Ok so I have a novel which stretches over the space of 40 years and not all of them are eventful. Plus I only have 8 main characters (10 at a stretch), which means there are time hops in it, and which keep consistently coming back to me as a structural problem. I did consider leaving out the first section which is the worst offender and got told to behave by my lovely alpha readers. Which still leaves me a problem.
I don't want to do flashbacks; this is a very personal journey that the reader undertakes with the characters and I really feel that playing with that journey isn't what I want.
For the same reason I don't want to extend the character range, they're fulfilling what I need for the story line.
So, what's the best way to structure this so it's reasonably unobtrusive to the reader?
I can
a do the 18 months on job (which will happen about 7 times if I do it each time I jump
b divide it into sections incorporating chronological chapters; the first ones woud be c. 10000 in length (3/4 chapters each) with a final section of about 40000 which is pretty chronological.
Which do you find easier to read? The big bold seperate sections of the subtler time's moved on note.
I don't want to do flashbacks; this is a very personal journey that the reader undertakes with the characters and I really feel that playing with that journey isn't what I want.
For the same reason I don't want to extend the character range, they're fulfilling what I need for the story line.
So, what's the best way to structure this so it's reasonably unobtrusive to the reader?
I can
a do the 18 months on job (which will happen about 7 times if I do it each time I jump
b divide it into sections incorporating chronological chapters; the first ones woud be c. 10000 in length (3/4 chapters each) with a final section of about 40000 which is pretty chronological.
Which do you find easier to read? The big bold seperate sections of the subtler time's moved on note.