anthorn
Well-Known Member
Okay, so I'm currently re-re-re-re-re-writing an idea I had when I realised that the storyline that introduced the main character should really be happening at a much later date in the story. I.E. Another book. But it's like a domino effect isn't it when you consider how much is changed by this one character. Surprisingly though, this character doesn't get effected by the change as much as the other character. I decided he would become a caravan guard, thus giving him a reason to know how to wield a sword or revolver.
I'm trying to get the reasoning down on other characters. Which sounds more realistic to you. Two sisters are sent to a school to train/learn/etc. When they reach 14-16 they head off to do apprenticeships in another city, but are attacked along the way. One is kidnapped, the eldest of the two escapes. What sounds better: Eldest returns home to parents, troubled by guilt and dreams, lives her life, becomes part of her father's company. OR.
Ashamed, returns to nearby city, lives by trade she learned at school, plagued by dreams, writes home pretending things are fine then joins an army travelling to war when she realises her father is coming to city.
Which is more plausible.
I'm trying to get the reasoning down on other characters. Which sounds more realistic to you. Two sisters are sent to a school to train/learn/etc. When they reach 14-16 they head off to do apprenticeships in another city, but are attacked along the way. One is kidnapped, the eldest of the two escapes. What sounds better: Eldest returns home to parents, troubled by guilt and dreams, lives her life, becomes part of her father's company. OR.
Ashamed, returns to nearby city, lives by trade she learned at school, plagued by dreams, writes home pretending things are fine then joins an army travelling to war when she realises her father is coming to city.
Which is more plausible.