Confounding Our Expectations

Narkalui

Nerf Herder
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,202
Location
Sutton, Surrey
Someone (I don't know who, sorry) said in another thread that George is changing stuff to make things different to the TV show and to keep us on our toes. Since the world and his wife (excepting Boaz) are convinced of R+L=J, what better way to confound our expectations than to change things so that Jon is in fact Ned' s *******?

So who is Jon's Mum?

There are a number of candidates for Jon's Mum already: there's Wylla, the girl from The Sisters and there's Ashara Dayne. Since we are already aware of Ned's extremely dutiful and honourable nature, and also due to his experience of the plight of illegitimate children thanks to Robert's shenanigans in The Vale, I think it is fair to say that Ned Stark was not the type, even back then, to give in sexual urges easily. This is one of the main reasons that no one believes Jon to be Ned's son. But for the sake of this argument, he is. So we must ask ourselves, under what circumstances would Ned give 'it' up? Of the three candidates I've listed above, for two of them Ned's only motivation would be to fill his boots. Sow his wild oats. Ned's just not that kind of bloke. No, only if he truly, passionately loved this woman would he give in to his desire. Ashara Dayne.

But how? Or more permanently, when? When he brought Dawn back to Starfall after the Tower of Joy? That's far too late. When Ned brought Jon home to Winterfell, Catalyn noticed that he was a little smaller than Robb not the best part of a year younger. So what about the Harrenhal Tourney? Too early. If that was the case Jon would surely have been born before Ned even married Catalyn; or even before Rheagar ran off with Lyanna perhaps? And if that were the case Ned and Ashara would have been wed before Brandon and Rickard were executed.

If Ashara is Jon's mother, conception must have taken place as close as possible to Robb' s conception. The best I can come up with for this is that Ned and Ashara were betrothed and that Ned was at Starfall for the wedding when news reached them of Lyanna and Rheagar's elopement. In spite of the fact that the young, and madly in love couple had already, secretly, consummated their love, Ned hurriedly leaves for home, leaving his beloved unwed but (unbeknownst to either of them) pregnant.

At the end of the war Ned returns to Starfall with Dawn only for his beloved to take her own life leaving their illegitimate son in his arms. I think if Jon was a little overdue and Robb was a little premature this could work.

There is another question here. And I do have one possible answer. The question is, who Lyanna and Rheagar's child? My answer is Danearys.

Upon receiving Dawn and Danearys, Ashara gives Jon to Eddard and quite rightly tells him, through her tears, what he can do with his apologies. She then has her family swear an Oath to report to the world that she has killed herself in grief and heartbreak before taking the infant girl to Dragonstone, arriving in the middle of a storm. (Viserys is, what, three, four years old? Young enough to believe it when he is told the child is his sister.) Ashara then takes instruction in the faith and becomes a septa before educating the boy whom she believes to be the legitimate son of Rheagar and Elia...

Thoughts?
 
If i may, allow me to correct you.

Martin has said that there will be a twist in the books that CAN'T be on the show because the show has already killed off one of the main characters involved. I think it would be interesting to try to figure out who the character is, but I don't think Jon is involved. I will be floored if it turns out that R+L=someone other than Jon.

I posted a crackpot theory once that Ned is still alive, so I'm going to go with that given how long it's taken him to decide to do it.
 
Last edited:
Narky, if Eddard and Ashara were engaged, then I do not see how he needed to ask Catelyn where she heard the rumor about Ashara being Jon's mother... everyone, including Catelyn would have known about the match... and even more, everyone knew he went to Starfall to return Dawn. How could he have quashed a rumor about spending time with his ex-fiancée when everyone knew it was fact?
 
OK, Ashara and Ned could not have been engaged as that would have been common knowledge. Perhaps, he was meeting her to ask her if he should ask Lord Dayne for permission to marry her..? And perhaps Lord Dayne knew nothing of this encounter and nor did anyone else..? Could that work?
 
OK, Ashara and Ned could not have been engaged as that would have been common knowledge. Perhaps, he was meeting her to ask her if he should ask Lord Dayne for permission to marry her..? And perhaps Lord Dayne knew nothing of this encounter and nor did anyone else..? Could that work?
It's just too out of character for Ned. I just don't believe he could betray Catelyn that way.
 
I don't think Jon is Ned's. I've been trying to take it into account, but it is just that Ned is too disciplined. As I reread AGOT few months back, I simply couldn't envision it anymore. Ned is too dutiful. It just doesn't make sense that he would lapse in such a way.
 
It is isn't it. It's asking too much of us as readers just for the sake of confounding our expectations, no if he's going to change something which isn't confirmed yet then it will be something else.
 
I have to agree with the majority here. No way Eddard Stark betrayed Catelyn in such a way. His honor was everything to him, even in the end he only went against it (by proclaiming Joff the true king) in order to save Sansa's life. I believe this to be the reason he lied to Catelyn (and carried the guilt of doing so) by saying Jon was his, knowing that Robert would see Jon dead if he knew the truth.
 
I don't think it's about honour for him, I think he's just doing the right thing purely because it's the right thing to do. A bit like Superman in that aspect.
 
I don't think it's about honour for him, I think he's just doing the right thing purely because it's the right thing to do. A bit like Superman in that aspect.
Some might say that this is a perfectly fine definition of acting honorably.
 
It may be that back in his twenties he wasn't quite so honorable as when he reached middle age. What was the reason he wouldn't tell Cat who the parents were again? Because it put the child in danger?
If Jon looks similar to Rob and Arya why can't they have one of the same parents? Unless Ned was chosen to help out with the adoption because of the similarity.
The Ned answer is the simpler one. The other is more the accepted complex version.
 
It may be that back in his twenties he wasn't quite so honorable as when he reached middle age. What was the reason he wouldn't tell Cat who the parents were again? Because it put the child in danger?
If Jon looks similar to Rob and Arya why can't they have one of the same parents? Unless Ned was chosen to help out with the adoption because of the similarity.
The Ned answer is the simpler one. The other is more the accepted complex version.
He made promise to his sister who was on her deathbed that he would keep the secret. I don't think you have to be that honorable to keep quiet under those conditions, although I think Ned always tried to do the right things for the right reasons Kama even when he was younger. That's how he was brought up.
 
It may be that back in his twenties he wasn't quite so honorable as when he reached middle age. What was the reason he wouldn't tell Cat who the parents were again? Because it put the child in danger?
If Jon looks similar to Rob and Arya why can't they have one of the same parents? Unless Ned was chosen to help out with the adoption because of the similarity.
The Ned answer is the simpler one. The other is more the accepted complex version.

Ned was described as always being dutiful, even in flashbacks and by people who knew him in the past. It is a character trait of his that was a true constant. Ned would make himself stomp over his honour to protect (Sansa definitely, Jon/Lyanna maybe), but he wouldn't be dishonourable for his own pleasure (as it is claimed he did with Jon's mother).

Ned being father puts Ned's characterization in question. Lyanna being mother is simply something which was hinted at, but never confirmed. Occam's Razor is applied between possible explanations that have no contradictions.
 
I also will be surprised if Jon is not Rhaeghar/Lyanna's. It fits too neatly - Ned's honor preserved, Jon has Targaryen/Stark blood, etc. Any other options will take a lot of messy explanation, not just of the actual events, but of all the hints GRRM has placed.

Along with this, I think GRRM gets a bad rap for "just throwing in twists". Not in what I've read here, but in other places definitely. When I started GoT the fate of Ned was certainly a shock, but as the series went on I now really admire what he does with these "twists". I don't see them as coming from left field, more just that you think to yourself "no, surely he wont go there..." and he does.

So, what I think I'm saying is that I like to hope there's more to Martin's vision/thread/story than just "This'll keep em guessing!"
 
I also will be surprised if Jon is not Rhaeghar/Lyanna's. It fits too neatly - Ned's honor preserved, Jon has Targaryen/Stark blood, etc. Any other options will take a lot of messy explanation, not just of the actual events, but of all the hints GRRM has placed.

Along with this, I think GRRM gets a bad rap for "just throwing in twists". Not in what I've read here, but in other places definitely. When I started GoT the fate of Ned was certainly a shock, but as the series went on I now really admire what he does with these "twists". I don't see them as coming from left field, more just that you think to yourself "no, surely he wont go there..." and he does.

So, what I think I'm saying is that I like to hope there's more to Martin's vision/thread/story than just "This'll keep em guessing!"
Using The Red Wedding as an example, on my first read i was in utter shock, but when i read the book again i felt like an idiot for not putting together all the clues and foreshadowings that led up to the massacre. Martin never uses Deus ex machina. He always forshadows and/oor gives clues before plot twists.
 
Using The Red Wedding as an example, on my first read i was in utter shock, but when i read the book again i felt like an idiot for not putting together all the clues and foreshadowings that led up to the massacre. Martin never uses Deus ex machina. He always forshadows and/oor gives clues before plot twists.
I agree Imp. I am up to ASoS on my (I think) 8th full reread (just FYI reading it for the first time on my Kindle for convenience, def don't like it as well, much harder to flip pages!) anyway, as far as I can tell EVERYTHING of true importance has been foretold so far. So we just need to figure out what those fore tellings that have not happened yet really mean. Easy right?!! Yea, I know still working on that!
 

Similar threads


Back
Top