A slight loss of privilege isn't an attack...

Fishbowl Helmet

Ask the next question...
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
954
Great article over here on diversity in media. Makes a damned good point that, unfortunately, the people who need to see it most will likely simply ignore or dismiss.

Basically, it's not pandering to women, it's just not pandering to straight white men. There's a big difference. A slight loss of privilege isn't an attack, yet the privileged are behaving as if it were.

This is also one of the big reasons why I'm so tetchy about people trying to ignore Mary Shelley as the creator of science fiction. Sorry boys, she did create the genre you're so hot after. What's more, she was a radical feminist raised by radical feminists, she lived in 'sin' with Lord Byron who was an atheist, and so many other tidbits that make the spoiled man-children rankle.

Summed up in a nice little post over here.
 
Interesting related fact: the first superhero [non-mythological], the Scarlet Pimpernel, was created by Emma Orczy.

I find it a bit odd when on Twitter I see tweets about 'the best non-white male author' you've read recently, or similar. Trying to get the old writing shindig going, and being immediately discounted because of skin colour/gender is not a splendid notion.

It's important there's a level playing field, and that cuts both ways (cf male romance writers adopting female pseudonyms).
 
To my fellow straight white guys, let me say this: You have been pandered to for your entire life. Nearly every piece of media you have ever consumed, from comics books to TV to cartoons, has been tailored made with you in mind as its primary audience.

Absolutely bloody true.

But:

The main problem with this sentiment is that the guys with this mindset would honestly rather believe that poor, innocent developers or writers were forced to include women, LGBTQ+characters, or people of color in their work to please a cabal of slavering SJWs, than to believe that creators honestly want to tell those stories, or appeal to someone who isn’t them.

I don't read comics these days, but the examples I've seen reported by the media never strike me as driven by genuine artistic vision and passion - just lame attempts at marketing through controversy through a process that is morally no better than black-facing.

I read comics during the highs of the late 1980's, when writers such as Neil Gaiman (Sandman), Jamie Delano (Hellblazer) and Grant Morrison (Doom Patrol), explored non-normative sexuality in sensitive and intelligent ways. Alan Moore and Frank Miller pushed boundaries so hard they invented the "graphic novel" as a genre in itself. Even 2000AD dared to challenge some of its own characters between progs 650-699 - not least with Judge Dredd and his realisation that he was a fascist in a fascist system, and Dave Gibbon's intense anti-war imagining of Rogue Trooper.

Then the comics industry died.

I've struggled to find anything sincere about it since. Just attempt after desperate attempt to cry out for attention.

2 opinionated c.
 
This is also one of the big reasons why I'm so tetchy about people trying to ignore Mary Shelley as the creator of science fiction. Sorry boys, she did create the genre you're so hot after. What's more, she was a radical feminist raised by radical feminists, she lived in 'sin' with Lord Byron who was an atheist, and so many other tidbits that make the spoiled man-children rankle.

Being ignorant of something is not the same as trying to ignore it. I doubt most people who have read Frankenstein even regard it as science fiction.

To my fellow straight white guys, let me say this: You have been pandered to for your entire life. Nearly every piece of media you have ever consumed, from comics books to TV to cartoons, has been tailored made with you in mind as its primary audience.

That's true of nerd pop culture, but not pop culture as a whole. And this may stun a lot of digital native Millennials, but nerd culture is not the whole of pop culture.

Television skews heavily female in viewership. Most of the most popular shows on TV, such as Modern Family, Scandal, and Grey's Anatomy (which in its second decade still pulls in more viewers than the Walking Dead) are aimed at largely female audiences. As are the NCIS series, and most reality TV shows, including staples of TV like cooking and home improvement shows.

Novels are a predominately female medium, with novel purchases by women outstripping those by men 2:1. Membership in book clubs is 95 per cent female. Romance, the single most popular genre, has over 95 per cent female readership. Mystery is heavily female in readership. Historical fiction readers are mostly women. YA is dominated by female readers. SF & F are the only predominantly male genres left, and I suspect Fantasy won't be that way much longer. No doubt the identity politics movement will then turn its attention to Romance, Mystery, and YA in an effort to address those genres' egregious and shameful gender imbalances ;).

Pop music is far from a straight white guy medium either. Bros hardly make up the core audience of Taylor Swift, Beyonce, Maroon 5, or Pink. The Beatles didn't become the biggest act in pop culture history because of the music nerds who listened to Sgt. Pepper over and over again, but because of tens of millions of teenaged girls buying their records.

Movies in the last 10 years: Yes, in the era of superhero blockbusters young men are the core audience. And yes, comics too. But it's a reach to call comics themselves 'pop culture' when it's such a tiny industry. It's also worth noting those two mediums are aimed mostly at the under 35 crowd. I anxiously await the passionate online geek movement to make pop culture more representative of the wider public in terms of age. Will we see a day when a third of superheroes are depicted as over 50, or when videogames feature protagonists who are putting two kids through university while dealing with menopause?

It is curious that the identity wars are being fought in genres and mediums that are largely male - the geek genres. I understand a lot of geeks don't know much about the world outside geekdom, and the internet echo-chamber effect only make things worse. Millennials (the ones leading the charges on the barricades) tend to be pretty myopic as a group because of this. So I see why nerdy white progressives are obsessed with nerdy white pop culture, and might mistake it as representative of pop culture as a whole. But as I've said, until I see evidence of the same attention being paid to the sprawling districts of pop culture cultivated for women, I'm going to remain skeptical of the arguments presented in the article.

Ultimately, the market decides what gets made. If good-looking country-music stars with stubble are what the audience for country music wants, that's what they'll get. If there's an untapped market for superhero movies with protagonists who appear different from traditional protagonists, someone will cater to that market and make a bunch of money. Neither the moaning of the people who say there it too much diversity nor the moaning of the people who say there isn't enough will make any difference in the face of financial considerations to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. Businesses that ignore the bottom line don't survive long.
 
Last edited:
I would tend to go with this choice if we are trying to pinpoint origin::

Blazing World was over a hundred years before Mary Shelley was born. Is Margaret Cavendish to be totally discounted?
:: because Margaret Cavendish comes much closer to the following alternative.

Cyrano de Bergerac's works The Other World: or States and Empires of the Moon (Comical History of the States and Empires of the Moon) (published posthumously, 1657) and The States and Empires of the Sun (The States and Empires of the Sun ) (1662) are classics of early modern science fiction. In the form, Cyrano travels to the moon using rockets powered by firecrackers and meets the habitants. The moon-men-have four legs, musical voices, and firearms That shot game and cook it.
 
MWagner makes some excellent points.

Look, give me Ripley or Imperator Furiosa or Blade or Omar Little in a good story, and I'm happy. I don't care what they're like because I don't buy into what I read/watch things in that fannish, literal, over-attached way. I don't have massive emotional upheavals when something happens on programmes I like and I'm not convinced that it's healthy to do so in the way that seems so common these days. Nor do I need to see myself continuously and literally represented in terms of what characters are like, because these are fictional characters and I'm a grown up. I don't care who created the genre I'm "so hot over". I am totally neutral to this, because enjoying a thing isn't a game of whether they're "my guys" or playing for the enemy team. Much of the problem is nothing to do with the patriarchical hegemonistic mono-overarchy, but the fact that 12 year old boys have a lot of money but are dumb.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top