True Detective

I take it you've seen the whole 8 episodes? I've seen the first two here and am enjoying it. BUT, while the characterisation and mood is excellent (it's like True Blood without vampires), I have to say the story is progressing very, very slowly and is going to have to speed up a little to hold my interest.
 
I've lined it up to watch when I finished Adventure Time (yeah, I know, but I like to finish something when I've started it!) - everything I've heard about it is positive.

One of the comparisons I've seen is with NBC's Hannibal, being that the two are similar (though I'm not sure if it's because they are both similar, are because they just both have grisly murders), but where Hannibal is grounded in reality, True Detective instead takes the supernatural route.
 
alchemist said:
I take it you've seen the whole 8 episodes? I've seen the first two here and am enjoying it. BUT, while the characterisation and mood is excellent (it's like True Blood without vampires), I have to say the story is progressing very, very slowly and is going to have to speed up a little to hold my interest.
Click to expand...

I've seen episodes 1-7. The finale airs on Sunday.

It is definitely slow--it has the feel of a European art film. For me that's a huge plus, as I've never seen a TV show that has such artistic ambitions. And the writing is just superb. But I'm also completely captivated.
 
Episode 2 just aired here this week and it looks promising. It has similarities to Hannibal and Low Winter Sun. It moves at a snail's pace, but this is ok. Like reading a big, immersive novel the characters are giving room to breathe and grow. Sort of like a nice red :)
 
Maybe some spoilers in the below? Not sure, don't think so but you've been warned!


The finale has pissed off alot of people. I think the entire point of the show is the characters and how they change over the 1995-2012 period. The finale shows that best. I think the plot about the murders is secondary to that. The finale leaves alot of stuff open (which i won't go into) but as one character states 'Thats real life - nothing's neat." and that is why i like this show so much. It felt like i was watching a real invesigation, watching real people suffer and endure. Episode 4 finale = amazing scene. The finale reveal = decent. Overall though, if you are looking for it to be tied off neatly you won't be happy.
 
barrett1987 said:
Maybe some spoilers in the below? Not sure, don't think so but you've been warned!


The finale has pissed off alot of people. I think the entire point of the show is the characters and how they change over the 1995-2012 period. The finale shows that best. I think the plot about the murders is secondary to that. The finale leaves alot of stuff open (which i won't go into) but as one character states 'Thats real life - nothing's neat." and that is why i like this show so much. It felt like i was watching a real invesigation, watching real people suffer and endure. Episode 4 finale = amazing scene. The finale reveal = decent. Overall though, if you are looking for it to be tied off neatly you won't be happy.
Click to expand...

I think that a major problem for some viewers is that this show is fundamentally art house--the point isn't the plot, but the atmosphere, characterization and exploration of human psychology. A lot of people are expecting it to be like Game of Thrones, and it's just not that kind of show. It's operating on a higher level.
 
Tour-de-force slow-burner with fatalistic nihilism, brute savagery, insanity, fine dynamics, hard characterisations and a deft cinematic touch in places.

Yes, I enjoyed it immensely. Echoes of The Following and Life but bleaker than both. Wonderful.

Surprised it garnered such high public acclaim, but the interest sent The King in Yellow into the Amazon bestseller lists, which I cannot fault one whit. :)
 
I've watched the first three and it is boring the backside off me in a big way. Really, really not getting the big deal. Maybe I've just watched too many detective shows but at present I'm finding it almost cliche with the characters even the way the body was arranged as been done in a similar vein in stories before.
 
I'd say that if it hasn't got you by the end of the first episode, walk away.

It's the rule I apply to all series. Too much media, too little time. It either works for you, or it doesn't.
 
barrett1987 said:
Maybe some spoilers in the below? Not sure, don't think so but you've been warned!


The finale has pissed off alot of people. I think the entire point of the show is the characters and how they change over the 1995-2012 period. The finale shows that best. I think the plot about the murders is secondary to that. The finale leaves alot of stuff open (which i won't go into) but as one character states 'Thats real life - nothing's neat." and that is why i like this show so much. It felt like i was watching a real invesigation, watching real people suffer and endure. Episode 4 finale = amazing scene. The finale reveal = decent. Overall though, if you are looking for it to be tied off neatly you won't be happy.
Click to expand...

Correct -- episode 4 was fantastic; far more gripping than those that came before. I'm looking forward to the last two more now.
 
Just finished watching the series. Overall I thought it was fantastic. The acting was out of the top drawer, the atmosphere cloying, oppressive and menacing, a great piece of filming in general.

The only real criticism (and it is a big one) was that ending felt kind of rushed after the build up. Although on reflection it was always going to be difficult to end this on the right note.
 
Very , very good show. Also very slow; some tv series would fit it all into 2 hour long episodes. A real hark back to the golden era of tv when shows were much slower paced, and far more time was spent on characterisation than just getting from A to B.

I believe there's another series in the offering but with entirely different characters. I think that was the right way to playit; a series of 'adventures' for the two cops just wouldn't ring true.
 
True Detective is back on form for season 3 after the season 2 train wreck. An impressive performance from Mahershala Ali in the first two episodes. Some (superficial) similarities to season 1, but also a lot of red herrings I am sure. I have missed thinking about a series like this from week to week, slowly unraveling its mystery, instead of binging on the latest Netflix & Amazon bloat.
 
Really enjoyed the first episode. I loved the the first season and was one of the few that also liked the 2nd season. This one has more of a vibe akin to the first season which should make for compelling viewing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T HPL in True Detective H P Lovecraft 4
T 5 Predictions from Old Sci-Fi Movies About the 21st Century That Actually Came True Science & Nature 1
Astro Pen First true short story, around 7500 words Writing Discussion 6
Fishbowl Helmet Interesting article on the flaws of True Detective Season 2... Writing Discussion 8
svalbard True Detective Season 2 General TV Discussion 13

Similar threads


Back
Top