A ten-foot hole?

Toby Frost

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
8,072
A man would be six feet tall rather than six foot tall, although I often hear "six foot tall" used instead.

But is it right to say "a ten-foot hole had been torn in the hedge"?
 
My understanding of this is that in "a ten-foot hole" the "ten-foot" is used as an adjective and as such only takes the singular form. So you can have:

"The man is sex feet tall" - feet is a plural noun
and
"The ten-foot tall man" - ten-foot is an adjective

maybe...
 
"The man is sex feet tall"
I've heard of someone being sex on legs, but this guy I really want to meet!

Ahem.

Back to the original question, it is acceptable to say "six foot tall" and no need for the hyphen to make it a compound adjective. Per Collins online:
In front of another noun, the plural for the unit of length is foot: a 20-foot putt; his 70-foot ketch. Foot can also be used instead of feet when mentioning a quantity and in front of words like tall: four foot of snow; he is at least six foot tall
I think I'd use "foot" instead of "feet" mostly in direct speech or close POV, though, and avoid it in narrative. So although "a ten-foot hole" passes the in-front-of-another-noun rule, I'd probably reword it to "a hole ten feet long had been torn in the hedge" if that's narrative description.
 
A man would be six feet tall rather than six foot tall, although I often hear "six foot tall" used instead.

But is it right to say "a ten-foot hole had been torn in the hedge"?

Right, he's six feet tall, but he's a six-foot man, or a six-foot-tall man. Your hedge hole is six feet long, but it's a six-foot hole or a six-foot-long hole. Can I see the sexy-footed man through it?
 

Similar threads


Back
Top