Mediaeval knights fighting snails!

Brian G Turner

Fantasist & Futurist
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2002
Messages
26,686
Location
UK
Yes. Knights fighting snails, from mediaeval manuscripts.

The mind boggles as to why.

1511325_10201118284711515_1663683681_n.jpg


10_14_2013_snail-2-e1381762406580.jpg


Snail7.jpg


knight+fighting+snail.jpg


10_14_2013_snails.jpg


And if you can't fight them, pray to them:

1524964_10151880894092078_950309211_n.jpg
 
How odd.

Depending on how old those manuscripts are, perhaps it was a reaction to the introduction of firearms (and the... er... slugs** they fired...).



:rolleyes::eek::)


** - And some of the scribes obviously imagined larger calibre weapons, ones that could fire shells....
 
Scribes really let their imaginations go wild when drawing (and painting) the little pictures around the margins in illuminated manuscripts. You can find a number of weird and grotesque things, also some that are whimsical and charming. I always love the faces on the little people.

But the snails? Very, very odd that those scenes should turn up in so many manuscripts!
 
Nobody mentioned Monty Python yet?

Interestingly, the Irish word for snail, snake and serpent is the same* (peist -- although google translate is currently contradicting my teachers). Maybe the instructions were to illustrate a knight fighting a snake?



* the same is true of the Irish words for rat and Frenchman, except for capitalisation
 
I don't know...if I saw snails that size, I might pick up a bladed weapon--or a holy hand grenade (there you go, alc ;))--to defend myself. And the one in the first picture looks aggressive.

I notice two of the knights have face-shaped shields and, more alarmingly, one of them has the legs and tail of a lion(?). Evidence of mead consumption, and ergot-contaminated bread, perhaps? :p
 
I do wonder if this was an illustrators joke.

Sometimes I understand if a client didnt pay in time or up front (or just for the hell of it) the illustrators added little jokes at their expense. The delights of which I noticed on a document with a chap having a number two off the side of a ship in the margins of an ancient map.... toilet humour clearly isnt anything new!
 
Haha, One of my seminar leaders loves the snail illustrations - he puts a new one on his handout every week, and apologises every week for doing so. They really are amazing.
 
Haha, One of my seminar leaders loves the snail illustrations - he puts a new one on his handout every week, and apologises every week for doing so.
Has his interest in them extended to finding out what they're about?
 
Has his interest in them extended to finding out what they're about?

I've done a bit of googling, and it does seem to be a genuine mystery. One theory is that the snail represents sloth, a sin. But it could also be just an absurd one-off joke by some medieval Terry Gilliam that then became fashionable amongst illuminators. I guess the snail, with its "armour", might have seemed an appropriate comical opponent for a knight.
 
I reckon the third guy should worry more about the squirrel - it looks like it's plotting something to me. Of course he should also maybe worry about the belt (or snake?) that he's got tangled around his sword.
 
--or a holy hand grenade (there you go, alc ;))

Didst thou count to three before launching? Not one, not two, unless thou proceedeth to the number three. Five's right out, correct?

Also, how were the fruit bats, and the breakfast cereals, and the sloths, etc.?

Seriously though...that was weird. Not that snails are scary or anything, but I suppose if they were that big, I too would pick up a long bladed weapon :)
 
I reckon the third guy should worry more about the squirrel - it looks like it's plotting something to me. Of course he should also maybe worry about the belt (or snake?) that he's got tangled around his sword.

His hand is on the blade too. I'd be more worried about THAT! How come he doesn't have a thought bubble--"Ouch, this hurts, maybe I should keep my hand off of the blade." :D
 
Five's right out, correct?
Verily, it is. :D
Brilliant, Monsterchic! ;)

His hand is on the blade too. I'd be more worried about THAT! How come he doesn't have a thought bubble--"Ouch, this hurts, maybe I should keep my hand off of the blade." :D
I've seen some of the fighting manuals, and holding/guiding the blade (with hand or arm) was, sometimes, a part of the fighting technique. Broadswords were not always razor sharp. and didn't need to be - much of the damage was caused by the weight of the weapon.
 
I've seen some of the fighting manuals, and holding/guiding the blade (with hand or arm) was, sometimes, a part of the fighting technique. Broadswords were not always razor sharp. and didn't need to be - much of the damage was caused by the weight of the weapon.

That makes a lot of sense, actually. Just crush your enemies, slam them! Looks like my topic of research for the day is fighting techniques and swords :)
 

Similar threads


Back
Top