Extollager
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2010
- Messages
- 9,241
I just finished this thriller and wondered if anyone wanted to talk about it. I've never read anything that was so hard-science in a science fiction context. So far as I could tell, the engineering stuff was plausible. The psychological side seemed taken for granted -- that, basically, the astronaut marooned on Mars for over an earth year would grit his teeth, keep busy, watch old TV recordings for recreation, etc. Similarly I had doubts about the consequences for the body of what I understand to be the prolonged exposure to cosmic rays during a voyage to Mars, etc. I wasn't too troubled by these things because I took the book to be, in intention, a thought experiment about how the engineering issues might play out in such a scenario -- coupled with the intention of writing a thriller. For me, then, the book was a real change of pace, and a success. I've been attracted to the idea of what Geoff Ryman calls "mundane" science fiction, and surely this was a spot-on example.
By the way, I owe it to the Wall Street Journal that I learned about this book, if I'm not mistaken.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304558804579375161461671196
Some of y'all may have gut reactions against anything "Wall Street," but I like the Journal's weekly book reviews a lot. I'd rate their book section far above that of the New York Times, not that that is saying much. Tolkienists will be interested in the fact that Tom Shippey reviews for them quite often. He reviewed The Martian for them:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304428004579351000913706472