Ember in the Ashes - Sabaa Tahir

Brian G Turner

Fantasist & Futurist
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2002
Messages
26,711
Location
UK
Yes, I read it sometime last year. I gave it four stars on Goodreads, and it's a YA I consistently say to be one of the better ones. I don't really write reviews on anything, but I think I remember enough to give you a decent amount of insight into why I think it's good. I'll just list some elements of it, and tell you what I liked, so the post is sure to be a bit lengthy.

I know this post is coming a bit late, so you may have read the book already, but maybe just for future reference this could be of some use.

Love Square (yes, square): I generally despise love triangles because they're generally poorly executed and unnecessary. In this case, she's thrown in another person, so it should be nightmare fuel, but surprisingly I actually thought it worked out pretty well. Whilst the people they are attracted to is predictable (which is true of real life too), the way it ties into the plot is well done. Particularly with Elias. His affection for his childhood friend Helene is great, because they share a fundamental difference in ideology, and I won't spoil it, but the way the plot goes forward, has consequences for their relationship on more than one occasion, whilst seamlessly highlighting the issues of the society they live in. On Laia's side, I think it was a bit more of the typical YA romance, mainly because it seemed forced to me. She falls for some guy in the resistance, and I can't really recall why, nor do I remember finding it as compelling. Laia and Elias's relationship was kind of interesting because they come from opposing backgrounds. For him, you could say that Helene represents the Empire, and Laia represents freedom, which is a running theme in the book. That's not something I got as much from Laia, because whether she chose Elias or the other guy, the result didn't seem as drastic, probably because they're both rebels.

Dual POV
: She alternates between POVs with each chapter. Laia, Elias, Laia, Elias. So it's got a fixed structure. So you don't have to wait too long between cliffhanger chapters to find out what happened.

'Trials' Plotline
: She made it work, and she made it actually quite interesting. I don't recall which trial it is, but whichever one that puts them in the sandstorm is my favourite one, and I loved reading it. Sabaa Tahir done some stuff in that scene a lot of writers for some reason wouldn't do, and it made her book much stronger. Again, an aspect of YA stories I typically don't like, because it's so standard now, but I think she made it refreshing with her approach to it. Not extraordinarily so, not to the point of subverting the trope completely, but enough for me to be fine with it.

First Instalment
: Probably of a trilogy if we go by the average YA series structure. If so, I will say that this is one of the few YA books that I would call 'fulfilling'. It's one of those books that has a mostly complete story arc, with some dangling plot threads for future stories. The way I describe it is that the story lives up to its title, unlike books which have a title but the book has nothing to do with it, usually because the book has no real arc to it. I'm looking forward to the next book at least, so that's saying something.

You could have wildly different views on it, but I don't know many people (particularly males) who read YA, or specifically the books I have, so it would be interesting to see what you think about it.
 
I meant to come back to you on this, but I never properly gathered my thoughts together, so this will be very waffly, as well as largely irrelevant now you've bought the book anyway!

Firstly, I try to avoid reading YA (but I get sucker punched by good looking covers when I'm shopping, and even if I read the blurb properly, I don't bother reading any of the inside, so it's my own fault) so I can't tell you how it rates among its immediate competition, and I'm waaaaay out of its intended readership, so probably being very unfair in what follows.

Anyhow, it wasn't bad, but for my old and jaded taste it was far too teenage angsty, and the story is heavily teenage-romance-based, though I don't know I'd call it a love square as Heir does just because there are 4 people involved. Rather it's two interlocking triangles, which I found rather trite. It's in first person present tense, with short chapters alternating POV between the two leads as Heir says, but despite my antipathy to FPPT it's not badly handled and the quick chapters weren't as choppy as I feared.

The story uses some Roman ideas and terms, but to my mind couldn't in any way be said to be based on the Roman Empire, a pragmatic institution which by and large sought to bring the conquered peoples into the Roman way of doing things and made natives citizens to rule themselves as far as possible, rather than debasing everyone it came upon. There's no hint of any kind of culture exhibited by Elias's people, no civil service or bureaucracy, no trade and wealth creation, not even something as intrinsically Roman as bathing. Basically, as far as I could see it's the Nazi war machine turned up several notches in terms of sadism since they prey on themselves/their children as well as the conquered peoples.

The plot I found predictable, and not terribly plausible, with Laia undertaking what appears to be a suicide mission to save her brother who has been captured by the baddies, but she's the daughter of famous resistance leaders so of course -- NOT REALLY A SPOILER -- she must eventually come good, though we have plenty of angsting en route. Elias's story arc I found a little more satisfying, but his too is all about bloodline and his parents. He is also the more interesting character as far as I was concerned, with Laia being a wet rag for much of the story, and unable to see a very obvious plot point right in front of her eyes.

The book's not self-contained since there's no conclusion to any of the main issues -- the Emperor, the baddies' downfall, the prophecies, the parents -- but I'd agree with Heir that it wraps up a good many of the actual plot elements such as the suicide mission and the Trials which Elias is forced to undergo, so it isn't unsatisfying in that respect.

Would I read the sequel? If it fell into my hands, perhaps, but I wouldn't bother going out and buying it to find out what happens.
 
IMO it's well-written and accomplished - you can see why an agent would take an interest in it.

But at a third of the way through I'm about to give up on it.

There are Roman names, but there's no suggestion of Roman culture to any degree. There are Martials and Scholars and Mariners, and that's as far as the book goes in terms of world-building. It's overly-simplistic even for a YA.

There's a blistering sense of pace and tension - every moment is one of life and death. But there are no quiet periods to contrast it with.

Every character interaction is punctuation with exaggerated sensuality. It's becoming tedious - no two heterosexual people can meet without stirrings of lurrrrve. It's as if the author is waving a big flag saying "Look, romance!". It's forced and takes away any sense of realism.

But what's killing my interest is that the female lead, Laia, is becoming increasingly subject to torture, and these days I refuse to read any novel that makes inflicting pain a routine part of the plot.

I can see why it's popular, but this one's just not for me.
 
Last edited:
I've not read this book, so I can't comment on it, but between The Judge's and Brian's two posts, you've summed up why I avoid both YA and romantic subplots with a vengeance.
 
Oddly -- since I'm terribly squeamish in real life and in writing/reading -- I didn't have a problem with the punishments inflicted on Laia, as sadistic as they were, since they had at least some reality and a smidgen of logic, as slave-masters have done all this and more in the past to ensure obedience. What I found hard to read were the stories of what happened to the children as part of their training, which had no such justification and only went to highlight how unutterably evil the evil empire was.
 
Well, I did go back and finish it. For the most part I think it was decently written and strong on conflict, and I can see why it would - deservedly - do well.

But it felt too much the the case of plot determining story, while the characters raged within their limitations, and in the end didn't really appeal to me personally.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top