Dunno bout this but the original Mel Brooks film with Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder is a comedy classic.BookStop said:Ok- I just watched The Producers, with Uma Thurmon, Matthew Broderick, and Nathan Lane.
ravenus said:Dunno bout this but the original Mel Brooks film with Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder is a comedy classic.
kyektulu said:House OF Wax... what can I say, another inane teeny slasher flick, and what makes it even worse it involves the spoilt, useless brat Paris Hilton...
kyektulu said:
House OF Wax... what can I say, another inane teeny slasher flick, and what makes it even worse it involves the spoilt, useless brat Paris Hilton...
Well ... yes and no. The Vincent Price was itself a remake of a 1932 film with Lionel Atwill and Fay Wray, titled Mystery of the Wax Museum, one of the early two-tone technicolor films, and the only good thing about the new House of Wax is that when it came out on DVD you could buy a 2-for-1 package that also included the original Mystery film. I've seen it more than once, and it remains quite good. In some ways, it is better than the later Warner Bros. remake with Price (though I grew up on that one, have seen it twice in 3-D and have enormous fondness for the film). They're both somewhat campy melodrama (in fact, they toned it down a bit for the remake, as one of the assistants in the original was a serious junkie rather than a drunk), but Michael Curtiz directed the original, and his work is always worth seeing.steve12553 said:The original House of Wax was a wonderful, gimicky, Vincent Price, 3-D classic that I was really impressed with as a child. I couldn't consider watching a remake. I actually got a chance to see it in 3-D with the glasses and all.
j. d. worthington said:Well ... yes and no. The Vincent Price was itself a remake of a 1932 film with Lionel Atwill and Fay Wray, titled Mystery of the Wax Museum, one of the early two-tone technicolor films, and the only good thing about the new House of Wax is that when it came out on DVD you could buy a 2-for-1 package that also included the original Mystery film. I've seen it more than once, and it remains quite good. In some ways, it is better than the later Warner Bros. remake with Price (though I grew up on that one, have seen it twice in 3-D and have enormous fondness for the film). They're both somewhat campy melodrama (in fact, they toned it down a bit for the remake, as one of the assistants in the original was a serious junkie rather than a drunk), but Michael Curtiz directed the original, and his work is always worth seeing.
kyektulu said:A few dire films I have seen lately are:
Lost In Translation... stupid and uncomprehendable, whats the point...
Creep... English Film, dont waste your time with it.
House OF Wax... what can I say, another inane teeny slasher flick, and what makes it even worse it involves the spoilt, useless brat Paris Hilton...
Haven't seen the film but couldn't resist this PJ...maybe it was..."Lost in Translation" for the disgruntled viewerroddglenn said:How could you dislike Lost in Translation????
ravenus said:Haven't seen the film but couldn't resist this PJ...maybe it was..."Lost in Translation" for the disgruntled viewer![]()
Yeah, well, it didn't seem important to what I was saying (though I've always had a bit of a thing about Carolyn Jones, I must admit) and besides, if I said it all -- not that I don't sometimes at least seem to try -- what would anyone else have to say.steve12553 said:You left off the part about Carolyn Jones (Morticia Addams) and Charles Buchinski (Bronson) having minor parts in the films (50's House of Wax). Your right about the earlier version too. I had forgotten that although I've yet to see it.
j. d. worthington said:Steve: No offense taken (or given, I hope). I was amused. I was also being a smartmouth ...
Same here.j. d. worthington said:I think in my case it's just because it's congenital....![]()
I agree, I thought it was a pretty insightful movie and Bill Murray was brilliant!roddglenn said:How could you dislike Lost in Translation???? I thought it was a beautiflly crafted film with superb performances from Bill Murray and Scarlett Johanssen and a very good story and script. The point was a friendship blossoming between two strangers stranded in a foreign land that they didn't understand and bridging gaps between age and background. I couldn't fault it myself, but horses for courses, I guess.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Post the worst AI and text reader voice overs | Technology | 0 | |
B | WORST MOVIES OF ALL TIME(Non-Science Fiction) | General Film Discussion | 29 | |
B | WORST MOVIE CASTINGS | General Film Discussion | 125 | |
![]() |
Comic to Movie - best/worst/general chat | Graphic Novels & Comics | 69 | |
I | Worst Sci-Fi movie of all time | General Film Discussion | 297 |