tylenol4000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 100
So I'v been reading a bit of Van Vogt lately, and I have to say, I'm quite enjoying what I'v read, Future Glitter was a really enjoyable dystopia. Slan, well, I think it goes without saying that it's an unrelenting thriller. Yes, I just said that.
I feel he doesn't get as much respect as he should. It's true what they say: he was Philip K. Dick before Philip K. Dick. A lot of his prose actually sounds like PKD. I'm disappointed that, while Dick is getting a whole new following and will be in print for many years to come, people are missing out on the works of an author that greatly influenced him; I feel like PKDs following could, possibly, lead to a new life for Van Vogt's works. But he's gone forgotten for a long time. I saw an article on io9 about authors that could be Hollywoods next PKD. They listed authors like Stross, and Rudy Rucker, whom I think would be great choices (especially Rucker, hollywood needs to focus on his stories). Anyways, io9 failed to recognize AE Van Vogt. That's crazy. He's the first guy I thought of when i saw the article. So many short stories, so many novels; so many potential crazy films.
Anyways, what I'm really here to say is that I think the criticism of Van Vogt is unfair. I keep reading about his lousy prose, an criticisms of how he wrote his novels. Similar criticisms that Dick gets, actually. But the fact is, he tells a good story, with ideas most people could never think of. People need to take another look at AE Van Vogt.
I feel he doesn't get as much respect as he should. It's true what they say: he was Philip K. Dick before Philip K. Dick. A lot of his prose actually sounds like PKD. I'm disappointed that, while Dick is getting a whole new following and will be in print for many years to come, people are missing out on the works of an author that greatly influenced him; I feel like PKDs following could, possibly, lead to a new life for Van Vogt's works. But he's gone forgotten for a long time. I saw an article on io9 about authors that could be Hollywoods next PKD. They listed authors like Stross, and Rudy Rucker, whom I think would be great choices (especially Rucker, hollywood needs to focus on his stories). Anyways, io9 failed to recognize AE Van Vogt. That's crazy. He's the first guy I thought of when i saw the article. So many short stories, so many novels; so many potential crazy films.
Anyways, what I'm really here to say is that I think the criticism of Van Vogt is unfair. I keep reading about his lousy prose, an criticisms of how he wrote his novels. Similar criticisms that Dick gets, actually. But the fact is, he tells a good story, with ideas most people could never think of. People need to take another look at AE Van Vogt.