Review: The Vorkosigan books by Lois McMasterBujold

SFF Chronicles News

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
1,458
23rd June 2013 03:38 PM

Jo Zebedee



For quite a while those who know my SFF reading tastes have been encouraging me to explore Lois McMaster Bujold’s Vorkosigan books. I did read the first two, Shards of Honour and Barrayar, a couple of years ago, and found them heavy on the romance side and a little implausible in terms of the characters’ motivations. I reached the end of them – up to the point where it became evident that Cordelia and Aral’s son was going to have lingering birth defects on a planet with deep-seated racial intolerance to any deformities. Interesting, I thought, but not so much so that I wanted to continue with the series.

Having read a number of threads on the SFF chronicles about the books they continued to pique my interest, particularly the character descriptions of Miles Vorkosigan, and when I was given the opportunity to run amok with £10 on Amazon, I decided to buy something not readily available in the local shops. I choose the compilation Young Miles, which brings together two books and a novella, outlining Miles’s early military career.

I was hooked, quickly, on the central character and his world. The determination to strive past physical limitations and the relentless energy that drives Miles keeps the story at break-neck speed. The wider world and characters: Ivan (aka that idiot Ivan), Miles’s attractive but not intellectually driven cousin; Cordelia, who has grown much since the first two books; and Aral, the father whose reputation Miles must live up to on a native planet that rejects Miles and declaims him as a “mutie lord”. That Bujold combined the central character and his limitations with an alter ego, the suave and polished Admiral Naismith, further developed the character and the balancing act between dutiful son on a duty-bound planet struggling to accept him, and dashing intergalactic spy worked well, in my opinion.

In contrast to the young, hyperactive, Miles shown in the early books, we have the post-Admiral Naismith of Memory and beyond. Older, with years of operations – and one death — behind him, and a legacy of feedback that leaves him struggling with his body image, this Miles is more intriguing. Memory, in particular, explores the contrast between the Miles of the early books and a poised, able diplomat. The later books are more assured, with a nice touch for comedy fully evident in A Civil Campaign. The use of Miles’s cloned brother, Mark, as a mirror for Miles and a contrast to him – first captured in Mirror Dance – is handled deftly.

On the minus side, Bujold likes her sci-fi light, with many concepts not fully explained. Her military set-up, particularly in the early books, with the depiction of a hierarchy prepared to employ a soldier who is both insubordinate and unable to pass their physical requirements, stretches belief. So, too, does the sense of a hero who can talk his way out of any trouble, an invincibility, if you like. In addition, Bujold’s tactic of throwing what she can at the characters left me a little unsatisfied, as she tended to gloss over the actuality of the events, whilst openly using them to frame storylines and character motivations.

In the later books, Bujold moves past much of this. Miles’s military career fully supports his status as a tactical specialist, and the various ailments/mental fragilities he has picked up over the series create a hero who has lost the sheen of invincibility. The question changes from will Miles survive – to which we give a resounding yes – to in what state Miles will survive in. That he has an ability to embrace life’s opportunities when offered stands in stark contrast to the challenges he faces, and, sometimes, falls under, imparting an overall sense of hope to the series.

Bujold’s writing style is light and easy to read. Her point of view discipline is very good, with the world mostly being seen through strict third limited perspective. Her dialogue is lively and her character observations good. (A tendency to leave out question marks had me questioning, however.)

Despite the lightness of touch, many themes are explored, particularly those around our acceptance of people who deviate from the norm. This theme is visited not just with Miles’s birth damage and the prejudice he faces – framed against that of Taura’s story, who was deliberately engineered – but also in the quaddie tales, about a race of now-outdated mutants designed to operate in zero-g conditions. Mark’s fight to overcome the split aspects of his damaged persona takes this further, and Ethan of Athos’s exploration of homosexuality and its acceptance appears another extension of a similar theme.

For anyone who likes their space opera light, fast and fun I’d recommend the Vorkosigan books. Their focus on character rather than science appealed to me and, given their popularity, many others it would seem.

Jo Zebedee
 
I like Bujold's stories but I have to comment on her paradigm of technology 700 years in the future.

She has genetic engineering 500 years in the future with the quaddies of Falling Free but the use of computers is rather limited and robots are essentially nonexistent in her universe. With everything that is happening with robotics right now her future is rather unrealistic. But her ideas of schooling and working are hardly any different from today. I really can't imagine that being the case in 700 years.

psik
 
I have no problem with the robotics - there are so many ethics involved, not to mention economics etc, how do we know where acceptablility of robot workers will go?

But regardless of the sf arguments which we could go round and round in. It's her world, it's up to her how she creates and envisionages it. It's down to the reader if they're willing to suspend their disbelief enough to enter it. It sounds like your perceptions of the future makes it too big a jump for you, which is fine but, to be honest, it didn't cross my mind - I just enjoyed entering the world she'd created. :)
 
Time for a little necromancy and a lot of explanation. Lois Bujold has been getting a lot less interest from readers than I would expect.

LMB.Memry.txt
7480 4585 1285 102 13 on: Oct 23, 2018
G/BRat = 104.913 Xcp3Rat = 5.422
Star3Prd = 568.84
13,465 ratings @ Mean: 4.44

9,765 5,948 1,665 218 121 [17,718]
on: Aug 30, 2022
G/Brat = 46.351 Xcp3Rat = 10.903
Star3Prd = 505.36

I have collected and processed data from Goodreads on a number of books. I stopped for a while and just checked Memory by Lois Bujold today. I don't think much of the Goodreads rating which is nothing but the Mean of the star rating by users.

I have a Good to Bad Ratio, G/BRat which is the sum of 5 and 4 stars divided by the sum of 1 and 2 stars.

Then there is the eXception Ratio, Xcp3Rat, which is 5 stars multiplied by 1.25 added to 4 stars and that sum divided by the 3 stars. This calculation is to show how much the readers consider the book to be better than average.

As you can see Memory got a Mean of 4.44 back in October of 2018. A G/BRat of almost 105 which means really low 1 & 2 stars. The Xcp3Rat was 5.422.

Now I have not checked this for more than 3 years.

G/Brat = 46.351 Xcp3Rat = 10.903
Star3Prd = 505.36 on Aug 30 2022

The G/BRat went down by more than 50%. I suppose the 1 stars going from 13 to 121 mostly explains that. But the exception doubled so the star product is still over 500 though down from 568.

What I am wondering is why so little growth in the number of ratings, 13,000 to less than 18,000 in almost 4 years though both Goodreads' and my rating system give it exceptionally high scores. The book is kind of far into the series though.

Bujold does not seem as popular as the quality of the writing and stories deserve but the people who do read her like her.

Here is a comparison, David Weber's Honor of the Queen

8883 8644 3239 410 118 on: March 27, 2018
G/BRat = 33.195 Xcp3Rat = 3.048
Star3Prd = 101.18
21,294 ratings @ Mean: 4.21

11,906 10,778 4,082 607 247 [27,620] Aug 30,22
G/BRat = 26.562. Xcp3Rat = 6.286. Star3Prd = 166.975

G/BRat went down and Xcp3Rat went up on both. Wonder why? Weber got more ratings over the time though.
 
Last edited:
I enjoyed both Bujold's and Weber's series but ultimately I gave up on both. Weber's became ever more tedious political thrillers (with a lot less of the thrills) whilst Bujold's become a little too tacky for me (too much romance and associated emotionalism for my taste). So I have given up on both, however, I felt that Weber's earlier HH books felt more plausible; over the years I have tired of the incredibly young cadet, usually with a disadvantage such as gender or disability, who succeeds where all their more experienced superiors have failed. I do still read and enjoy them occasionally for a lighter experience (Miles Cameron's Artifact Space most recently) but ultimately a crippled man barely out of his teens managing to become an enormously successful admiral of a band of mercenaries is pushing it a little for me. And as he gets older he must overcome prejudice and succeed in love (not my favourite direction). Nothing really wrong with that, it's a pretty good winning formula, and there are plenty of other examples that I've enjoyed over the years like Shepherd's Kris Longknife and Moon's Vatta, but in the end, it lacked enough substance to keep me engaged.

Let me stress that that is a very personal stance from someone who, on the whole, would rather the romance in his SF takes a bit of a back seat. ;)
 
I read Shards of Honour and I felt that, while it was a perfectly good book, it wasn't for me. I don't mind romance in novels, but this felt like a Romance novel in an SF setting, which wasn't my sort of thing. I get the feeling that the later books might be a bit less Romance-heavy.
 
I read Shards of Honour and I felt that, while it was a perfectly good book, it wasn't for me. I don't mind romance in novels, but this felt like a Romance novel in an SF setting, which wasn't my sort of thing. I get the feeling that the later books might be a bit less Romance-heavy.
I think Shards isn't a good example of the series (although others love it) and I almost gave up reading the series. It was originally Star Trek fan-fic, if I recall correctly, and then evolved into its own space. The Miles books are great but I think it does take until Brothers in Arms to really get going, but that and the next 4 books (Mirror Dance, Memory, Komarr and A Civil Campaign) are, for me, some of the best sci fi escapist books I've read.

I get what Vertigo is saying, too. Of course, it's implausible. But that's part of the fun of the series for me. As for the romantic direction, I think I'm safe in saying that A Civil Campaign is, potentially, the funniest sci fi book I've read. (A few here will snigger at the very mention of Bug Butter). But I don't mind a bit of romance. Having said that, I'm making my way through The Princess and the Scoundrel about Han/Leia (don't judge, we all need our downtime reads amongst all the heavy stuff...) and it is --- not good. Doing romance well in sci fi is a real art form.
 
think Shards isn't a good example of the series (although others love it) and I almost gave up reading the series.

In fairness, the same could be said about Space Captain Smith. They do get better! I often forget just how important fan-fic has been to SFF: it's never really factored into my writing, and I mentally associate it with YA stuff, but it's clearly been a big thing for some writers.

Romance (the genre, not romantic subplots) seems to me to be a bit like Horror or Erotica, in that it wants you to have a strong emotional reaction to the story. I'm not the target audience and it's often asking me to have an emotional response that I wouldn't do, so it doesn't work for me. I started reading a fantasy novel with quite an interesting premise a while ago, about a woman magically trapped in a village, and realised that it was a Romance story where she'd have to choose between Rugged Man and Classy Man, and my interest fell flat. Which is my problem, not the book's.
 
I read one of these a long time ago and enjoyed it a lot. Meant to go back to the series, but haven't quite gotten around to it yet.
 
Well there is plenty of it. :) You can read them out of order, but spoilers. I actually came to them via one of the later books and was fine reading it without having read the earlier, but there were give aways for earlier books. Since I'm a great re-reader it wasn't too much of a problem but there was a slight drop in ooh factor for plot twists. I've re-read this series quite a few times.
 
One unusual reason for reading the early Vorkosigan stories is searching for parallels between Barayar and Imperial Japan, which Bujold stated that she had taken as an inspiration. For example, one can find laws from the Nara period forbidding clan chiefs from keeping more than twenty armed guards. However, the Japanese leader that seems most relevant is Field Marshall Ōyama Iwao Ōyama Iwao - Wikipedia. The Wikipedia article notes that "Ōyama was disparaged by American reporter Trumbull White for failing to restrain his troops during the Port Arthur Massacre." He married Sutematsu Ōyama Sutematsu - Wikipedia who while Japanese had graduated from Vassar College and had been on the opposite side in the Boshin War. Alas his son died in an accidental explosion and did not get to command a mercenary navy.
 
Of course, it's implausible. But that's part of the fun of the series for me.
Absolutely! And that's why I do still read this style of book quite regularly. You might enjoy that Miles Cameron book Artifact Space that I mentioned, Jo. Not much romance in the first one but there was some and there may be more to come. Very much in the same heroic, adventure space opera spirit of these books and pretty well written too. Mind you it's the first book in a series of unknown size so requires waiting for subsequent volumes!
 
LOL

No one commented on the mathematical gobbledygook.

The trouble with just computing the Mean is that the maximum possible score is 5.00 and the lowest is 1.00. That is ridiculous for MILLIONS of different books.

My system has given scores as high as 800.

This is the lowest:

Demon Seed by Dean Koontz - - - - - - - - - - - 1973 2228 3162 4459 1678 569 on: March 27, 2018
G/BRat = 2.399 Xcp3Rat = 0.667 Star3Prd = 1.6
12,096 ratings @ Mean: 3.4

3.4 doesn't sound that bad for a Goodreads rating but I don't recall any lower.

Retraction:

Tumble & Fall by Alexandra Coutts
150 211 330 234 163 on: April 27, 2018 G/BRat = 0.909 Xcp3Rat = 0.604 Star3Prd = 0.55
1,088 ratings @ Mean: 2.95

That must be a bad book.
 
Last edited:
I read Shards of Honour and I felt that, while it was a perfectly good book, it wasn't for me. I don't mind romance in novels, but this felt like a Romance novel in an SF setting, which wasn't my sort of thing. I get the feeling that the later books might be a bit less Romance-heavy.
The latter half of Shards of Honor was much more interesting than the first half. The backwards Barrayaran culture becoming Galactic is a lot of what makes the Vorkosigan series interesting. The characters display the culture, like Miles being regarded as a mutant even though he is not. I don't know of anything that I like as much for the characters/culture.

Iain M Banks' Culture series doesn't impress me at all.
 
LOL

No one commented on the mathematical gobbledygook.

The trouble with just computing the Mean is that the maximum possible score is 5.00 and the lowest is 1.00. That is ridiculous for MILLIONS of different books.

My system has given scores as high as 800.

This is the lowest:

Demon Seed by Dean Koontz - - - - - - - - - - - 1973 2228 3162 4459 1678 569 on: March 27, 2018
G/BRat = 2.399 Xcp3Rat = 0.667 Star3Prd = 1.6
12,096 ratings @ Mean: 3.4

3.4 doesn't sound that bad for a Goodreads rating but I don't recall any lower.

Retraction:

Tumble & Fall by Alexandra Coutts
150 211 330 234 163 on: April 27, 2018 G/BRat = 0.909 Xcp3Rat = 0.604 Star3Prd = 0.55
1,088 ratings @ Mean: 2.95

That must be a bad book.
Despite being a science orientated engineer, I'm not a great one for qantitative analysis of books - I feel there are just too many variables; how, for example, to compare say The Stars My Destination and Brave New World; both classics but there's simply no common ground to score them against each other. Also too many people (myself included) give 5 stars when what we really mean is 5 stars within it's own sub genre. So I'm afraid I always end up far more qualitative in my book analysis! :D
 
Count me among those who loved Shards of Honor, but felt the series went rapidly downhill from there. I just could not buy Miles and I suppose that points to a weakness in myself. --- I did read about 6 books in the series, so that indicates they were far from terrible.
 
Count me among those who loved Shards of Honor, but felt the series went rapidly downhill from there. I just could not buy Miles and I suppose that points to a weakness in myself. --- I did read about 6 books in the series, so that indicates they were far from terrible.
i dont think it’s you. He is a hyperactive little git after all :D
 
Count me among those who loved Shards of Honor, but felt the series went rapidly downhill from there. I just could not buy Miles and I suppose that points to a weakness in myself. --- I did read about 6 books in the series, so that indicates they were far from terrible.
It was Barrayar that hooked me on the series and I regard Warriors Apprentice as a low point. It is not a sciency SF series though it doesn't do anything offensive. I like the way Bujold dealt "scientifically" with the wormhole detective story of Komarr. Any imagined physics phenomenon will have to be dealt with scientifically within the context of the story.
 
Can't leave out Shards of Honor

9852 9178 4468 902 221
on: Nov 28, 2018
G/BRat = 16.946 Xcp3Rat = 2.405
Star3Prd = 40.76
24,621 ratings @ Mean: 4.12

13,079 • 12,809 • 6,350 • 1,379 • 431
on: Aug 31,2022
G/BRat = 14.302. Xcp3Rat = 4.592.
Star3Prd = 65.67
34,048 ratings @ Mean: 4.08

The mean went down a trivial amount in 3+ years but the star3prod went up more than 50%.
I guess 9400 more ratings is OK. Later books in series do get fewer ratings.
 

Back
Top