While I understand why some people might think, "No, I would NOT DO THAT. Don't TELL ME WHAT I AM DOING," one has to realize that the 2nd person is NOT the narrator telling YOU what YOU are doing. It has the potential to be a very intimate POV. With 1st person, you are super close to a character. You are in his/her head.
In 2nd person, you're not only IN the character's head, but you are invited along for the ride--an opportunity to "walk a mile in this person's shoes." To feel what the character is feeling. Not just being "talked to" by a character who has something to say. It's a merging of storyteller and storytold.
I think what tends to turn people off the post is that it can be a very in-your-face POV. It can also be very conversational.
Again, I love a good 2nd person POV. But I need it to be done well. And I've seen it done well quite often.
Teaching creative writing, I always ask my students to write in 2nd person, just to get a feel for it. A very simple exercise is to create a "How To" list in 2nd person.
Junot Diaz's "How to Date a Brown Girl," is written in 2nd person directive. A great example of this. [
LINK ]
I suppose people can keep pushing up against the 2nd person, but it seems to me that you're only limiting yourself--especially in regard to how language and prose works and what effect this sort of approach can have on your own writing. I've had students open up completely after trying non-traditional POVs: 2nd person, 1st person plural, etc.
Honestly? The "I don't like being told what to do" reaction is one that comes from not understanding the POV and how it operates.
Again, if done poorly, you will lose the effect altogether and it will come across as a gimmick. When done well? Even a semi-educated reader will "get" what the author is trying to accomplish.