I thought I'd run a commentary on Joe Abercrombie's opening chapter, posted to io9, as it highlights so many things about strong writing - and openings.
I'll link rather than repost, as I wouldn't want to fall foul of any copyright rules:
An Exclusive First Look at Joe Abercrombie's Next Novel, Half a King
However, he already showed tone in the previous paragraph. Why do that here? Two reasons, perhaps:
1) context - we can see immediately this is a pre-industrial society,
2) place - the previous paragraph was a general sense of place - now he's bringing us directly into the scene: the room where the action that follows will happen.
His counter - about finding the lesser evil - demonstrates that Yarvi is in conflict with this situation. He obviously doesn't believe in doing "dark things" at the moment, but he is being told that sometimes you must for the good of everyone - the "greater good".
There is a little more dialogue to establish setting and character - notice how it works in dialogue, rather than the author tell the reader through an introspective infodump? Then we get to:
There's plenty more than follows - we learn about the hand, which explains "half a king" in the opening, plus there's a little humour about Yarvi's great skill at making tea.
And then this warm and cosy world is shattered with strong verbs and portentous imagery:
We already know the character Yarvi lacks confidence and courage - potential for reader empathy and sympathy. We also know he is good with poisons but hates the idea of using them. He has made clear his moral boundaries at this stage - he can not yet accept evil works a greater good. He is also relieved to avoid the responsibilities of rule and leadership.
There is a lot here to set up Yarvi's emotional arc and character development, potential foreshadowing (will he need to use poison to work evil for the greater good - and therefore be in conflict with his moral boundaries?).
And yet, it is a succinct piece.
I'm sure there are members here who might quibble at some of the word choices, or express that this does not sound like a story to their personal taste.
That's not what this post is about.
Reading this piece, and then looking at the WIP I'm editing, and I see fat in the latter I otherwise over looked.
And the character development - wants, needs, potential for conflict - all shown early.
I'm not going to suggest this opening for Half a King is the best piece of writing in the world, but it is a good example of lean and punchy writing that modern markets demand, that shows mood and character, and clearly uses various writing tools to begin to set up a story. Less than a 1,000 words, too.
Discuss.
I'll link rather than repost, as I wouldn't want to fall foul of any copyright rules:
An Exclusive First Look at Joe Abercrombie's Next Novel, Half a King
The story opens with the wind providing a sense of foreboding. And then is immediately modified - this is no "great" king, but "half" a king. Already it invites the reader to ask themselves how someone can only be a half king.There was a harsh gale blowing on the night Yarvi learned he was a king. Or half a king, at least.
It's not just a gale - the wind is named and described. To continue the opening tone, this wind "moans" with a "dead chill". An ominous wind indeed!A seeking wind, the Gettlanders called it, for it found out every chink and keyhole, moaning Mother Sea's dead chill into every dwelling, no matter how high the fires were banked or how close the folk were huddled.
He's still building on the tone - notice all the choice verbs: tore, rattled, taunted, spat, crackled, clawing.It tore at the shutters in the narrow windows of Mother Gundring's chambers and rattled even the iron-bound door in its frame. It taunted the flames in the firepit and they spat and crackled in their anger, casting clawing shadows from the dried herbs hanging, throwing flickering light upon the root that Mother Gundring held up in her knobbled fingers.
However, he already showed tone in the previous paragraph. Why do that here? Two reasons, perhaps:
1) context - we can see immediately this is a pre-industrial society,
2) place - the previous paragraph was a general sense of place - now he's bringing us directly into the scene: the room where the action that follows will happen.
Notice how he jumps straight into dialogue? While he lets us know in the next line that we're seeing this from the perspective of Yarvi, also note what Abercrombie is NOT doing: there is no following infodump about the woman, Yarvi, the people, their history, their current situation, why they are sat here, what they did last Thursday, etc etc etc.'And this?'
Instead of infodumping, Abercrombie is immediately letting the characters describe their conflicts immediately. The above is a good example of this: she is teaching him about use of poisons, and that for his position to come, he must consider doing "dark things".Mother Gundring tossed the root aside. 'Ministers must sometimes reach for dark things.'
'Ministers must find the lesser evil,' said Yarvi.
'And weigh the greater good.
His counter - about finding the lesser evil - demonstrates that Yarvi is in conflict with this situation. He obviously doesn't believe in doing "dark things" at the moment, but he is being told that sometimes you must for the good of everyone - the "greater good".
There is a little more dialogue to establish setting and character - notice how it works in dialogue, rather than the author tell the reader through an introspective infodump? Then we get to:
The character is making clear what they want. The emotional development arc is clearly being set.'And I'll be Prince Yarvi no more.' All he felt at that thought was relief. 'I'll have no family and no birthright.'
Again, more setting up of the character Yarvi.He meant he lacked the courage, but lacked the courage to admit it.
There's plenty more than follows - we learn about the hand, which explains "half a king" in the opening, plus there's a little humour about Yarvi's great skill at making tea.
And then this warm and cosy world is shattered with strong verbs and portentous imagery:
And then the ending:The door banged wide and that seeking wind tore through the chamber. The flames in the firepit jumped as Yarvi did, dancing distorted in the hundred hundred jars and bottles on the shelves. A figure blundered up the steps, setting the bunches of plants swinging like hanged men behind him.
So what have we learned so far? Quite a lot, really.'What is it?' croaked Yarvi, his throat tight with fear.
His uncle dropped to his knees, hands on the greasy straw. He bowed his head, and spoke two words, low and raw.
'My king.'
And Yarvi knew his father and brother were dead.
We already know the character Yarvi lacks confidence and courage - potential for reader empathy and sympathy. We also know he is good with poisons but hates the idea of using them. He has made clear his moral boundaries at this stage - he can not yet accept evil works a greater good. He is also relieved to avoid the responsibilities of rule and leadership.
There is a lot here to set up Yarvi's emotional arc and character development, potential foreshadowing (will he need to use poison to work evil for the greater good - and therefore be in conflict with his moral boundaries?).
And yet, it is a succinct piece.
I'm sure there are members here who might quibble at some of the word choices, or express that this does not sound like a story to their personal taste.
That's not what this post is about.
Reading this piece, and then looking at the WIP I'm editing, and I see fat in the latter I otherwise over looked.
And the character development - wants, needs, potential for conflict - all shown early.
I'm not going to suggest this opening for Half a King is the best piece of writing in the world, but it is a good example of lean and punchy writing that modern markets demand, that shows mood and character, and clearly uses various writing tools to begin to set up a story. Less than a 1,000 words, too.
Discuss.