So part of my research pile included David Gemmell's Legend, so I've begun re-reading this.
I read it once, about 20+ years ago, and I remember enjoying it then, except for the ending.
I have to admit I was hesitant to re-read it now:
a) because I remember Gemmell said the writing wasn't very polished,
b) I thought it might be a bit of a cheesy read (I probably originally read it not long after Dragonlance).
What astonishes me about this book is the amount of concentrated detail in it.
For one, the little details of historical realism are superb. Real work has gone into this and most readers might not notice - heck, it just helps enforce the context - but as an aspiring writer I can see just how much attention has given to it. It's a long time since I've read an epic fantasy that does (possibly Robert Jordan's Eye of the World).
Secondly, the use of psychology is superb. I've studied the effects of violence via Rory Miller's books, and Gemmell uses it all here - but very succinctly, and it's all show don't tell. Again, I can see as an aspiring writer how he uses this to build up context and character reactions and it's very well done.
Overall, I'm really surprised - the attention to detail is stunning, and the characters, while not drawn to a great depth, are sketched with enough personality and character to make them individual, memorable, and easy to follow.
I now better understand why David Gemmell is regarded as one of the masters of 'epic fantasy', which is as much an indictment of modern writers in this subgenre and their failure to attend to detail. I'll probably have to look out for more.
I read it once, about 20+ years ago, and I remember enjoying it then, except for the ending.
I have to admit I was hesitant to re-read it now:
a) because I remember Gemmell said the writing wasn't very polished,
b) I thought it might be a bit of a cheesy read (I probably originally read it not long after Dragonlance).
What astonishes me about this book is the amount of concentrated detail in it.
For one, the little details of historical realism are superb. Real work has gone into this and most readers might not notice - heck, it just helps enforce the context - but as an aspiring writer I can see just how much attention has given to it. It's a long time since I've read an epic fantasy that does (possibly Robert Jordan's Eye of the World).
Secondly, the use of psychology is superb. I've studied the effects of violence via Rory Miller's books, and Gemmell uses it all here - but very succinctly, and it's all show don't tell. Again, I can see as an aspiring writer how he uses this to build up context and character reactions and it's very well done.
Overall, I'm really surprised - the attention to detail is stunning, and the characters, while not drawn to a great depth, are sketched with enough personality and character to make them individual, memorable, and easy to follow.
I now better understand why David Gemmell is regarded as one of the masters of 'epic fantasy', which is as much an indictment of modern writers in this subgenre and their failure to attend to detail. I'll probably have to look out for more.