Gormenghast (BBC adaptation)

Toby Frost

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
8,053
The BBC adaptation of Mervyn Peake’s first two Gormenghast novels (Titus Groan and Gormenghast) were aired in early 2000. They tell the story of Steerpike, a kitchen boy who fights his way towards the control of an enormous and ancient castle, Gormenghast. On his path to power, he meets and crosses the strange inhabitants of the castle, with deadly results.

This is one of those lavish productions where even tiny roles are taken by experienced actors. The production looks superb. Gormenghast itself might look a bit too jolly for some tastes, but the designers have incorporated an interesting Chinese influence along with the usual decripit English Gothic, reflecting Peake’s time in China. The scenes in the later episodes, particularly the fourth, use a darker, more faded style.

The script cuts a fair amount of the novels. The first Master of Ritual, Sourdust, is gone – his successor, Barquentine (Warren Mitchell), takes his place throughout the BBC version – as is much of the wetnurse Keda’s (Olga Sosnovska) subplot among the Bright Carvers. Personally, I didn’t mind this. I was more bothered by the wrenching of some of the characterisation, especially Steerpike’s tendency to cackle, and the jolting of Nannie Slagg (June Brown) from dotty old lady to venomous snob and back again as the plot required.

One of the main problems with adapting a book like this is tone: too far one way and you’ve got pantomime; too far the other, and you’re looking at a sort of drab gothness that ignores Peake’s cleverness and humour. Generally, the adaptation gets this right: Nannie Slagg, Prunesquallor (John Sessions) and the Twins (Lynsey Baxter and Zoe Wannamaker) provide light relief that doesn’t detract from the plot, and those characters that start a bit uncertainly (Christopher Lee’s Flay and Fiona Shaw’s Irma in particular) stop twitching so much and become credible inhabitants of the castle. I was surprised how well the teachers, who I found one of the weaker moments of the novels, worked on screen. Stephen Fry, whilst essentially playing Stephen Fry, is well-suited to being Bellgrove.

Steerpike (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) is pretty good overall. However, the writers have given him too much emotion, and he becomes a romantic anti-hero instead of the cold murderer of the novels. Steerpike in the TV version seems to genuinely care about both Fuschia and the “people”: he shouldn’t. He also spends much too much time laughing insanely (he does too much “mad stuff” in general), which doesn’t ring true with the books. A small, thin smile would have been much better, like Santi di Tito’s painting of Machiavelli.

Particular praise, I think, should go to Celia Imrie as Countess Gertrude, Ian Richardson as Lord Sepulchrave and Neve McIntosh as Fuschia, who has the difficult task of aging from 15 to 33 in four episodes. It’s not totally convincing (how could it be from one actress?) but McIntosh gives Fuschia the right mixture of high intelligence and a naivety so intense that it’s almost a psychiatric condition. Imrie’s Gertrude is callous to humans, adoring of her animals, and utterly loyal to the castle, just as in the novels, and when her tough demeanour cracks just a little bit, it’s powerful. Richardson successfully conveys the gloominess but also the anguish of Lord Groan, a man who only seems to show his full humanity while he is going mad.

So overall I would recommend this production. It’s not perfect, but it is a strong attempt to capture the feel of these two novels. Despite its squalor, injustice and violence, I always thought that I would like to visit Gormenghast, if only for a day. Seeing this adaptation, I’d still like to book my ticket.
 
A couple of other points: first, it seems that everyone who reads the two novels has some bits that they don’t especially like. I was probably lucky that one of those bits (the Keda subplot) was just cut, and the second (the teachers) was trimmed down and treated effectively as a single sketch. I think that the streamlining of the book was pretty well done, and the decision to keep to the main plot (Steerpike’s rise to power) was a sensible one.

You’re right, Mosaix, that the books are almost unfilmable. I think they would work best as an animation, which would allow the caricatured quality of the characters to appear without it looking bizarre. To literally portray the characters as depicted in the book would probably require much makeup and would invite over-acting, but I think you could get away with more of that when they weren’t being acted by living people. But this was a very good attempt.
 
Has this been shown again recently? I was talking yesterday to someone in a coffee shop who mentioned he was reading a fantasy series ... began with G ... by some dead guy ... TV series ... gothic (aha!)

I'd almost forgotten it. Seemed strange for it to come up twice in a few days.
 
I don’t think so: in fact, I don’t know if it’s been shown at all since 2000 – which would be a shame, as it’s certainly not a failure by any means. My own re-interest was prompted seeing model scenery for a game called “Mordheim”, which was set in a ruined medieval city. That said, Gormenghast was a huge influence on me and I think it still is. The richness of setting and the grotesque quality remain very appealing. At least one city in the Smith books is influenced by Gormenghast, and several castles and characters are in the fantasy story that I’m currently trying to write.
 
As an aside, I once read Michael Moorcock's homage to Peake, Gloriana, and didn't get on with it at all.
Ah, now I quite enjoyed Gloriana and I'm generally not much of a Moorcock fan. Strangely I actually read it before I read the Gormenghast books and it was only when I did read them that I understood his dedication.

Incidentally, Toby, I don't suppose your naming of the Ghasts has any derivation or is it purely coincidental?
 
I don’t think so: in fact, I don’t know if it’s been shown at all since 2000 – which would be a shame, as it’s certainly not a failure by any means. My own re-interest was prompted seeing model scenery for a game called “Mordheim”, which was set in a ruined medieval city. That said, Gormenghast was a huge influence on me and I think it still is. The richness of setting and the grotesque quality remain very appealing. At least one city in the Smith books is influenced by Gormenghast, and several castles and characters are in the fantasy story that I’m currently trying to write.

I think it has been reshown recently not on the BBC because my daughter has watched it and is reading the book on the back of it.
 
Good to hear that it's still being shown - somewhere...

I've got an obscure question. In Alan Moore's The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, Volume 2, there's a sort of gazetteer of imaginary places. Titus Groan is referred to as having lived in Cologne in Titus Alone, and it's hinted that Gormenghast may be in the Rhine valley. Now, the Gormenghast books aren't really set anywhere, but can anyone think why Alan Moore would have chosen Cologne? There are references to the children in the castle learning French, and a few place names in the castle are borrowed from Sark, but otherwise, I can't remember any real-world locations.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top