I rarely post in these monthly reading theads these days - the consequence of not reading much fiction in 2012 and then getting out of the habit of posting here - but I'll resume my practice of avoiding mentioning things like plot, but quoting the opening paragraph of a book.
I've just finished reading the debut novel of Stephanie Saulter,
Gemsigns; the author was on a couple of the panels I attended at BristolCon.
Chapter 0 (at last: software rather than hardware numbering
):
When describing a circle one begins anywhere. Each point precedes and succeeds with no greater or less meaning; the tale they tell remains unvaried. There is neither cause nor consequence, for every moment is both. It is curious the resignation with which we decalre this pattern in human affairs, and the virtue with which we credit it in nature.
.
.
For a first novel, the author has risked doing things that I, as an aspiring writer have tried (though not always successfully) to avoid. Chapter 0 - a prologue by another name - is, essentially, written in third person omniscient. (Long ago, so was mine, until an agent said that this wasn't done these days; I think he was right, and still is.) There are also what could easily be seen as infodumps; but as the plot revolves around the happenings at a conference, and the infodumps were excerpts from papers being presented to it, I wasn't really bothered by this (even though infodumps are also heavily frowned upon). Perhaps less forgivable are the handful of scenes where there is a (small) degree of head-hopping. There are one or two fantasy elements in the story, although it's written as SF. (The setting is a future Earth (22nd century) after the partial collapse of civilisation.)
However, I did enjoy the story**, and it was well constructed, delivering the effects I think the author sought at the times they should have been. And although one of the points of the novel is to introduce us to difference (and the different ways we might react to it), the novel did a good job of getting us to empathise with those who were different. (A good part of this is the result of using a "non-different" character as the main narrator.)
As an aside, I was very much reminded of some of Ken MacLeod books in some of the scenes, at least in terms of including political debates. This is not to say the author is writing from Ken MacLeod's perspective, of course.
Gemsigns is the first book in what I believe to be a trilogy. (The second book is with the publishers.) Even so, the book came to a pretty definite end. There is plenty of scope for the sequels, but the reader isn't left hanging at all.
Anyway, I fully intend reading the next book in the series. (I expect it'll be out in 2014.)
** - Although I write space opera - with all that entails (such as interstellar travel) - I admit to being drawn to biological SF. I was therefore drawn to a novel where the issues are very much played out in the open.