Does Martin go into any more history about the Dothraki than I see in Book I? They start off the book as the major barbarian baddies, sort of like the Hordes of the Asian Plains (Huns, Turks, Mongols) when Game of Thrones begins, but then rather quickly seem to just drop off once we're introduced to the peoples from Beyond the Wall, becoming more like just a backdrop and starting point for Dany's adventures. Yet in Book I they're like about to become the new Mongols.
What gives, why introduce a major player and then just write them out? It has actually happened, and a lot, that's true, but it's bad storytelling, "If you have an rifle over the mantelpiece when the play begins you better use it by Act III."
Or maybe I'm missing something that happens later on? Tell me if you know, because I've seen the first two seasons and don't intend to see/read, any more except the book version of Volume 1 at this point. Some aspects of the story interest me greatly, but not enough to drag myself through all the other BS Martin seems obsessed with.
What gives, why introduce a major player and then just write them out? It has actually happened, and a lot, that's true, but it's bad storytelling, "If you have an rifle over the mantelpiece when the play begins you better use it by Act III."
Or maybe I'm missing something that happens later on? Tell me if you know, because I've seen the first two seasons and don't intend to see/read, any more except the book version of Volume 1 at this point. Some aspects of the story interest me greatly, but not enough to drag myself through all the other BS Martin seems obsessed with.