The next 30 years.

Harpo

Getting away with it
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Messages
3,818
Location
The edge of the world. Yes, really.
Corporate armies, drone terrorism, laser weapons







Large multinational corporations could develop their own highly capable security forces. Criminals and terrorists will have access to increasingly cheap unmanned drones and space satellites. Sophisticated environmental warfare will spread plant and human diseases by insects.
These are among an array of dire warnings spelt out in a study by a Ministry of Defence thinktank exploring potential threats to security that might emerge by the middle of the century.
The study, Global Strategic Trends – Out to 2045, contains fresh warnings about the effects of climate change, the growth of sprawling urban centres, and pressure on natural resources, notably water. It paints a picture of a world in which the authority of states diminishes in the face of powerful private multinational companies, and national loyalties are weakened by increasing migration.
Rear Admiral John Kingwell, director of the MoD's Concepts and Doctrine Centre, which carried out the study, said it did not seek to predict the future and did not reflect official government policy. However, he said it described plausible outcomes on the basis of rigorous analysis of existing trends.
"The pace and breadth of technological advancements will change our perception of our role in the workplace, reveal new opportunities for health advances, and facilitate the deepening of global communications," he said.
"But as access to technology increases, we will face new risks to our security both at home and abroad. In the west in particular, a rise of individualism and … a growing sense of disconnection from long-established governing structures will challenge traditional systems."
The study says that by 2045:
• The world population could reach 10.4 billion, compared with about 7.2 billion at present.
• More than 70% of the population is likely to live in urban areas.
• 3.9 billion people are likely to suffer water shortages.
• Driverless transport is likely to be widespread.
• Unmanned systems are increasingly likely to replace people in the workplace, leading to mass unemployment and social unrest.
• Robots are likely to change the face of warfare, but "military decision-making is likely to remain the remit of humans for ethical reasons, at least in western countries".
• Individuals may define themselves less by their nationality, with growing migration and stronger links to virtual communities.
• Chinese defence expenditure it likely to rival that of the US, but Russia's will not match that of China, the US or India.
The study says the influence of non-state actors such as multinational corporations is likely to increase at the expense of nation states, and private companies may develop "highly capable security forces".
Cheaper and more sophisticated drones will mean criminal and terrorist groups are likely to find it easier to "gain, hold and use unmanned capabilities".
Internal terrorist threats are likely to continue in the Middle East and north Africa, while the expansion of alternative currencies may make it easier for criminals and terrorist groups to transfer funds between national jurisdictions, the study says.
However, it says the pressure of globalisation will make it more difficult for individual countries to act unilaterally. That could reduce conflicts between states.
Future weapons are likely to include long-range lasers capable of producing a beam of electromagnetic energy or atomic radiation that can destroy equipment and infrastructure or cause non-lethal damage to human targets, the report says.
"As the cost of sequencing an individual's DNA continues to fall, targeting an individual using their DNA may be possible by 2045," the study adds. "We could also see sophisticated environmental warfare capable of spreading plant and human disease by insects or insect-machine hybrids. Crops and cattle could be destroyed, as well as people being incapacitated or killed."
By 2020, more than 500 small satellites, sometimes called cubesats, will join the 1,000 already operating in orbit around the planet, according to the report. They will be increasingly vulnerable to attack – and collision.
By 2045 or earlier, it says, "criminal organisations could secure payload space on rockets operated by private companies – this would allow them to launch their own surveillance satellites, potentially threatening individual and corporate privacy".
 
The ministry of defense has sponsored an extensive, multimillion pound, study into future threats.
Top scientists have watched Continuum.

Shock horror.
 
The Future that we end up with , seldom if ever, resembles projections that we make.
 
Very interesting, and this also demonstrates that there's far more intelligence and imagination among civil servants, and even the military, than among elected politicians.
The USA for one is very interested in using weather and earthquakes as weapons. Genetic weapons, that would permanently damage the DNA of whole ethnic groups, are another possibility- they'd be of more use to racially homogenous countries such as Japan and China, than to multiracial countries like UK or USA. THeir use would not be easily detectable, especially if they caused a build-up of chronic disabling illness rather than mass death. This would actually be preferred by military planners. From their perspective, if you kill a man you reduce enemy strength by one, but if you disable him you reduce by two- him and the person who will now have to look after him.
 
Ah well that's all right then.

As long as we can be sure that no matter who we vote for, there will always be someone to create racially targetted genetic viruses and who knows how best to use them (presumably a similar someone is targeting our ethnic group too), then we can all sleep easier in our beds.
 
The Future that we end up with , seldom if ever, resembles projections that we make.


I don't know what you mean..

/me dons silver all in one and gets into flying car. It is 2014 after all...
 
Well we know now don't we. Orwell was right, 100% right. The two minutes hate, Emmanuel Goldstein, the war in Eurasia, total surveillance, controlled media, personal betrayal, arrests, 'newspeak' - everything!
 
Honestly, I'm not sure how the next 5 years will go, let alone 20-30. Orwell got a lot right, but not necessarily in the way he envisaged. Nineteen Eighty Four portrayed states controlled by governments that were ruthlessly effective; we know now that they are anything but.

In my opinion, there are a couple of significant forks in the road ahead. We will see whether or not AI will grow exponentially, or be kept in check; almost certainly the former.

We will also witness significant evironmental changes that will affect populations directly, rather than just seeing melting ice caps on the tv. At that point governments will have no option but to do something about it. Whether we will be able to pull back from the brink will determine the fate of our species. Why not do something about it now, when it's still reversible? This is something that will be discussed by historians long after we have gone.
 
Providing that peaceful existence over declared regions with multiple ruling powers, is the goal and not all out warfare, governments will expand to include an industrial component which will be responsible for supplying social and infrastructure obligations. Occasional bouts of controlled warfare will be allowed in areas away from big population centers. For a growing number of people, it seems like the weather is more often a threat than some government action. Instead of doing something to reverse the current flow it might be easier for governments to build huge weatherproof bunker style conapts for most people to live in. Its far easier to provide adequate shelter than it is to fix the problem. Medicine is already forming an impressive industrial structure that will fit right in with keeping people in line. With 500,000 low orbit satellites roaming the skies, that could easily control huge fleets of remotely controlled self driving ground vehicles that would be used as public transport. When in dense traffic areas the vehicles line up and are controlled to minimize long lines of traffic. When in less dense traffic situations they operate as individual vehicles. The vehicles are given locations to go to, they are not personally driven. Flying vehicles would be present, also remotely controlled self driving. They would be small, which would be 10 x 20 feet, and being battery powered they couldn't go for extended trips. Food would be increasingly manufactured to feed more people with less resources. Much of today's food is already manufactured using ingredients that are there to maintain a realistic artificial look. AI assisted computers will be used to make everything, from planning to execution, run like clockwork. By controlling where people live, how they get around, what they eat, medical care, and where they work, pretty much offers a highly controlled environment.
 
if you disable him you reduce by two- him and the person who will now have to look after him.

This is specifically illegal under the Geneva Convention and one of the reasons that we don't have laser guns: they tend to blind rather than kill outright.

Orwell got a lot right, but not necessarily in the way he envisaged.

Psychologically, 1984 is absolutely correct, but physically it isn't (it's not meant to be). The 1984 world is basically a mixture of Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany, set in bombed-out London. Technology appears to be no better than the 1950s. Our own world is closer to William Gibson's Sprawl novels with more fascists and less personal freedom, especially so far as the matrix/internet is concerned. Of course as soon as some politician or oligarch doesn't like having to obey the law these days, they squeal about how it's stolen their freedom and "it's just like 1984". It's weird to see Orwell quoted by people who would happily have had him killed.
 
Last edited:
I sometimes wonder if we are close to the Great Filter - the point where an intelligent civilisation hits catastrophe and collapses. Certainly we are bordering on major changes. Last weeks New Scientist talked of collapsing ocean ecosystems due to over heating, there is the problem of food production due to desertification in Africa and deforested land leeching nutrients.

On the positive side we may well finally discover life on other planets/moons. Not silver suited aliens but microbes and bacteria
 
It might be easier to look at the world as a continual work in progress, composed of bunches of disorganized organizations which form temporary bonds, hold power, shape practices, build civilizations. Over time, the mantle of power is continually passed on, voluntarily or not, to another group, waiting for it or not. It is not one single stream but parallel streams that are only sometimes peaking and falling at the same time.

Sourcing energy is probably the most important thing that will happen in the next 30 years. The production of food, which is an energy source, is nearing a point where we will be able to make it from scratch. Many substances that once only had a natural living source now have synthetic sources. At this time most of items made are raw ingredients which are used to compliment foods but can't be eaten as food by themselves.

People have been toying with the prospect of making food from crude oil for 60 years now. That idea pretty much went out the window when a barrel of oil went from a few dollars a barrel to double digits. The natural gas industry has shown that it would be possible to obtain vast amounts of natural gas for a relatively low price. We are continually making advances in increasing the efficiency of generating electricity from natural energy sources. At the same time the magnetism industry is growing by leaps and bounds. The study of electric fields has gone lightyears past the original static electricity experiments. Shifting to electric powered devices over the next 30 years is going to reduce the need for petro fuels as a mechanical energy source. The petro industry has already shifted gears to counteract a possible decrease for petro fuels by boosting plastic production.

We are already producing electricity from garbage. Forget about soylent green, making food from garbage is the only intelligent way to step up food production without relying on natural sources. The changing environment, which includes natural and sociological forces is not making it easier to rely on naturally occurring food products. The naturally occurring food sources produce garbage which gets recycled back into the production of food. A resource that can be replenished naturally over time is a renewable resource and the way things are, garbage in general and plastic waste are renewable resources. There is no lack of garbage and plastic waste and it is increasing as time goes on. The way it is being handled amounts to sliding it under the carpet which has resulted in a very uneven carpeted landscape.

The landscape is shifting, the US Army has hired a research firm to find a way to change plastic waste into oil which is then turned into protein powder, nutritional supplements, and lubricants by microbes. The project is called BioPROTEIN, which stands for Biological Plastic Reuse by Olefin and Ester Transforming Engineered Isolates and Natural Consortia. As envisioned, the process has two basic parts, the first part converts waste plastic into compounds that look like oil using heat and a reactor, which can deconstruct polymer chains. This creates pyrolysis oil which can't be mixed with standard petroleum oil. The second part uses the oil-like compound to feed to a community of oil-eating bacteria to get various products produced.

Bacteria are natural nano machines which can be programed to process materials into more suitable materials. At this time, they can either transform hazardous materials into non hazardous materials or produce useful materials from "clean" materials, they can't do both. While bacteria hasn't been created yet that will do everything that is needed in the time span envisioned, the genetic engineering industry, once best described in science fiction stories, is also growing by leaps and bounds. Garbage to food is one example where the decisions and the materials used are both part of the same solution. This could change a situation of diminishing returns into a physically self sustaining situation. The sociological outcome might not be so glamorous.
 
I sometimes wonder if we are close to the Great Filter - the point where an intelligent civilisation hits catastrophe and collapses. Certainly we are bordering on major changes. Last weeks New Scientist talked of collapsing ocean ecosystems due to over heating, there is the problem of food production due to desertification in Africa and deforested land leeching nutrients.

On the positive side we may well finally discover life on other planets/moons. Not silver suited aliens but microbes and bacteria
I'm not even sometimes wondering about this anymore. I just feel that I'm in a never ending Don't Look Up. We have about 25 years left of fun, perhaps... and then it's over to the insects this time I reckon. Or the birds. The magpies in my garden seem able to adapt to anything.
 
It might be easier to look at the world as a continual work in progress, composed of bunches of disorganized organizations which form temporary bonds, hold power, shape practices, build civilizations. Over time, the mantle of power is continually passed on, voluntarily or not, to another group, waiting for it or not. It is not one single stream but parallel streams that are only sometimes peaking and falling at the same time.

Sourcing energy is probably the most important thing that will happen in the next 30 years. The production of food, which is an energy source, is nearing a point where we will be able to make it from scratch. Many substances that once only had a natural living source now have synthetic sources. At this time most of items made are raw ingredients which are used to compliment foods but can't be eaten as food by themselves.

People have been toying with the prospect of making food from crude oil for 60 years now. That idea pretty much went out the window when a barrel of oil went from a few dollars a barrel to double digits. The natural gas industry has shown that it would be possible to obtain vast amounts of natural gas for a relatively low price. We are continually making advances in increasing the efficiency of generating electricity from natural energy sources. At the same time the magnetism industry is growing by leaps and bounds. The study of electric fields has gone lightyears past the original static electricity experiments. Shifting to electric powered devices over the next 30 years is going to reduce the need for petro fuels as a mechanical energy source. The petro industry has already shifted gears to counteract a possible decrease for petro fuels by boosting plastic production.

We are already producing electricity from garbage. Forget about soylent green, making food from garbage is the only intelligent way to step up food production without relying on natural sources. The changing environment, which includes natural and sociological forces is not making it easier to rely on naturally occurring food products. The naturally occurring food sources produce garbage which gets recycled back into the production of food. A resource that can be replenished naturally over time is a renewable resource and the way things are, garbage in general and plastic waste are renewable resources. There is no lack of garbage and plastic waste and it is increasing as time goes on. The way it is being handled amounts to sliding it under the carpet which has resulted in a very uneven carpeted landscape.

The landscape is shifting, the US Army has hired a research firm to find a way to change plastic waste into oil which is then turned into protein powder, nutritional supplements, and lubricants by microbes. The project is called BioPROTEIN, which stands for Biological Plastic Reuse by Olefin and Ester Transforming Engineered Isolates and Natural Consortia. As envisioned, the process has two basic parts, the first part converts waste plastic into compounds that look like oil using heat and a reactor, which can deconstruct polymer chains. This creates pyrolysis oil which can't be mixed with standard petroleum oil. The second part uses the oil-like compound to feed to a community of oil-eating bacteria to get various products produced.

Bacteria are natural nano machines which can be programed to process materials into more suitable materials. At this time, they can either transform hazardous materials into non hazardous materials or produce useful materials from "clean" materials, they can't do both. While bacteria hasn't been created yet that will do everything that is needed in the time span envisioned, the genetic engineering industry, once best described in science fiction stories, is also growing by leaps and bounds. Garbage to food is one example where the decisions and the materials used are both part of the same solution. This could change a situation of diminishing returns into a physically self sustaining situation. The sociological outcome might not be so glamorous.
Some good ideas there and it is nice to have some positive thoughts. I see it as being more efficient in how we use our resouces though how it scales up remains to be seen.
 
I'm not even sometimes wondering about this anymore. I just feel that I'm in a never ending Don't Look Up. We have about 25 years left of fun, perhaps... and then it's over to the insects this time I reckon. Or the birds. The magpies in my garden seem able to adapt to anything.


Ecosystems take millenia to build up and are resiliant - but not invulnerable. Once they are gone, they are gone forever.

It's crazy that almost as soon as we have become aware of them, we are knowlingly destroying them.

Even for those who deny the impacts of climate change (are there still any?) everyone must realise that we cannot go on doing what we are doing and not have any consequences.

As I've mentioned elsewhere, pictures of melting glaciers and experiencing extreme weather won't change anything. It will only be when something that significantly impacts people's lives happens that we will see governments be forced into dealing with climate change. But by that stage it will be more about mitigation and delaying the inevitable than it will be about repairing what we have destroyed.
 
It will only be when something that significantly impacts people's lives happens that we will see governments be forced into dealing with climate change.
What I find strange is that while insurance costs may have risen on coastal properties, the actual house prices have still risen. This is true even where the number of higher category hurricanes per year has increased, as well as for those experiencing flooding more often. It doesn't seem to figure in government plans for future infrastructure or house building either. Everything seems to be continuing as if nothing is changing.
 
What I find strange is that while insurance costs may have risen on coastal properties, the actual house prices have still risen. This is true even where the number of higher category hurricanes per year has increased, as well as for those experiencing flooding more often. It doesn't seem to figure in government plans for future infrastructure or house building either. Everything seems to be continuing as if nothing is changing.

I think the enormity of the change is beyond most of our comprehensions.
 
What I find strange is that while insurance costs may have risen on coastal properties, the actual house prices have still risen. This is true even where the number of higher category hurricanes per year has increased, as well as for those experiencing flooding more often. It doesn't seem to figure in government plans for future infrastructure or house building either. Everything seems to be continuing as if nothing is changing.
This is basically it. We live in our houses with our lights and supermarket food and none of us can comprehend that changing - including me. But it will, I believe.

Done wonders for the oul anxiety though cos what’s the point of worrying about the small things?
 

Similar threads


Back
Top