who are these mist-formed masters of the others, how are they coordinated and what is their ultimate purpose? What is the ultimate purpose of their god, may be the question, but I am thinking more about their civilization / organization, for lack of better words."

Much of this has been addressed in Meddler's first post, which I will read more carefully later. But what about the misty masters?
I think the mists that Tormund described might have been their armor. I think the guys that killed Waymar Royce were "regular" Others, in the shimmering armor and strange swords. I think that the blue eyed walking dead have been reanimated by these regular Others, and the is Great Other that is either the boss or the God over all of them.
 
I should have known that if it was something different from what we had read until now it would have been picked up by someone! Thanks for the clarification.
 
The Others are seemingly ageless and with mysterious abilities that include agelessness through something like cryogenic sleep.While little is known of what they call themselves, or their purpose, their arrival through the ages has been partly documented. Here's what Sam reads at the Castle Black archives:

The Others come when it is cold, most of the tales agree. Or else it gets cold when they come. Sometimes they appear during snowstorms and melt away when the skies clear. They hide from the light of the sun and emerge by night … or else night falls when they emerge. Some stories speak of them riding the corpses of dead animals. Bears, direwolves, mammoths, horses, it makes no matter, so long as the beast is dead.
Suddenly this line caught my attention. Again, it's Sam telling Jon:

The children of the forest used to give the Night’s Watch a hundred obsidian daggers every year, during the Age of Heroes.
While Bloodraven teaches Bran not to shun darkness, it appears that the Children of the Forest were historically not entirely sympathetic to the Others, even when the first men almost wiped them out of Westeros. Nope, no history of a united front existing between the Children and the Others, working against the humans.

I think Tyrion (of the forums) got it right: the children exist to maintain balance, in the Ying-Yang way, than to align themselves on the side of one righteous or the other. I think they and Bloodraven are helping Bran understand the bigger picture of the universe, you know, cosmic harmony, and the usual Tai Chi stuff that will help him grow awesome.
 
The original history of the First Men was that they warred with the Children of the Forest until the others came, which they could not defeat until the Children of the Forest joined them and used their magic, right? Isn't that from the first book?
 

Back
Top