Twitter pitches - thoughts

Mouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
10,730
Location
Devon
Agents/writers/publishers on Twitter occasionally do a pitch day, where you have to pitch your novel in less than 140 characters and use a certain hashtag. Agents will then come along, favourite or reply to the ones they like and ask for you to send them something.

Now, you obviously don't need a request from an agent to be able to send them something - you just send them something according to their guidelines. What is nice about pitching on Twitter is that you can at least tell if your pitches are working (if you get a request) and that you know the agent is interested in the first place.

So far they seem to be very heavily leaning towards YA, as has been pointed out before, and very US-ified, which again, has been pointed out before. But, always worth having a punt, right? Plus you can watch the feed and see what others are pitching (and baffle yourself over people's terrible grammar and nonsensical pitches) and see what people seem to be writing at the mo (lots of zombies, I fancy).

The first one I did was for Entranced Publishing - an ebook publisher. I got a request for a partial from an off-the-cuff pitch I decided to do because I saw springs doing it. I sent it off, got a reply from the publisher asking a question about the synopsis ('it doesn't sound like it has a happy ending - does it?' and 'is there much romance?') and I replied honestly. There's not a lot of romance (all right, hardly any) and Entranced are romance publishers really. She never came back to me to say ok, thanks but no thanks, but that's fair enough.

Now on Friday a few of us had a go at PitMad. You do your pitch and add the hashtag and hope an agent comes along, likes the sound of it, and requests something.

My pre-written pitches weren't going down well at all, so I fired off one off the top of my head and got an instant 'favourite' which, from this particular agent meant send the query and first ten pages.

So I check her guidelines, have a look at the other authors she's repping and send off my query and ten pages. I see on the agent's site it says 'no response after a month means no.' I'm more than happy about that, it means I don't have to worry, or do any chasing.

But then she starts Tweeting comments on the queries she's reading. And that's interesting, you can see her thoughts... but then you start wondering 'is that me?' 'Is that mine she's talking about?'

She posts things like 'great writing, great twists and turns. Request' and then 'great writing, but too much dialogue' or 'this one's brilliant, but too slow.'

I think, if you have time to comment on the queries on Twitter, you have time to reply to that person you've just tweeted about telling them the same thing. So now I'm sat here thinking mine's very dialogue heavy, was she talking about me? And thinking about re-writing, when she might've just thought mine was flat out crap.

A little bit of feedback goes a hell of a long way.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like an interesting way to go about it. Yeah, having your work commented on anonymously (well, author's name reserved) that way reminds me of my first workshop class at university.

I'm far from the pitching stage, but thanks for the detailed report.
 
Chin up, Mouse. :)

I know I'm cynical about the Twitter side of things, but it's more the case of not allowing myself to think there are easy short-cuts to be made.

However, sometimes it works - Scott Lynch was signed up after posting on a forum and got noticed by a commissioning editor. :)
 
It's almost an instant gratification thing. Oh, they like my pitch! My novel appeals!

I fancy it's just that little bit more frustrating than going about it the 'traditional' way though.
 
Well, fast pitch, fast response would be the advantage, I imagine. Hopefully you get some personal responses from these agents.
 
I can see this would cause a lot of frustration. The only thing I can suggest is to take her comments and see if any of your readers have made similar remarks. Otherwise you'll probably go crazy.

Alternatively, we can all band together and form our own publishing house!
 
I've never had anyone say too much dialogue, but maybe they were being nice!
 
Or maybe you're over thinking it!

Have you had a professional edit done?
 
Short and sweet Mouse! Was there any mention of too much dialogue?
 
I am short and sweet. ;) And nope, there wasn't. But I dunno... in chapter one I think there's two words of dialogue spoken, but chapter two is very dialogue heavy.
 
:rolleyes:

Personally I would say dialogue heavy doesn't necessarily mean too much dialogue. If the dialogue has slowed the pace down and made it noticeable that there is a lot of dialogue then ok; but if moves the story along seamlessly, then no issue.
 
Well I think it's all right but I don't know if she was talking about me or not!
 
You may never know. Since none of your other readers have mentioned it, I'm going to go out on a limb and say she wasn't talking about you :)
 
Mouse, it wasn't you. Doubt anything else if you want, but your dialogue is some of the strongest I've read and I wince at clunky dialogue.

Now, if she has said there was no description.... :p

Chill. It is a nasty way of doing business and you don't want an agent who deals with people so callously.
 
I can't remember who it is now, but there's one agent who goes through queries from her inbox doing "5 queries in 5 tweets". Its scary the way she dismisses work, but then you do have to remember that the replies are tailored to "tweet-size" bites; I'm sure her actual thoughts on the queries are more complex then that!!

Same goes for any twitter-comments on work being reviewed; its a bit like us trying to get our stories down to 75 words - they have to fit their words into tweets.
 
Too stressful by half. Besides the point my WIP Is completely unsuited to a 140 character pitch. Makes life easy for the agents though...and it is a good platform if you've got something that will suit them.
 
Not being much of a social media kind of guy, this has spun me out a little bit. I'm not sure if I could pitch in 140 characters.

Maybe I should get a Twitter account and start practicing...

From what little I know of Twitter, however, can't you reply directly to someone? So they could have given you direct feedback but instead replied with ambiguous posts? Is that right?
 
From what little I know of Twitter, however, can't you reply directly to someone? So they could have given you direct feedback but instead replied with ambiguous posts? Is that right?


You can reply or mention someone. That way it still shows up in their timeline. Starting a post with @username is a reply or direct message. Having the @username elsewhere in the post is a mention.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top