Questions Being Asked About Number of Early Human Species

Ursa major

Bearly Believable
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
24,267
Location
England
The spectacular fossilised skull of an ancient human ancestor that died nearly two million years ago in central Asia has forced scientists to rethink the story of early human evolution.

Anthropologists unearthed the skull at a site in Dmanisi, a small town in southern Georgia, where other remains of human ancestors, simple stone tools and long-extinct animals have been dated to 1.8m years old.

Experts believe the skull is one of the most important fossil finds to date, but it has proved as controversial as it is stunning. Analysis of the skull and other remains at Dmanisi suggests that scientists have been too ready to name separate species of human ancestors in Africa. Many of those species may now have to be wiped from the textbooks.
From Skull of Homo erectus throws story of human evolution into disarray | Science | theguardian.com.


Setting aside any controversy surrounding the allocation of early human remains to different species (or not), I hope it's only the journalist who (mistakenly) believes that Georgia is in Central Asia.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top