SirSamuelVimes
Well-Known Member
I read Gardens of the Moon, and absolutely loved it! Now I'm reading Deadhouse Gates, and am finding it a bit dry in comparison. The scope has narrowed severely, and the broad scope was one of the main things I enjoyed about the first novel. I also don't find most of the characters as compelling, as the characters in the first novel. For the most part the only characters I enjoy are the ones that carried over from the first novel.
My question is does Deadhouse Gates become the norm for his writing, or does it revert back to being more like Gardens of the Moon?
Also, am I the only one who noticed the difference between the two novels?
My question is does Deadhouse Gates become the norm for his writing, or does it revert back to being more like Gardens of the Moon?
Also, am I the only one who noticed the difference between the two novels?